The effect of light curing units, curing time, and veneering materials on resin cement microhardness

Background/purpose: Several factors may affects microhardness of resin cement under veneering materials. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different veneering materials, light-curing units and curing times (20/3, 40/6) on the microhardness of dual-cured resin cement. Materials and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nurcan Ozakar Ilday, Yusuf Ziya Bayindir, Funda Bayindir, Aysel Gurpinar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2013-06-01
Series:Journal of Dental Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1991790212001560
_version_ 1818930105811992576
author Nurcan Ozakar Ilday
Yusuf Ziya Bayindir
Funda Bayindir
Aysel Gurpinar
author_facet Nurcan Ozakar Ilday
Yusuf Ziya Bayindir
Funda Bayindir
Aysel Gurpinar
author_sort Nurcan Ozakar Ilday
collection DOAJ
description Background/purpose: Several factors may affects microhardness of resin cement under veneering materials. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different veneering materials, light-curing units and curing times (20/3, 40/6) on the microhardness of dual-cured resin cement. Materials and methods: We pressed dual-cured resin cement specimens (Clearfil SA cement, 5 mm diameter, 1 mm thick) between two microscopic glass slides covered with transparent polystyrene matrix strips to remove excess material, then irradiated them through a ceramic disc and a composite disc (A2 Esthet X HD, Dentsply, Caulk) with three types of high-power light-curing units as follows: conventional halogen light (quartz tungsten halogen) for 20/40 s, light-emitting diodes for 20/40 s and xenon plasma arc for 3/6 s. The control group specimens were cured under two layer transparent polyester matrix strips (n = 5). After dry storage in the dark (24 h/37°C), we recorded specimens’ Vickers microhardness numbers (50 gF load/15 s) and made three indentations on the bottom surface of each one. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance and post-hoc comparisons using Duncan’s test and the Student t test with a significance level of 5%. Results: Analysis of variance revealed significant differences in microhardness resulting from the different curing units, veneering materials and polymerization times (P < 0.05). The light-emitting diode curing unit produced higher microhardness values compared to the conventional halogen light and plasma arc light sources (P < 0.05). Both veneering materials, ceramic, and composite resin, exhibited significantly lower microhardness values than those of the control group (P < 0.05). Extended polymerization time increased mean surface microhardness values of the resin cement specimens (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Light-curing units, curing time, and veneering materials are important factors for achieving adequate dual cure resin composite microhardness. High-intensity light and longer curing times resulted in the highest microhardness values.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T03:55:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d3e6c5b844584ed5b9113f0a59d33731
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1991-7902
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T03:55:25Z
publishDate 2013-06-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Journal of Dental Sciences
spelling doaj.art-d3e6c5b844584ed5b9113f0a59d337312022-12-21T19:54:21ZengElsevierJournal of Dental Sciences1991-79022013-06-018214114610.1016/j.jds.2012.09.014The effect of light curing units, curing time, and veneering materials on resin cement microhardnessNurcan Ozakar Ilday0Yusuf Ziya Bayindir1Funda Bayindir2Aysel Gurpinar3Department of Restorative Dentistry, Atatürk University, Erzurum, TurkeyDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Atatürk University, Erzurum, TurkeyDepartment of Prosthodontics, Atatürk University, Erzurum, TurkeyDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Atatürk University, Erzurum, TurkeyBackground/purpose: Several factors may affects microhardness of resin cement under veneering materials. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different veneering materials, light-curing units and curing times (20/3, 40/6) on the microhardness of dual-cured resin cement. Materials and methods: We pressed dual-cured resin cement specimens (Clearfil SA cement, 5 mm diameter, 1 mm thick) between two microscopic glass slides covered with transparent polystyrene matrix strips to remove excess material, then irradiated them through a ceramic disc and a composite disc (A2 Esthet X HD, Dentsply, Caulk) with three types of high-power light-curing units as follows: conventional halogen light (quartz tungsten halogen) for 20/40 s, light-emitting diodes for 20/40 s and xenon plasma arc for 3/6 s. The control group specimens were cured under two layer transparent polyester matrix strips (n = 5). After dry storage in the dark (24 h/37°C), we recorded specimens’ Vickers microhardness numbers (50 gF load/15 s) and made three indentations on the bottom surface of each one. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance and post-hoc comparisons using Duncan’s test and the Student t test with a significance level of 5%. Results: Analysis of variance revealed significant differences in microhardness resulting from the different curing units, veneering materials and polymerization times (P < 0.05). The light-emitting diode curing unit produced higher microhardness values compared to the conventional halogen light and plasma arc light sources (P < 0.05). Both veneering materials, ceramic, and composite resin, exhibited significantly lower microhardness values than those of the control group (P < 0.05). Extended polymerization time increased mean surface microhardness values of the resin cement specimens (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Light-curing units, curing time, and veneering materials are important factors for achieving adequate dual cure resin composite microhardness. High-intensity light and longer curing times resulted in the highest microhardness values.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1991790212001560curing lightsmicrohardnessresin cementsveneering materials
spellingShingle Nurcan Ozakar Ilday
Yusuf Ziya Bayindir
Funda Bayindir
Aysel Gurpinar
The effect of light curing units, curing time, and veneering materials on resin cement microhardness
Journal of Dental Sciences
curing lights
microhardness
resin cements
veneering materials
title The effect of light curing units, curing time, and veneering materials on resin cement microhardness
title_full The effect of light curing units, curing time, and veneering materials on resin cement microhardness
title_fullStr The effect of light curing units, curing time, and veneering materials on resin cement microhardness
title_full_unstemmed The effect of light curing units, curing time, and veneering materials on resin cement microhardness
title_short The effect of light curing units, curing time, and veneering materials on resin cement microhardness
title_sort effect of light curing units curing time and veneering materials on resin cement microhardness
topic curing lights
microhardness
resin cements
veneering materials
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1991790212001560
work_keys_str_mv AT nurcanozakarilday theeffectoflightcuringunitscuringtimeandveneeringmaterialsonresincementmicrohardness
AT yusufziyabayindir theeffectoflightcuringunitscuringtimeandveneeringmaterialsonresincementmicrohardness
AT fundabayindir theeffectoflightcuringunitscuringtimeandveneeringmaterialsonresincementmicrohardness
AT ayselgurpinar theeffectoflightcuringunitscuringtimeandveneeringmaterialsonresincementmicrohardness
AT nurcanozakarilday effectoflightcuringunitscuringtimeandveneeringmaterialsonresincementmicrohardness
AT yusufziyabayindir effectoflightcuringunitscuringtimeandveneeringmaterialsonresincementmicrohardness
AT fundabayindir effectoflightcuringunitscuringtimeandveneeringmaterialsonresincementmicrohardness
AT ayselgurpinar effectoflightcuringunitscuringtimeandveneeringmaterialsonresincementmicrohardness