ANALISIS WACANA KRITIS: METODE ANALISIS DALAM PERSPEKTIF NORMAN FAIRCLOUGH

The analysis of texts both written and spoken is not explicitly and systematically correlated to the discourse structure. Some critical linguistic contributions and social semiotics have been ignored. According to Van Dijk, a discourse is developed by three dimensions: texts, social cognition and so...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Endang Sumarti
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: State Institute of Islamic Studies (IAIN) Tulungagung 2010-11-01
Series:Jurnal Bahasa Lingua Scientia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ejournal.iain-tulungagung.ac.id/index.php/ls/article/view/2087
_version_ 1798024971505631232
author Endang Sumarti
author_facet Endang Sumarti
author_sort Endang Sumarti
collection DOAJ
description The analysis of texts both written and spoken is not explicitly and systematically correlated to the discourse structure. Some critical linguistic contributions and social semiotics have been ignored. According to Van Dijk, a discourse is developed by three dimensions: texts, social cognition and social contexts. Quite similarly, Norman Fairclough’s analysis is conducted based on a main question how can a micro text be related to the macro social contexts.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T18:11:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d4145c99a6eb4b61bd14554a8394bb23
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2086-1753
2549-4228
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T18:11:15Z
publishDate 2010-11-01
publisher State Institute of Islamic Studies (IAIN) Tulungagung
record_format Article
series Jurnal Bahasa Lingua Scientia
spelling doaj.art-d4145c99a6eb4b61bd14554a8394bb232022-12-22T04:10:08ZengState Institute of Islamic Studies (IAIN) TulungagungJurnal Bahasa Lingua Scientia2086-17532549-42282010-11-012210.21274/ls.v2i2.2087ANALISIS WACANA KRITIS: METODE ANALISIS DALAM PERSPEKTIF NORMAN FAIRCLOUGHEndang Sumarti0IKIP Budi Utomo MalangThe analysis of texts both written and spoken is not explicitly and systematically correlated to the discourse structure. Some critical linguistic contributions and social semiotics have been ignored. According to Van Dijk, a discourse is developed by three dimensions: texts, social cognition and social contexts. Quite similarly, Norman Fairclough’s analysis is conducted based on a main question how can a micro text be related to the macro social contexts.http://ejournal.iain-tulungagung.ac.id/index.php/ls/article/view/2087Analisis wacana kritisperspektif Norman Fairclough
spellingShingle Endang Sumarti
ANALISIS WACANA KRITIS: METODE ANALISIS DALAM PERSPEKTIF NORMAN FAIRCLOUGH
Jurnal Bahasa Lingua Scientia
Analisis wacana kritis
perspektif Norman Fairclough
title ANALISIS WACANA KRITIS: METODE ANALISIS DALAM PERSPEKTIF NORMAN FAIRCLOUGH
title_full ANALISIS WACANA KRITIS: METODE ANALISIS DALAM PERSPEKTIF NORMAN FAIRCLOUGH
title_fullStr ANALISIS WACANA KRITIS: METODE ANALISIS DALAM PERSPEKTIF NORMAN FAIRCLOUGH
title_full_unstemmed ANALISIS WACANA KRITIS: METODE ANALISIS DALAM PERSPEKTIF NORMAN FAIRCLOUGH
title_short ANALISIS WACANA KRITIS: METODE ANALISIS DALAM PERSPEKTIF NORMAN FAIRCLOUGH
title_sort analisis wacana kritis metode analisis dalam perspektif norman fairclough
topic Analisis wacana kritis
perspektif Norman Fairclough
url http://ejournal.iain-tulungagung.ac.id/index.php/ls/article/view/2087
work_keys_str_mv AT endangsumarti analisiswacanakritismetodeanalisisdalamperspektifnormanfairclough