Sensing Possibility in International Law – Concepts and Categories for the 21st Century: A Response to Fleur Johns
Fleur Johns raises the alarm regarding the potential for algorithmic analysis of big data to change fundamentally the way international lawyers and their allies gather and interpret facts to which international law is applied. Johns invites her readers to join her in seeking ways to...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cambridge University Press
2017-01-01
|
Series: | AJIL Unbound |
Online Access: | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2398772317000538/type/journal_article |
_version_ | 1811157378885746688 |
---|---|
author | Keith Culver |
author_facet | Keith Culver |
author_sort | Keith Culver |
collection | DOAJ |
description |
Fleur Johns raises the alarm regarding the potential for algorithmic analysis of big data to change fundamentally the way international lawyers and their allies gather and interpret facts to which international law is applied. Johns invites her readers to join her in seeking ways to save the aspirations of law on the “global plane” from these disruptive forces. In what follows I take up Johns’ invitation, in the spirit of its advancing claims “in a speculative or polemical mode,” asking the reader to withhold for a moment demands for completeness, instead joining in exploration of how the world of international law might be viewed differently if a larger version of Johns’ argument holds. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-10T05:05:16Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-d46f5ae0ce434c5d9d7914f0eeb57ca1 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2398-7723 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-10T05:05:16Z |
publishDate | 2017-01-01 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | Article |
series | AJIL Unbound |
spelling | doaj.art-d46f5ae0ce434c5d9d7914f0eeb57ca12023-03-09T12:27:10ZengCambridge University PressAJIL Unbound2398-77232017-01-0111120020410.1017/aju.2017.53Sensing Possibility in International Law – Concepts and Categories for the 21st Century: A Response to Fleur JohnsKeith Culver0Professor of Management, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, Canada. Fleur Johns raises the alarm regarding the potential for algorithmic analysis of big data to change fundamentally the way international lawyers and their allies gather and interpret facts to which international law is applied. Johns invites her readers to join her in seeking ways to save the aspirations of law on the “global plane” from these disruptive forces. In what follows I take up Johns’ invitation, in the spirit of its advancing claims “in a speculative or polemical mode,” asking the reader to withhold for a moment demands for completeness, instead joining in exploration of how the world of international law might be viewed differently if a larger version of Johns’ argument holds.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2398772317000538/type/journal_article |
spellingShingle | Keith Culver Sensing Possibility in International Law – Concepts and Categories for the 21st Century: A Response to Fleur Johns AJIL Unbound |
title | Sensing Possibility in International Law – Concepts and Categories for the 21st Century: A Response to Fleur Johns |
title_full | Sensing Possibility in International Law – Concepts and Categories for the 21st Century: A Response to Fleur Johns |
title_fullStr | Sensing Possibility in International Law – Concepts and Categories for the 21st Century: A Response to Fleur Johns |
title_full_unstemmed | Sensing Possibility in International Law – Concepts and Categories for the 21st Century: A Response to Fleur Johns |
title_short | Sensing Possibility in International Law – Concepts and Categories for the 21st Century: A Response to Fleur Johns |
title_sort | sensing possibility in international law concepts and categories for the 21st century a response to fleur johns |
url | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2398772317000538/type/journal_article |
work_keys_str_mv | AT keithculver sensingpossibilityininternationallawconceptsandcategoriesforthe21stcenturyaresponsetofleurjohns |