Aiming for a Better Public Realm: Gauging the Effectiveness of Design Control Methods in Wellington, New Zealand
Design review aims to improve the quality of urban settings, principally by seeking to influence the design of individual buildings positively during the planning approval stages of development. Design review systems were first set up in New Zealand in the mid-1990s in Wellington. The aims of desig...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2015-01-01
|
| Series: | Buildings |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/5/1/69 |
| _version_ | 1798045726340546560 |
|---|---|
| author | Morten Gjerde Brenda Vale |
| author_facet | Morten Gjerde Brenda Vale |
| author_sort | Morten Gjerde |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Design review aims to improve the quality of urban settings, principally by seeking to influence the design of individual buildings positively during the planning approval stages of development. Design review systems were first set up in New Zealand in the mid-1990s in Wellington. The aims of design review are laudable; even if the process is not set up to secure the best possible design outcome it should be able to prevent the worst outrages, so as to ensure a minimal visual quality of streetscapes. However, does design review really achieve what it sets out to do? After a brief summary of design review practices, this article considers whether current design control practices in Wellington are helping to foster well-liked urban streetscapes. Using the results from a recent case study, comparing the aesthetic preferences of the public to those of professionals who participate in design control, the article notes where preferences overlap and where they are different. In the process, the characteristics of buildings and streetscapes that are considered positive and negative are identified. The article goes on to speculate how design review could be made to work more effectively in Wellington. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-11T23:25:51Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-d42196b3c3fb43b9a5767c8732cbdaec |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2075-5309 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-11T23:25:51Z |
| publishDate | 2015-01-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Buildings |
| spelling | doaj.art-d42196b3c3fb43b9a5767c8732cbdaec2022-12-22T03:57:19ZengMDPI AGBuildings2075-53092015-01-0151698410.3390/buildings5010069buildings5010069Aiming for a Better Public Realm: Gauging the Effectiveness of Design Control Methods in Wellington, New ZealandMorten Gjerde0Brenda Vale1School of Architecture, Victoria University of Wellington, P.O. Box 600, Wellington 6140, New ZealandSchool of Architecture, Victoria University of Wellington, P.O. Box 600, Wellington 6140, New ZealandDesign review aims to improve the quality of urban settings, principally by seeking to influence the design of individual buildings positively during the planning approval stages of development. Design review systems were first set up in New Zealand in the mid-1990s in Wellington. The aims of design review are laudable; even if the process is not set up to secure the best possible design outcome it should be able to prevent the worst outrages, so as to ensure a minimal visual quality of streetscapes. However, does design review really achieve what it sets out to do? After a brief summary of design review practices, this article considers whether current design control practices in Wellington are helping to foster well-liked urban streetscapes. Using the results from a recent case study, comparing the aesthetic preferences of the public to those of professionals who participate in design control, the article notes where preferences overlap and where they are different. In the process, the characteristics of buildings and streetscapes that are considered positive and negative are identified. The article goes on to speculate how design review could be made to work more effectively in Wellington.http://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/5/1/69design reviewurban design guidanceenvironmental aestheticsurban streetscapes |
| spellingShingle | Morten Gjerde Brenda Vale Aiming for a Better Public Realm: Gauging the Effectiveness of Design Control Methods in Wellington, New Zealand Buildings design review urban design guidance environmental aesthetics urban streetscapes |
| title | Aiming for a Better Public Realm: Gauging the Effectiveness of Design Control Methods in Wellington, New Zealand |
| title_full | Aiming for a Better Public Realm: Gauging the Effectiveness of Design Control Methods in Wellington, New Zealand |
| title_fullStr | Aiming for a Better Public Realm: Gauging the Effectiveness of Design Control Methods in Wellington, New Zealand |
| title_full_unstemmed | Aiming for a Better Public Realm: Gauging the Effectiveness of Design Control Methods in Wellington, New Zealand |
| title_short | Aiming for a Better Public Realm: Gauging the Effectiveness of Design Control Methods in Wellington, New Zealand |
| title_sort | aiming for a better public realm gauging the effectiveness of design control methods in wellington new zealand |
| topic | design review urban design guidance environmental aesthetics urban streetscapes |
| url | http://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/5/1/69 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mortengjerde aimingforabetterpublicrealmgaugingtheeffectivenessofdesigncontrolmethodsinwellingtonnewzealand AT brendavale aimingforabetterpublicrealmgaugingtheeffectivenessofdesigncontrolmethodsinwellingtonnewzealand |