Efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization monotherapy or combination conversion therapy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a highly malignant disease with poor prognosis, and most cases were already considered unresectable at the time of presentation. Conversion therapy, as an emerging treatment, is designed to provide patients with initially unresectable hepatocellular carcin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Weiwei Li, Yinxuan Pei, Zixiang Wang, Jinlong Liu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2022.930868/full
_version_ 1828430196731019264
author Weiwei Li
Yinxuan Pei
Zixiang Wang
Jinlong Liu
author_facet Weiwei Li
Yinxuan Pei
Zixiang Wang
Jinlong Liu
author_sort Weiwei Li
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a highly malignant disease with poor prognosis, and most cases were already considered unresectable at the time of presentation. Conversion therapy, as an emerging treatment, is designed to provide patients with initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) the opportunity to undergo radical resection. At present, conversion therapy for patients with uHCC remains controversial. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is currently the most widely selected treatment for uHCC, but its efficacy as a conversion therapy remains controversial.MethodsWe compared and evaluated the conversion rate for and tumor response to TACE monotherapy or combination therapy. Meanwhile, postoperative complications and overall survival (OS) in uHCC patients who underwent conversion therapy were also analyzed.ResultsA total of 18 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The conversion rate for triple therapy [TACE in combination with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)] was 42% [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.29–0.56], higher than any other group [TACE monotherapy: 10% (95% CI, 0.08–0.12), bigeminy therapy: 19% (95% CI, 0.06–0.36)]. Meanwhile, triple therapy yielded a better tumor response than TACE monotherapy or bigeminy therapy. Among the patients with successful surgical resection after conversion therapy, the pooled postoperative OS rates at 1, 2, and 5 years were 90% (95% CI, 0.81–0.97), 58% (95% CI, 0.42–0.73), and 42% (95% CI, 0.26–0.60), respectively, and the major postoperative complications were biliary leakage (7%; 95% CI, 0.03–0.12) and liver failure (3%; 95% CI, 0.00–0.07).ConclusionTACE conversion therapies showed good conversion rates, especially the triple therapy of TACE in combination with TKIs and ICIs. Surgical resection after successful conversion therapy could maximize the outcome of patients with uHCC.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T17:45:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d442e192ca3e46ccbb77dd0606b1a43b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2234-943X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T17:45:04Z
publishDate 2022-08-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Oncology
spelling doaj.art-d442e192ca3e46ccbb77dd0606b1a43b2022-12-22T01:39:16ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Oncology2234-943X2022-08-011210.3389/fonc.2022.930868930868Efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization monotherapy or combination conversion therapy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysisWeiwei LiYinxuan PeiZixiang WangJinlong LiuBackgroundHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a highly malignant disease with poor prognosis, and most cases were already considered unresectable at the time of presentation. Conversion therapy, as an emerging treatment, is designed to provide patients with initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) the opportunity to undergo radical resection. At present, conversion therapy for patients with uHCC remains controversial. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is currently the most widely selected treatment for uHCC, but its efficacy as a conversion therapy remains controversial.MethodsWe compared and evaluated the conversion rate for and tumor response to TACE monotherapy or combination therapy. Meanwhile, postoperative complications and overall survival (OS) in uHCC patients who underwent conversion therapy were also analyzed.ResultsA total of 18 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The conversion rate for triple therapy [TACE in combination with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)] was 42% [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.29–0.56], higher than any other group [TACE monotherapy: 10% (95% CI, 0.08–0.12), bigeminy therapy: 19% (95% CI, 0.06–0.36)]. Meanwhile, triple therapy yielded a better tumor response than TACE monotherapy or bigeminy therapy. Among the patients with successful surgical resection after conversion therapy, the pooled postoperative OS rates at 1, 2, and 5 years were 90% (95% CI, 0.81–0.97), 58% (95% CI, 0.42–0.73), and 42% (95% CI, 0.26–0.60), respectively, and the major postoperative complications were biliary leakage (7%; 95% CI, 0.03–0.12) and liver failure (3%; 95% CI, 0.00–0.07).ConclusionTACE conversion therapies showed good conversion rates, especially the triple therapy of TACE in combination with TKIs and ICIs. Surgical resection after successful conversion therapy could maximize the outcome of patients with uHCC.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2022.930868/fullconversion therapytransarterial chemoembolization (TACE)unresectableliver cancersurgery
spellingShingle Weiwei Li
Yinxuan Pei
Zixiang Wang
Jinlong Liu
Efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization monotherapy or combination conversion therapy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Frontiers in Oncology
conversion therapy
transarterial chemoembolization (TACE)
unresectable
liver cancer
surgery
title Efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization monotherapy or combination conversion therapy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization monotherapy or combination conversion therapy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization monotherapy or combination conversion therapy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization monotherapy or combination conversion therapy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization monotherapy or combination conversion therapy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization monotherapy or combination conversion therapy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma a systematic review and meta analysis
topic conversion therapy
transarterial chemoembolization (TACE)
unresectable
liver cancer
surgery
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2022.930868/full
work_keys_str_mv AT weiweili efficacyoftransarterialchemoembolizationmonotherapyorcombinationconversiontherapyinunresectablehepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yinxuanpei efficacyoftransarterialchemoembolizationmonotherapyorcombinationconversiontherapyinunresectablehepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zixiangwang efficacyoftransarterialchemoembolizationmonotherapyorcombinationconversiontherapyinunresectablehepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jinlongliu efficacyoftransarterialchemoembolizationmonotherapyorcombinationconversiontherapyinunresectablehepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis