Measuring Malaysia’s Illicit Tobacco Trade: An Excise Tax Gap Analysis

<p>There is a lack of independent data regarding the illicit tobacco trade in Malaysia. Tobacco Industry (TI) commissioned data has previously been criticised for overestimating the illicit tobacco trade and for a lack of methodological transparency. The aim of this study is to present an inde...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ridzuan Kunji Koya, J. Robert Branston, Allen W. A. Gallagher
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: LSE Press 2022-09-01
Series:Journal of Illicit Economies and Development
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jied.lse.ac.uk/articles/151
_version_ 1797961741050576896
author Ridzuan Kunji Koya
J. Robert Branston
Allen W. A. Gallagher
author_facet Ridzuan Kunji Koya
J. Robert Branston
Allen W. A. Gallagher
author_sort Ridzuan Kunji Koya
collection DOAJ
description <p>There is a lack of independent data regarding the illicit tobacco trade in Malaysia. Tobacco Industry (TI) commissioned data has previously been criticised for overestimating the illicit tobacco trade and for a lack of methodological transparency. The aim of this study is to present an independent overview of Malaysia’s illicit tobacco market by measuring the country’s factory-made cigarette excise tax gap. Using data sourced from Malaysian government publications we calculate the excise tax gap between 2011 and 2019 based on existing approaches whereby the excise tax actually paid is compared with that theoretically due based on estimates of total tobacco consumption. For sensitivity analysis, we established 4 different scenarios of tobacco consumption levels.</p><p>Our central estimate is that the tax gap increased from 49% (2012) to 65% (2017), indicating that about two-thirds of cigarettes consumed were illicit, untaxed cigarettes. Increases in the tax gap occurred when taxes increased (e.g., 2014) and when they did not (e.g., 2017), and a slight decline was also evident when taxes were unchanged (e.g., 2012). The size of the tax gap was sensitive to the consumption estimates, where a 10% increase in consumption was generally associated with 3–5 percentage point increase in the tax gap. This study, to our knowledge, is the first independent estimate of Malaysia’s tax gap/rate of the illicit tobacco trade. We suggest the Malaysian government maintain its tax policies whilst strengthening its anti-illicit tobacco trade measures, including ratifying the Protocol to Eliminate Illicit Trade in Tobacco Products.</p><p> </p><strong>Highlights</strong><ul><li>An independent view of the illicit tobacco trade in Malaysia by measuring the country’s tobacco excise tax gap.</li><li>Insights into the accuracy of TI estimates on Malaysia’s tobacco trade.</li><li>Suggestions for actions that should be taken by the Malaysian government to combat the illicit tobacco trade.</li><li>Government Survey data is used to measure consumption which isn’t available each year, so yearly consumption estimates are produced via linear interpolation between survey waves.</li><li>Consumption estimates cover those aged 15 or above.</li></ul>
first_indexed 2024-04-11T01:02:27Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d402a62411a4469098dd85c55b8ea4d5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2516-7227
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T01:02:27Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher LSE Press
record_format Article
series Journal of Illicit Economies and Development
spelling doaj.art-d402a62411a4469098dd85c55b8ea4d52023-01-04T15:01:02ZengLSE PressJournal of Illicit Economies and Development2516-72272022-09-014110.31389/jied.15187Measuring Malaysia’s Illicit Tobacco Trade: An Excise Tax Gap AnalysisRidzuan Kunji Koya0J. Robert Branston1Allen W. A. Gallagher2University of BathUniversity of BathUniversity of Bath<p>There is a lack of independent data regarding the illicit tobacco trade in Malaysia. Tobacco Industry (TI) commissioned data has previously been criticised for overestimating the illicit tobacco trade and for a lack of methodological transparency. The aim of this study is to present an independent overview of Malaysia’s illicit tobacco market by measuring the country’s factory-made cigarette excise tax gap. Using data sourced from Malaysian government publications we calculate the excise tax gap between 2011 and 2019 based on existing approaches whereby the excise tax actually paid is compared with that theoretically due based on estimates of total tobacco consumption. For sensitivity analysis, we established 4 different scenarios of tobacco consumption levels.</p><p>Our central estimate is that the tax gap increased from 49% (2012) to 65% (2017), indicating that about two-thirds of cigarettes consumed were illicit, untaxed cigarettes. Increases in the tax gap occurred when taxes increased (e.g., 2014) and when they did not (e.g., 2017), and a slight decline was also evident when taxes were unchanged (e.g., 2012). The size of the tax gap was sensitive to the consumption estimates, where a 10% increase in consumption was generally associated with 3–5 percentage point increase in the tax gap. This study, to our knowledge, is the first independent estimate of Malaysia’s tax gap/rate of the illicit tobacco trade. We suggest the Malaysian government maintain its tax policies whilst strengthening its anti-illicit tobacco trade measures, including ratifying the Protocol to Eliminate Illicit Trade in Tobacco Products.</p><p> </p><strong>Highlights</strong><ul><li>An independent view of the illicit tobacco trade in Malaysia by measuring the country’s tobacco excise tax gap.</li><li>Insights into the accuracy of TI estimates on Malaysia’s tobacco trade.</li><li>Suggestions for actions that should be taken by the Malaysian government to combat the illicit tobacco trade.</li><li>Government Survey data is used to measure consumption which isn’t available each year, so yearly consumption estimates are produced via linear interpolation between survey waves.</li><li>Consumption estimates cover those aged 15 or above.</li></ul>https://jied.lse.ac.uk/articles/151tax gapillicit tobacco tradetobacco industry
spellingShingle Ridzuan Kunji Koya
J. Robert Branston
Allen W. A. Gallagher
Measuring Malaysia’s Illicit Tobacco Trade: An Excise Tax Gap Analysis
Journal of Illicit Economies and Development
tax gap
illicit tobacco trade
tobacco industry
title Measuring Malaysia’s Illicit Tobacco Trade: An Excise Tax Gap Analysis
title_full Measuring Malaysia’s Illicit Tobacco Trade: An Excise Tax Gap Analysis
title_fullStr Measuring Malaysia’s Illicit Tobacco Trade: An Excise Tax Gap Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Measuring Malaysia’s Illicit Tobacco Trade: An Excise Tax Gap Analysis
title_short Measuring Malaysia’s Illicit Tobacco Trade: An Excise Tax Gap Analysis
title_sort measuring malaysia s illicit tobacco trade an excise tax gap analysis
topic tax gap
illicit tobacco trade
tobacco industry
url https://jied.lse.ac.uk/articles/151
work_keys_str_mv AT ridzuankunjikoya measuringmalaysiasillicittobaccotradeanexcisetaxgapanalysis
AT jrobertbranston measuringmalaysiasillicittobaccotradeanexcisetaxgapanalysis
AT allenwagallagher measuringmalaysiasillicittobaccotradeanexcisetaxgapanalysis