Peroneal pedicle: An underutilized recipient vessel

Introduction: Anterior and Posterior tibial vessels are commonly used for anastomosis in lower limb reconstruction. There are situations when both of these vessels have inadequate flow or the lie of the adjacent vessel in relation to the flap is not conducive for total coverage of the defect. In the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hardeep Singh, Ankit Jain, Sanjay Mahendru, Rakesh Kumar Khazanchi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2020-01-01
Series:Turkish Journal of Plastic Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.turkjplastsurg.org/article.asp?issn=1300-6878;year=2020;volume=28;issue=3;spage=146;epage=151;aulast=Singh
_version_ 1818311416898125824
author Hardeep Singh
Ankit Jain
Sanjay Mahendru
Rakesh Kumar Khazanchi
author_facet Hardeep Singh
Ankit Jain
Sanjay Mahendru
Rakesh Kumar Khazanchi
author_sort Hardeep Singh
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Anterior and Posterior tibial vessels are commonly used for anastomosis in lower limb reconstruction. There are situations when both of these vessels have inadequate flow or the lie of the adjacent vessel in relation to the flap is not conducive for total coverage of the defect. In these situations, Peroneal pedicle can be used as the recipient vessel for free tissue transfer. We present our experience of using Peroneal pedicle as recipient vessel for successful free tissue transfer. Methods: All the patients undergoing free tissue transfer for lower limb reconstruction having anastomosis with Peroneal vessels were included. The patients fall under two groups. 1. Trauma- 6 patients with complex defect due to trauma had normal palpable distal pulsations at ankle but the target vessel was thrombosed, flap orientation was not conducive for the other vessel hence intraoperative decision to use Peroneal vessels was made. 2. Diabetic foot- Three patients had clinically non palpable pulsations at the ankle. They had biphasic flow in both the Tibial vessels and triphasic in peroneal as confirmed preoperatively with color Doppler. Free flaps were done using the anastomosis to Peroneal vessels. Results: Of 182 free flaps for lower limb reconstruction in last 4 years we have used Peroneal vessels as recipient pedicle in nine patients for successful free tissue transfer. All the flaps survived without any complication. Conclusion: Peroneal pedicle can be safely utilized as recipient vessel for free to free transfer in special situations. This is an underutilized pedicle to reconstruct many complex defects.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T08:01:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d455705bc62e4bc4b7103aad4c334d6d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2528-8644
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T08:01:37Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Turkish Journal of Plastic Surgery
spelling doaj.art-d455705bc62e4bc4b7103aad4c334d6d2022-12-21T23:54:25ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsTurkish Journal of Plastic Surgery2528-86442020-01-0128314615110.4103/tjps.tjps_55_19Peroneal pedicle: An underutilized recipient vesselHardeep SinghAnkit JainSanjay MahendruRakesh Kumar KhazanchiIntroduction: Anterior and Posterior tibial vessels are commonly used for anastomosis in lower limb reconstruction. There are situations when both of these vessels have inadequate flow or the lie of the adjacent vessel in relation to the flap is not conducive for total coverage of the defect. In these situations, Peroneal pedicle can be used as the recipient vessel for free tissue transfer. We present our experience of using Peroneal pedicle as recipient vessel for successful free tissue transfer. Methods: All the patients undergoing free tissue transfer for lower limb reconstruction having anastomosis with Peroneal vessels were included. The patients fall under two groups. 1. Trauma- 6 patients with complex defect due to trauma had normal palpable distal pulsations at ankle but the target vessel was thrombosed, flap orientation was not conducive for the other vessel hence intraoperative decision to use Peroneal vessels was made. 2. Diabetic foot- Three patients had clinically non palpable pulsations at the ankle. They had biphasic flow in both the Tibial vessels and triphasic in peroneal as confirmed preoperatively with color Doppler. Free flaps were done using the anastomosis to Peroneal vessels. Results: Of 182 free flaps for lower limb reconstruction in last 4 years we have used Peroneal vessels as recipient pedicle in nine patients for successful free tissue transfer. All the flaps survived without any complication. Conclusion: Peroneal pedicle can be safely utilized as recipient vessel for free to free transfer in special situations. This is an underutilized pedicle to reconstruct many complex defects.http://www.turkjplastsurg.org/article.asp?issn=1300-6878;year=2020;volume=28;issue=3;spage=146;epage=151;aulast=Singhanterior tibialperonealposterior tibial
spellingShingle Hardeep Singh
Ankit Jain
Sanjay Mahendru
Rakesh Kumar Khazanchi
Peroneal pedicle: An underutilized recipient vessel
Turkish Journal of Plastic Surgery
anterior tibial
peroneal
posterior tibial
title Peroneal pedicle: An underutilized recipient vessel
title_full Peroneal pedicle: An underutilized recipient vessel
title_fullStr Peroneal pedicle: An underutilized recipient vessel
title_full_unstemmed Peroneal pedicle: An underutilized recipient vessel
title_short Peroneal pedicle: An underutilized recipient vessel
title_sort peroneal pedicle an underutilized recipient vessel
topic anterior tibial
peroneal
posterior tibial
url http://www.turkjplastsurg.org/article.asp?issn=1300-6878;year=2020;volume=28;issue=3;spage=146;epage=151;aulast=Singh
work_keys_str_mv AT hardeepsingh peronealpedicleanunderutilizedrecipientvessel
AT ankitjain peronealpedicleanunderutilizedrecipientvessel
AT sanjaymahendru peronealpedicleanunderutilizedrecipientvessel
AT rakeshkumarkhazanchi peronealpedicleanunderutilizedrecipientvessel