When Plaquing Is Not Possible: Computational Methods for Detecting Induced Phages

High-throughput sequencing of microbial communities has uncovered a large, diverse population of phages. Frequently, phages found are integrated into their bacterial host genome. Distinguishing between phages in their integrated (lysogenic) and unintegrated (lytic) stage can provide insight into how...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Taylor Miller-Ensminger, Genevieve Johnson, Swarnali Banerjee, Catherine Putonti
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-02-01
Series:Viruses
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/15/2/420
_version_ 1827755223349723136
author Taylor Miller-Ensminger
Genevieve Johnson
Swarnali Banerjee
Catherine Putonti
author_facet Taylor Miller-Ensminger
Genevieve Johnson
Swarnali Banerjee
Catherine Putonti
author_sort Taylor Miller-Ensminger
collection DOAJ
description High-throughput sequencing of microbial communities has uncovered a large, diverse population of phages. Frequently, phages found are integrated into their bacterial host genome. Distinguishing between phages in their integrated (lysogenic) and unintegrated (lytic) stage can provide insight into how phages shape bacterial communities. Here we present the Prophage Induction Estimator (PIE) to identify induced phages in genomic and metagenomic sequences. PIE takes raw sequencing reads and phage sequence predictions, performs read quality control, read assembly, and calculation of phage and non-phage sequence abundance and completeness. The distribution of abundances for non-phage sequences is used to predict induced phages with statistical confidence. In silico tests were conducted to benchmark this tool finding that PIE can detect induction events as well as phages with a relatively small burst size (10×). We then examined isolate genome sequencing data as well as a mock community and urinary metagenome data sets and found instances of induced phages in all three data sets. The flexibility of this software enables users to easily include phage predictions from their preferred tool of choice or phage sequences of interest. Thus, genomic and metagenomic sequencing now not only provides a means for discovering and identifying phage sequences but also the detection of induced prophages.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T08:01:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d47c69831c8f45cdb8ab2c40c951a4d0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1999-4915
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T08:01:08Z
publishDate 2023-02-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Viruses
spelling doaj.art-d47c69831c8f45cdb8ab2c40c951a4d02023-11-16T23:48:46ZengMDPI AGViruses1999-49152023-02-0115242010.3390/v15020420When Plaquing Is Not Possible: Computational Methods for Detecting Induced PhagesTaylor Miller-Ensminger0Genevieve Johnson1Swarnali Banerjee2Catherine Putonti3Bioinformatics Program, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL 60660, USABioinformatics Program, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL 60660, USADepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL 60660, USABioinformatics Program, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL 60660, USAHigh-throughput sequencing of microbial communities has uncovered a large, diverse population of phages. Frequently, phages found are integrated into their bacterial host genome. Distinguishing between phages in their integrated (lysogenic) and unintegrated (lytic) stage can provide insight into how phages shape bacterial communities. Here we present the Prophage Induction Estimator (PIE) to identify induced phages in genomic and metagenomic sequences. PIE takes raw sequencing reads and phage sequence predictions, performs read quality control, read assembly, and calculation of phage and non-phage sequence abundance and completeness. The distribution of abundances for non-phage sequences is used to predict induced phages with statistical confidence. In silico tests were conducted to benchmark this tool finding that PIE can detect induction events as well as phages with a relatively small burst size (10×). We then examined isolate genome sequencing data as well as a mock community and urinary metagenome data sets and found instances of induced phages in all three data sets. The flexibility of this software enables users to easily include phage predictions from their preferred tool of choice or phage sequences of interest. Thus, genomic and metagenomic sequencing now not only provides a means for discovering and identifying phage sequences but also the detection of induced prophages.https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/15/2/420prophageinductiontemperate phagesmetagenomicsgenomics
spellingShingle Taylor Miller-Ensminger
Genevieve Johnson
Swarnali Banerjee
Catherine Putonti
When Plaquing Is Not Possible: Computational Methods for Detecting Induced Phages
Viruses
prophage
induction
temperate phages
metagenomics
genomics
title When Plaquing Is Not Possible: Computational Methods for Detecting Induced Phages
title_full When Plaquing Is Not Possible: Computational Methods for Detecting Induced Phages
title_fullStr When Plaquing Is Not Possible: Computational Methods for Detecting Induced Phages
title_full_unstemmed When Plaquing Is Not Possible: Computational Methods for Detecting Induced Phages
title_short When Plaquing Is Not Possible: Computational Methods for Detecting Induced Phages
title_sort when plaquing is not possible computational methods for detecting induced phages
topic prophage
induction
temperate phages
metagenomics
genomics
url https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/15/2/420
work_keys_str_mv AT taylormillerensminger whenplaquingisnotpossiblecomputationalmethodsfordetectinginducedphages
AT genevievejohnson whenplaquingisnotpossiblecomputationalmethodsfordetectinginducedphages
AT swarnalibanerjee whenplaquingisnotpossiblecomputationalmethodsfordetectinginducedphages
AT catherineputonti whenplaquingisnotpossiblecomputationalmethodsfordetectinginducedphages