Registered reports in forensic science

Research assessing the validity and reliability of many forensic science disciplines has been published; however, the quality of this research varies depending on the methodologies employed. This was a major point of contention with the United States' President's Council of Advisors on Sci...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M. M. Houck, J. Chin, H. Swofford, C. Gibb
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Royal Society 2022-11-01
Series:Royal Society Open Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.221076
_version_ 1797845361759354880
author M. M. Houck
J. Chin
H. Swofford
C. Gibb
author_facet M. M. Houck
J. Chin
H. Swofford
C. Gibb
author_sort M. M. Houck
collection DOAJ
description Research assessing the validity and reliability of many forensic science disciplines has been published; however, the quality of this research varies depending on the methodologies employed. This was a major point of contention with the United States' President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, who recognized the existing literature but found the majority lacking because of methodological issues. Questionable scientific methodologies have undermined the forensic science community's ability to defend the scientific foundations and examination protocols used to examine evidence in criminal cases. Such scientific failures have significant legal implications. Registered reports, which strengthen the quality of scientific research and reliability of laboratory protocols, can provide transparency, validity and a stronger scientific foundation for forensic science.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T17:37:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d40822d936e94adaabd564f6c68b01fa
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2054-5703
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T17:37:49Z
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher The Royal Society
record_format Article
series Royal Society Open Science
spelling doaj.art-d40822d936e94adaabd564f6c68b01fa2023-04-17T10:54:42ZengThe Royal SocietyRoyal Society Open Science2054-57032022-11-0191110.1098/rsos.221076Registered reports in forensic scienceM. M. Houck0J. Chin1H. Swofford2C. Gibb3Graduate Program Director, Global Forensic and Justice Center, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USACollege of Law, Australian National University Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2000, AustraliaHJS Consulting, LLC, Washington, DC, USA; Senior Editor, Forensic Science International: SynergyThe University of Twente, Amsterdam, The NetherlandsResearch assessing the validity and reliability of many forensic science disciplines has been published; however, the quality of this research varies depending on the methodologies employed. This was a major point of contention with the United States' President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, who recognized the existing literature but found the majority lacking because of methodological issues. Questionable scientific methodologies have undermined the forensic science community's ability to defend the scientific foundations and examination protocols used to examine evidence in criminal cases. Such scientific failures have significant legal implications. Registered reports, which strengthen the quality of scientific research and reliability of laboratory protocols, can provide transparency, validity and a stronger scientific foundation for forensic science.https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.221076registered reportsforensic sciencequalitymethodologyjustice
spellingShingle M. M. Houck
J. Chin
H. Swofford
C. Gibb
Registered reports in forensic science
Royal Society Open Science
registered reports
forensic science
quality
methodology
justice
title Registered reports in forensic science
title_full Registered reports in forensic science
title_fullStr Registered reports in forensic science
title_full_unstemmed Registered reports in forensic science
title_short Registered reports in forensic science
title_sort registered reports in forensic science
topic registered reports
forensic science
quality
methodology
justice
url https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.221076
work_keys_str_mv AT mmhouck registeredreportsinforensicscience
AT jchin registeredreportsinforensicscience
AT hswofford registeredreportsinforensicscience
AT cgibb registeredreportsinforensicscience