Review: castration – animal welfare considerations

ABSTRACTThe castration of male cattle is an integral part of routine farm management. The nature and duration of an animal’s response to castration are dependent on a number of factors, including the method employed, the age of animals, the post-castration management, and whether or not pain relief...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gabriela A. Marquette, Stephanie Ronan, Bernadette Earley
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2023-12-01
Series:Journal of Applied Animal Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/09712119.2023.2273270
_version_ 1797448360084373504
author Gabriela A. Marquette
Stephanie Ronan
Bernadette Earley
author_facet Gabriela A. Marquette
Stephanie Ronan
Bernadette Earley
author_sort Gabriela A. Marquette
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACTThe castration of male cattle is an integral part of routine farm management. The nature and duration of an animal’s response to castration are dependent on a number of factors, including the method employed, the age of animals, the post-castration management, and whether or not pain relief is provided with the procedure. Scientific assessments of the impact of castration on cattle welfare, including pain and injury, stress, inflammation, immune, and production, are the subject of this review. The objectives of this review are to describe (1) the different methods of castration, (2) the pain responses associated with each of those methods, and (3) how age and pain mitigation strategies affect those responses. Research studies are presented that have addressed the challenges imposed by castration procedures on the welfare of cattle based on two main biological events: (1) the changes in biological functions required to cope with the procedure, and (2) the biological consequences to the animals. Indices of animal well-being are described that have objectively demonstrated: (1) the degree of noxiousness that an animal experiences following castration and the success of the coping mechanisms, and (2) the benefit of using pain management in modulating these responses.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T14:09:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d4392ff4c45c4660959869b562c475f9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0971-2119
0974-1844
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T14:09:12Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Journal of Applied Animal Research
spelling doaj.art-d4392ff4c45c4660959869b562c475f92023-11-29T18:00:51ZengTaylor & Francis GroupJournal of Applied Animal Research0971-21190974-18442023-12-0151170371810.1080/09712119.2023.2273270Review: castration – animal welfare considerationsGabriela A. Marquette0Stephanie Ronan1Bernadette Earley2Animal and Bioscience Research Department, Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre (AGRIC), Teagasc, Dunsany, IrelandDepartment of Agriculture, Food and the Marine, Agriculture House, Dublin 2, IrelandAnimal and Bioscience Research Department, Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre (AGRIC), Teagasc, Dunsany, IrelandABSTRACTThe castration of male cattle is an integral part of routine farm management. The nature and duration of an animal’s response to castration are dependent on a number of factors, including the method employed, the age of animals, the post-castration management, and whether or not pain relief is provided with the procedure. Scientific assessments of the impact of castration on cattle welfare, including pain and injury, stress, inflammation, immune, and production, are the subject of this review. The objectives of this review are to describe (1) the different methods of castration, (2) the pain responses associated with each of those methods, and (3) how age and pain mitigation strategies affect those responses. Research studies are presented that have addressed the challenges imposed by castration procedures on the welfare of cattle based on two main biological events: (1) the changes in biological functions required to cope with the procedure, and (2) the biological consequences to the animals. Indices of animal well-being are described that have objectively demonstrated: (1) the degree of noxiousness that an animal experiences following castration and the success of the coping mechanisms, and (2) the benefit of using pain management in modulating these responses.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/09712119.2023.2273270Castrationcattleagebreedcastration methodsBurdizzo
spellingShingle Gabriela A. Marquette
Stephanie Ronan
Bernadette Earley
Review: castration – animal welfare considerations
Journal of Applied Animal Research
Castration
cattle
age
breed
castration methods
Burdizzo
title Review: castration – animal welfare considerations
title_full Review: castration – animal welfare considerations
title_fullStr Review: castration – animal welfare considerations
title_full_unstemmed Review: castration – animal welfare considerations
title_short Review: castration – animal welfare considerations
title_sort review castration animal welfare considerations
topic Castration
cattle
age
breed
castration methods
Burdizzo
url https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/09712119.2023.2273270
work_keys_str_mv AT gabrielaamarquette reviewcastrationanimalwelfareconsiderations
AT stephanieronan reviewcastrationanimalwelfareconsiderations
AT bernadetteearley reviewcastrationanimalwelfareconsiderations