Native Forests Show Resilience to Selective Timber Harvesting in Southeast Queensland, Australia

There is little published information on effects of management on the structure of mixed species forests in Queensland, Australia. We used long-term growth, abundance and dimension data from permanent plots to test the hypothesis that harvesting would reduce numbers of large trees and growth increme...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mathias Neumann, Mark A. Adams, Tom Lewis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-12-01
Series:Frontiers in Forests and Global Change
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/ffgc.2021.750350/full
_version_ 1818722759847444480
author Mathias Neumann
Mathias Neumann
Mark A. Adams
Tom Lewis
Tom Lewis
author_facet Mathias Neumann
Mathias Neumann
Mark A. Adams
Tom Lewis
Tom Lewis
author_sort Mathias Neumann
collection DOAJ
description There is little published information on effects of management on the structure of mixed species forests in Queensland, Australia. We used long-term growth, abundance and dimension data from permanent plots to test the hypothesis that harvesting would reduce numbers of large trees and growth increments, while increasing recruitment. This hypothesis is key to policy and management decisions for forests covering about 9.5 million hectares. Inclusion of data on changes in forest structure (e.g., tree diameter, stem density) helps in assessment of forest suitability as habitat for a range of species. Growth rate (basal area) varied widely among forest types. Growth of each of four key species (i.e., Eucalyptus pilularis, Corymbia citriodora ssp. variegata, Callitris glaucophylla, and Eucalyptus crebra) reflected variation in rainfall across the study region. Callitris glaucophylla, a native conifer, is dominant when rainfall is < 600 mm per year. Corymbia citriodora ssp. variegata grows across much wider ranges in rainfall (600–1,200 mm year–1) at rates similar to Callitris glaucophylla. Historic harvesting increased recruitment and also increased the symmetry of diameter distributions. Harvesting has not reduced the current density of larger trees (diameter at breast height, DBH ≥ 60 cm) at a regional scale. Stand growth was unaffected by management principally owing to an increase in the density of trees of smaller diameter (10–20 cm DBH). Self-thinning limits potential stocking and we tested 3 methods for predicting self-thinning across forest types. We found that the slope of self-thinning lines under drier conditions is mostly < –2, suggesting highly dynamic self-thinning. Using a species-boundary line approach, growth is predicted to slow when basal areas reach around 66.1 m2 ha–1 in E. pilularis, 19.0 m2 ha–1 in C. citriodora ssp. variegata, 16.5 m2 ha–1 in Callitris glaucophylla, and 14.2 m2 ha–1 in E. crebra. The slope of the self-thinning line for E. pilularis was –1.662, similar to Reineke’s Stand Density Index (slope –1.605). To date, there is little evidence that selective harvesting and thinning have had negative impacts on rates of growth, on timber production, carbon sequestration or on aspects of forest structure regarded as important for biodiversity.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T20:59:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d3fec51251ef45309b651eb18f1aa71b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2624-893X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T20:59:44Z
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Forests and Global Change
spelling doaj.art-d3fec51251ef45309b651eb18f1aa71b2022-12-21T21:32:47ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Forests and Global Change2624-893X2021-12-01410.3389/ffgc.2021.750350750350Native Forests Show Resilience to Selective Timber Harvesting in Southeast Queensland, AustraliaMathias Neumann0Mathias Neumann1Mark A. Adams2Tom Lewis3Tom Lewis4Department of Chemistry and Biotechnology, Faculty of Science, Engineering and Technology, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC, AustraliaInstitute of Silviculture, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, AustriaDepartment of Chemistry and Biotechnology, Faculty of Science, Engineering and Technology, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC, AustraliaDepartment of Agriculture and Fisheries, Brisbane, QLD, AustraliaUniversity of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore, QLD, AustraliaThere is little published information on effects of management on the structure of mixed species forests in Queensland, Australia. We used long-term growth, abundance and dimension data from permanent plots to test the hypothesis that harvesting would reduce numbers of large trees and growth increments, while increasing recruitment. This hypothesis is key to policy and management decisions for forests covering about 9.5 million hectares. Inclusion of data on changes in forest structure (e.g., tree diameter, stem density) helps in assessment of forest suitability as habitat for a range of species. Growth rate (basal area) varied widely among forest types. Growth of each of four key species (i.e., Eucalyptus pilularis, Corymbia citriodora ssp. variegata, Callitris glaucophylla, and Eucalyptus crebra) reflected variation in rainfall across the study region. Callitris glaucophylla, a native conifer, is dominant when rainfall is < 600 mm per year. Corymbia citriodora ssp. variegata grows across much wider ranges in rainfall (600–1,200 mm year–1) at rates similar to Callitris glaucophylla. Historic harvesting increased recruitment and also increased the symmetry of diameter distributions. Harvesting has not reduced the current density of larger trees (diameter at breast height, DBH ≥ 60 cm) at a regional scale. Stand growth was unaffected by management principally owing to an increase in the density of trees of smaller diameter (10–20 cm DBH). Self-thinning limits potential stocking and we tested 3 methods for predicting self-thinning across forest types. We found that the slope of self-thinning lines under drier conditions is mostly < –2, suggesting highly dynamic self-thinning. Using a species-boundary line approach, growth is predicted to slow when basal areas reach around 66.1 m2 ha–1 in E. pilularis, 19.0 m2 ha–1 in C. citriodora ssp. variegata, 16.5 m2 ha–1 in Callitris glaucophylla, and 14.2 m2 ha–1 in E. crebra. The slope of the self-thinning line for E. pilularis was –1.662, similar to Reineke’s Stand Density Index (slope –1.605). To date, there is little evidence that selective harvesting and thinning have had negative impacts on rates of growth, on timber production, carbon sequestration or on aspects of forest structure regarded as important for biodiversity.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/ffgc.2021.750350/fullEucalyptusCallitriscarbon storagepotential stockingself-thinningpermanent sample plots
spellingShingle Mathias Neumann
Mathias Neumann
Mark A. Adams
Tom Lewis
Tom Lewis
Native Forests Show Resilience to Selective Timber Harvesting in Southeast Queensland, Australia
Frontiers in Forests and Global Change
Eucalyptus
Callitris
carbon storage
potential stocking
self-thinning
permanent sample plots
title Native Forests Show Resilience to Selective Timber Harvesting in Southeast Queensland, Australia
title_full Native Forests Show Resilience to Selective Timber Harvesting in Southeast Queensland, Australia
title_fullStr Native Forests Show Resilience to Selective Timber Harvesting in Southeast Queensland, Australia
title_full_unstemmed Native Forests Show Resilience to Selective Timber Harvesting in Southeast Queensland, Australia
title_short Native Forests Show Resilience to Selective Timber Harvesting in Southeast Queensland, Australia
title_sort native forests show resilience to selective timber harvesting in southeast queensland australia
topic Eucalyptus
Callitris
carbon storage
potential stocking
self-thinning
permanent sample plots
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/ffgc.2021.750350/full
work_keys_str_mv AT mathiasneumann nativeforestsshowresiliencetoselectivetimberharvestinginsoutheastqueenslandaustralia
AT mathiasneumann nativeforestsshowresiliencetoselectivetimberharvestinginsoutheastqueenslandaustralia
AT markaadams nativeforestsshowresiliencetoselectivetimberharvestinginsoutheastqueenslandaustralia
AT tomlewis nativeforestsshowresiliencetoselectivetimberharvestinginsoutheastqueenslandaustralia
AT tomlewis nativeforestsshowresiliencetoselectivetimberharvestinginsoutheastqueenslandaustralia