Conservative treatment of cervical cancer: A single center experience over a two-decade period

Objective: To report the surgical, oncological, and obstetrical outcomes of the different surgical techniques used for the fertility-sparing treatment of patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed all fertility-sparing procedures performed between 2004 and 2020....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Guido M. Rey Valzacchi, Diego Odetto, José M. Saadi, Liliana B. Zamora, Candela Loza, Milagros Medina, Myriam B. Perrotta
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-08-01
Series:Gynecologic Oncology Reports
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352578923000954
_version_ 1797753986326986752
author Guido M. Rey Valzacchi
Diego Odetto
José M. Saadi
Liliana B. Zamora
Candela Loza
Milagros Medina
Myriam B. Perrotta
author_facet Guido M. Rey Valzacchi
Diego Odetto
José M. Saadi
Liliana B. Zamora
Candela Loza
Milagros Medina
Myriam B. Perrotta
author_sort Guido M. Rey Valzacchi
collection DOAJ
description Objective: To report the surgical, oncological, and obstetrical outcomes of the different surgical techniques used for the fertility-sparing treatment of patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed all fertility-sparing procedures performed between 2004 and 2020. The study included patients desiring to preserve fertility who had squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, and adenosquamous carcinoma histology, all grades, and FIGO 2009 stage IA2-IB1 tumors. Results: 48 patients met the inclusion criteria. Eight patients (16.7%) had stage IA2, and 40 (83.3%) had stage IB1 tumors. Conization with pelvic lymph node assessment was performed in 5 (10.4%) patients, an open radical trachelectomy in 21 (43.8%), and a laparoscopic radical trachelectomy in 22 (45.8%). No major intraoperative complications were registered. Two patients required surgery due to an early postoperative complication. Late postoperative complications were seen in 15 patients (31.2%), with cervical stenosis being the most frequent (60%). The rate of DFS at 2 and 5 years was 89% (95% CI, 76–95%), and the 5- year OS was 96% (95% CI, 83–98%). Univariate analysis demonstrated a relationship between tumor size and recurrence, but not for other prognostic tumor factors or surgical approach. One patient (4.8%) developed recurrent disease in the open radical trachelectomy group, and five (22.7%) in the laparoscopic radical trachelectomy group. The pregnancy rate was 41.4%, and the live birth rate 88.2%. Conclusion: Fertility-sparing treatment for patients with early-stage cervical cancer is ever-evolving. This study adds information to the literature about the outcomes of these quite uncommon procedures, and allows a critical analysis of many of the topics which are under discussion.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T17:26:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d47e49030e604209a64fc2d8aeecd2d9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2352-5789
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T17:26:57Z
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Gynecologic Oncology Reports
spelling doaj.art-d47e49030e604209a64fc2d8aeecd2d92023-08-05T05:16:12ZengElsevierGynecologic Oncology Reports2352-57892023-08-0148101226Conservative treatment of cervical cancer: A single center experience over a two-decade periodGuido M. Rey Valzacchi0Diego Odetto1José M. Saadi2Liliana B. Zamora3Candela Loza4Milagros Medina5Myriam B. Perrotta6Corresponding author at: Department of Gynecology, Hospital Italiano of Buenos Aires, Potosi 4135, Zip Code 1199, Buenos Aires, Argentina.; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Hospital Italiano of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, ArgentinaDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Hospital Italiano of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, ArgentinaDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Hospital Italiano of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, ArgentinaDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Hospital Italiano of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, ArgentinaDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Hospital Italiano of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, ArgentinaDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Hospital Italiano of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, ArgentinaDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Hospital Italiano of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, ArgentinaObjective: To report the surgical, oncological, and obstetrical outcomes of the different surgical techniques used for the fertility-sparing treatment of patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed all fertility-sparing procedures performed between 2004 and 2020. The study included patients desiring to preserve fertility who had squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, and adenosquamous carcinoma histology, all grades, and FIGO 2009 stage IA2-IB1 tumors. Results: 48 patients met the inclusion criteria. Eight patients (16.7%) had stage IA2, and 40 (83.3%) had stage IB1 tumors. Conization with pelvic lymph node assessment was performed in 5 (10.4%) patients, an open radical trachelectomy in 21 (43.8%), and a laparoscopic radical trachelectomy in 22 (45.8%). No major intraoperative complications were registered. Two patients required surgery due to an early postoperative complication. Late postoperative complications were seen in 15 patients (31.2%), with cervical stenosis being the most frequent (60%). The rate of DFS at 2 and 5 years was 89% (95% CI, 76–95%), and the 5- year OS was 96% (95% CI, 83–98%). Univariate analysis demonstrated a relationship between tumor size and recurrence, but not for other prognostic tumor factors or surgical approach. One patient (4.8%) developed recurrent disease in the open radical trachelectomy group, and five (22.7%) in the laparoscopic radical trachelectomy group. The pregnancy rate was 41.4%, and the live birth rate 88.2%. Conclusion: Fertility-sparing treatment for patients with early-stage cervical cancer is ever-evolving. This study adds information to the literature about the outcomes of these quite uncommon procedures, and allows a critical analysis of many of the topics which are under discussion.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352578923000954
spellingShingle Guido M. Rey Valzacchi
Diego Odetto
José M. Saadi
Liliana B. Zamora
Candela Loza
Milagros Medina
Myriam B. Perrotta
Conservative treatment of cervical cancer: A single center experience over a two-decade period
Gynecologic Oncology Reports
title Conservative treatment of cervical cancer: A single center experience over a two-decade period
title_full Conservative treatment of cervical cancer: A single center experience over a two-decade period
title_fullStr Conservative treatment of cervical cancer: A single center experience over a two-decade period
title_full_unstemmed Conservative treatment of cervical cancer: A single center experience over a two-decade period
title_short Conservative treatment of cervical cancer: A single center experience over a two-decade period
title_sort conservative treatment of cervical cancer a single center experience over a two decade period
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352578923000954
work_keys_str_mv AT guidomreyvalzacchi conservativetreatmentofcervicalcancerasinglecenterexperienceoveratwodecadeperiod
AT diegoodetto conservativetreatmentofcervicalcancerasinglecenterexperienceoveratwodecadeperiod
AT josemsaadi conservativetreatmentofcervicalcancerasinglecenterexperienceoveratwodecadeperiod
AT lilianabzamora conservativetreatmentofcervicalcancerasinglecenterexperienceoveratwodecadeperiod
AT candelaloza conservativetreatmentofcervicalcancerasinglecenterexperienceoveratwodecadeperiod
AT milagrosmedina conservativetreatmentofcervicalcancerasinglecenterexperienceoveratwodecadeperiod
AT myriambperrotta conservativetreatmentofcervicalcancerasinglecenterexperienceoveratwodecadeperiod