Environmental hazard assessment for polymeric and inorganic nanobiomaterials used in drug delivery

Abstract Background The increasing development and use of nanobiomaterials raises questions about their potential adverse effects on the environment after excretion and release. Published ecotoxicological data was searched for five polymeric nanobiomaterials [chitosan, polylactic acid (PLA), polyacr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marina Hauser, Guangyu Li, Bernd Nowack
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-04-01
Series:Journal of Nanobiotechnology
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12951-019-0489-8
_version_ 1798039816305115136
author Marina Hauser
Guangyu Li
Bernd Nowack
author_facet Marina Hauser
Guangyu Li
Bernd Nowack
author_sort Marina Hauser
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The increasing development and use of nanobiomaterials raises questions about their potential adverse effects on the environment after excretion and release. Published ecotoxicological data was searched for five polymeric nanobiomaterials [chitosan, polylactic acid (PLA), polyacrylonitrile (PAN), polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA), and poly(lactic–glycolic acid) (PLGA)] and one inorganic nanobiomaterial [hydroxyapatite (HAP)] to evaluate the environmental hazards for freshwater and soil using a meta-analysis. If enough data was available, a probabilistic species sensitivity distribution (pSSD) and from this a predicted no effect concentration (PNEC) was calculated. If only one data point was available, a PNEC was calculated based on the most sensitive endpoint. Each material was classified either as “nano” or “non-nano”, depending on the categorization in the original articles. When the original article specified that the material consisted of nanoparticles, the material was classified as nano; when nothing was mentioned, the material was classified as “non-nano”. Results For PLA, PHA and PLGA, no published data on ecotoxicity was found and therefore no hazard assessment could be conducted. In soils, HAP was found to have the lowest PNEC with 0.3 mg/kg, followed by PAN and chitosan. In freshwater, chitosan was found to have the lowest PNEC with 5 µg/l, followed by nano-chitosan, HAP and PAN. Conclusion Compared with other common pollutants, even the most sensitive of the selected nanobiomaterials, chitosan, is less toxic than engineered nanomaterials such as nano-ZnO and nano-Ag, some common antibiotics, heavy metals or organic pollutants such as triclosan. Given the current knowledge, the nanobiomaterials covered in this work therefore pose only little or no environmental hazard.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T21:58:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d3e0c16cd93a404eb5b1aa2b022fce2b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1477-3155
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T21:58:54Z
publishDate 2019-04-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Journal of Nanobiotechnology
spelling doaj.art-d3e0c16cd93a404eb5b1aa2b022fce2b2022-12-22T04:01:00ZengBMCJournal of Nanobiotechnology1477-31552019-04-0117111010.1186/s12951-019-0489-8Environmental hazard assessment for polymeric and inorganic nanobiomaterials used in drug deliveryMarina Hauser0Guangyu Li1Bernd Nowack2Empa, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and TechnologyEmpa, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and TechnologyEmpa, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and TechnologyAbstract Background The increasing development and use of nanobiomaterials raises questions about their potential adverse effects on the environment after excretion and release. Published ecotoxicological data was searched for five polymeric nanobiomaterials [chitosan, polylactic acid (PLA), polyacrylonitrile (PAN), polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA), and poly(lactic–glycolic acid) (PLGA)] and one inorganic nanobiomaterial [hydroxyapatite (HAP)] to evaluate the environmental hazards for freshwater and soil using a meta-analysis. If enough data was available, a probabilistic species sensitivity distribution (pSSD) and from this a predicted no effect concentration (PNEC) was calculated. If only one data point was available, a PNEC was calculated based on the most sensitive endpoint. Each material was classified either as “nano” or “non-nano”, depending on the categorization in the original articles. When the original article specified that the material consisted of nanoparticles, the material was classified as nano; when nothing was mentioned, the material was classified as “non-nano”. Results For PLA, PHA and PLGA, no published data on ecotoxicity was found and therefore no hazard assessment could be conducted. In soils, HAP was found to have the lowest PNEC with 0.3 mg/kg, followed by PAN and chitosan. In freshwater, chitosan was found to have the lowest PNEC with 5 µg/l, followed by nano-chitosan, HAP and PAN. Conclusion Compared with other common pollutants, even the most sensitive of the selected nanobiomaterials, chitosan, is less toxic than engineered nanomaterials such as nano-ZnO and nano-Ag, some common antibiotics, heavy metals or organic pollutants such as triclosan. Given the current knowledge, the nanobiomaterials covered in this work therefore pose only little or no environmental hazard.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12951-019-0489-8
spellingShingle Marina Hauser
Guangyu Li
Bernd Nowack
Environmental hazard assessment for polymeric and inorganic nanobiomaterials used in drug delivery
Journal of Nanobiotechnology
title Environmental hazard assessment for polymeric and inorganic nanobiomaterials used in drug delivery
title_full Environmental hazard assessment for polymeric and inorganic nanobiomaterials used in drug delivery
title_fullStr Environmental hazard assessment for polymeric and inorganic nanobiomaterials used in drug delivery
title_full_unstemmed Environmental hazard assessment for polymeric and inorganic nanobiomaterials used in drug delivery
title_short Environmental hazard assessment for polymeric and inorganic nanobiomaterials used in drug delivery
title_sort environmental hazard assessment for polymeric and inorganic nanobiomaterials used in drug delivery
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12951-019-0489-8
work_keys_str_mv AT marinahauser environmentalhazardassessmentforpolymericandinorganicnanobiomaterialsusedindrugdelivery
AT guangyuli environmentalhazardassessmentforpolymericandinorganicnanobiomaterialsusedindrugdelivery
AT berndnowack environmentalhazardassessmentforpolymericandinorganicnanobiomaterialsusedindrugdelivery