Abrasion wear resistance of different artificial teeth opposed to metal and composite antagonists

One of the most important properties of artificial teeth is the abrasion wear resistance, which is determinant in the maintenance of the rehabilitation's occlusal pattern. OBJECTIVES: This in vitro study aims to evaluate the abrasion wear resistance of 7 brands of artificial teeth opposed to tw...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pâmela Carbone Mello, Abílio Ricciardi Coppedê, Ana Paula Macedo, Maria da Gloria Chiarello de Mattos, Renata Cristina Silveira Rodrigues, Ricardo Faria Ribeiro
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of São Paulo 2009-10-01
Series:Journal of Applied Oral Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572009000500019
_version_ 1818033317971230720
author Pâmela Carbone Mello
Abílio Ricciardi Coppedê
Ana Paula Macedo
Maria da Gloria Chiarello de Mattos
Renata Cristina Silveira Rodrigues
Ricardo Faria Ribeiro
author_facet Pâmela Carbone Mello
Abílio Ricciardi Coppedê
Ana Paula Macedo
Maria da Gloria Chiarello de Mattos
Renata Cristina Silveira Rodrigues
Ricardo Faria Ribeiro
author_sort Pâmela Carbone Mello
collection DOAJ
description One of the most important properties of artificial teeth is the abrasion wear resistance, which is determinant in the maintenance of the rehabilitation's occlusal pattern. OBJECTIVES: This in vitro study aims to evaluate the abrasion wear resistance of 7 brands of artificial teeth opposed to two types of antagonists. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seven groups were prepared with 12 specimens each (BIOLUX & BL, TRILUX & TR, BLUE DENT & BD, BIOCLER & BC, POSTARIS & PO, ORTHOSIT & OR, GNATHOSTAR & GN), opposed to metallic (M & nickel-chromium alloy), and to composite antagonists (C & Solidex indirect composite). A mechanical loading device was used (240 cycles/min, 4 Hz speed, 10 mm antagonist course). Initial and final contours of each specimen were registered with aid of a profile projector (20x magnification). The linear difference between the two profiles was measured and the registered values were subjected to ANOVA and Tukey's test. RESULTS: Regarding the antagonists, only OR (M = 10.45 ± 1.42 µm and C = 2.77 ± 0.69 µm) and BC (M = 6.70 ± 1.37 µm and C = 4.48 ± 0.80 µm) presented statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). Best results were obtained with PO (C = 2.33 ± 0.91 µm and M = 1.78 ± 0.42 µm), followed by BL (C = 3.70 ± 1.32 µm and M = 3.70 ± 0.61 µm), statistically similar for both antagonists (p>0.05). Greater result variance was obtained with OR, which presented the worse results opposed to Ni-Cr (10.45 ± 1.42 µm), and results similar to the best ones against composite (2.77 ± 0.69 µm). CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this study, it may be concluded that the antagonist material is a factor of major importance to be considered in the choice of the artificial teeth to be used in the prosthesis.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T06:21:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d47664a51baf4d90a16b4297aaf2732f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1678-7757
1678-7765
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T06:21:21Z
publishDate 2009-10-01
publisher University of São Paulo
record_format Article
series Journal of Applied Oral Science
spelling doaj.art-d47664a51baf4d90a16b4297aaf2732f2022-12-22T01:59:20ZengUniversity of São PauloJournal of Applied Oral Science1678-77571678-77652009-10-0117545145610.1590/S1678-77572009000500019Abrasion wear resistance of different artificial teeth opposed to metal and composite antagonistsPâmela Carbone MelloAbílio Ricciardi CoppedêAna Paula MacedoMaria da Gloria Chiarello de MattosRenata Cristina Silveira RodriguesRicardo Faria RibeiroOne of the most important properties of artificial teeth is the abrasion wear resistance, which is determinant in the maintenance of the rehabilitation's occlusal pattern. OBJECTIVES: This in vitro study aims to evaluate the abrasion wear resistance of 7 brands of artificial teeth opposed to two types of antagonists. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seven groups were prepared with 12 specimens each (BIOLUX & BL, TRILUX & TR, BLUE DENT & BD, BIOCLER & BC, POSTARIS & PO, ORTHOSIT & OR, GNATHOSTAR & GN), opposed to metallic (M & nickel-chromium alloy), and to composite antagonists (C & Solidex indirect composite). A mechanical loading device was used (240 cycles/min, 4 Hz speed, 10 mm antagonist course). Initial and final contours of each specimen were registered with aid of a profile projector (20x magnification). The linear difference between the two profiles was measured and the registered values were subjected to ANOVA and Tukey's test. RESULTS: Regarding the antagonists, only OR (M = 10.45 ± 1.42 µm and C = 2.77 ± 0.69 µm) and BC (M = 6.70 ± 1.37 µm and C = 4.48 ± 0.80 µm) presented statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). Best results were obtained with PO (C = 2.33 ± 0.91 µm and M = 1.78 ± 0.42 µm), followed by BL (C = 3.70 ± 1.32 µm and M = 3.70 ± 0.61 µm), statistically similar for both antagonists (p>0.05). Greater result variance was obtained with OR, which presented the worse results opposed to Ni-Cr (10.45 ± 1.42 µm), and results similar to the best ones against composite (2.77 ± 0.69 µm). CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this study, it may be concluded that the antagonist material is a factor of major importance to be considered in the choice of the artificial teeth to be used in the prosthesis.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572009000500019Tooth, artificialComparative studyTooth abrasion
spellingShingle Pâmela Carbone Mello
Abílio Ricciardi Coppedê
Ana Paula Macedo
Maria da Gloria Chiarello de Mattos
Renata Cristina Silveira Rodrigues
Ricardo Faria Ribeiro
Abrasion wear resistance of different artificial teeth opposed to metal and composite antagonists
Journal of Applied Oral Science
Tooth, artificial
Comparative study
Tooth abrasion
title Abrasion wear resistance of different artificial teeth opposed to metal and composite antagonists
title_full Abrasion wear resistance of different artificial teeth opposed to metal and composite antagonists
title_fullStr Abrasion wear resistance of different artificial teeth opposed to metal and composite antagonists
title_full_unstemmed Abrasion wear resistance of different artificial teeth opposed to metal and composite antagonists
title_short Abrasion wear resistance of different artificial teeth opposed to metal and composite antagonists
title_sort abrasion wear resistance of different artificial teeth opposed to metal and composite antagonists
topic Tooth, artificial
Comparative study
Tooth abrasion
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572009000500019
work_keys_str_mv AT pamelacarbonemello abrasionwearresistanceofdifferentartificialteethopposedtometalandcompositeantagonists
AT abilioricciardicoppede abrasionwearresistanceofdifferentartificialteethopposedtometalandcompositeantagonists
AT anapaulamacedo abrasionwearresistanceofdifferentartificialteethopposedtometalandcompositeantagonists
AT mariadagloriachiarellodemattos abrasionwearresistanceofdifferentartificialteethopposedtometalandcompositeantagonists
AT renatacristinasilveirarodrigues abrasionwearresistanceofdifferentartificialteethopposedtometalandcompositeantagonists
AT ricardofariaribeiro abrasionwearresistanceofdifferentartificialteethopposedtometalandcompositeantagonists