Comparative evaluation of self-adhering flowable and conventional flowable composites using different adhesive systems
Introduction: The ability to seal margins is considered as one of the best predictors for the long-term success of bonded restorations. The aim of this study was to compare microleakage in occlusal and gingival margins between cavities filled with self-adhesive flowable and conventional flowable com...
Main Authors: | Maede Rahmanifard, Effat Khodadadi, Soraya Khafri, Fariba Ezoji |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Babol University of Medical Sciences
2019-09-01
|
Series: | Caspian journal of dental research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://cjdr.ir/article-1-283-en.html |
Similar Items
-
Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage of Flowable Composite Resin Using Etch and Rinse, Self-Etch Adhesive Systems, and Self-Adhesive Flowable Composite Resin in Class V Cavities: Confocal Laser Microscopic Study
by: Ekta Varma Sengar, et al.
Published: (2022-07-01) -
Surface Micro-Hardness and Wear Resistance of a Self-Adhesive Flowable Composite in Comparison to Conventional Flowable Composites
by: Fateme Azizi, et al.
Published: (2023-05-01) -
Effect of Mechanical Load Cycling on Microleakage of Restorative Glass Ionomers Compared to Flowable Composite Resin in Class V Cavities
by: Zahra Hasani, et al.
Published: (2019-04-01) -
Comparison of Microleakage of a Self-adhesive Composite with a Conventional Flowable Composite and Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement in Class V Restorations
by: Maryam Mofidi, et al.
Published: (2022-12-01) -
Comparison of shear bond strength of a composite resin to resin modified and conventional glass ionomer using different bonding systems
by: Mahtab Banimostafa, et al.
Published: (2020-09-01)