Liquid mean residence time (MRT) in rotating packed bed (RPB) by empirical correlation and residence time distribution (RTD) method using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation

Rotating packed bed (RPB) belongs to a HIGee technology, a process intensification device that can provide better mass transfer rate due to the generation of hyper-gravity under the influence of centrifugal force. While determining the efficiency of the RPB, the MRT of the liquid plays a vital role....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zahir Abdul, Kumar Perumal, Saptoro Agus, Tiong Angnes Ngieng Tze, Hameed Samreen, Shah Milinkumar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2023-01-01
Series:MATEC Web of Conferences
Online Access:https://www.matec-conferences.org/articles/matecconf/pdf/2023/04/matecconf_cgchdrc2022_01018.pdf
_version_ 1797843669966913536
author Zahir Abdul
Kumar Perumal
Saptoro Agus
Tiong Angnes Ngieng Tze
Hameed Samreen
Shah Milinkumar
author_facet Zahir Abdul
Kumar Perumal
Saptoro Agus
Tiong Angnes Ngieng Tze
Hameed Samreen
Shah Milinkumar
author_sort Zahir Abdul
collection DOAJ
description Rotating packed bed (RPB) belongs to a HIGee technology, a process intensification device that can provide better mass transfer rate due to the generation of hyper-gravity under the influence of centrifugal force. While determining the efficiency of the RPB, the MRT of the liquid plays a vital role. The MRT of the RPB is very small and can be tuned in accordance with the mass transfer rate of the solvent to achieve the required outlet concentration of the absorbed gas. There exist two methods, i.e., empirical correlation and the residence time distribution (RTD) method. The applicability of both methods still needs to be investigated for better prediction of MRT in RPB. The current study compares the MRT of the two of the most widely employed techniques, i.e., MRT by empirical correlation and the RTD approach using the Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD). The difference between the MRT by both methods lies between 30-38%. The results show that the RTD better predicts the MRT in the RPB as compared to the Burns empirical correlation.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T17:09:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d47fadca108d464d88184cb1427943c3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2261-236X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T17:09:07Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher EDP Sciences
record_format Article
series MATEC Web of Conferences
spelling doaj.art-d47fadca108d464d88184cb1427943c32023-04-20T08:28:09ZengEDP SciencesMATEC Web of Conferences2261-236X2023-01-013770101810.1051/matecconf/202337701018matecconf_cgchdrc2022_01018Liquid mean residence time (MRT) in rotating packed bed (RPB) by empirical correlation and residence time distribution (RTD) method using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulationZahir Abdul0Kumar Perumal1Saptoro Agus2Tiong Angnes Ngieng Tze3Hameed Samreen4Shah Milinkumar5Department of Chemical and Energy Engineering, Curtin University MalaysiaDepartment of Chemical and Energy Engineering, Curtin University MalaysiaDepartment of Chemical and Energy Engineering, Curtin University MalaysiaDepartment of Chemical and Energy Engineering, Curtin University MalaysiaDepartment of Chemical, Polymer & Composite Material Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, New CampusWestern Australia School of Mines: Mineral, Energy and Chemical Engineering, Curtin UniversityRotating packed bed (RPB) belongs to a HIGee technology, a process intensification device that can provide better mass transfer rate due to the generation of hyper-gravity under the influence of centrifugal force. While determining the efficiency of the RPB, the MRT of the liquid plays a vital role. The MRT of the RPB is very small and can be tuned in accordance with the mass transfer rate of the solvent to achieve the required outlet concentration of the absorbed gas. There exist two methods, i.e., empirical correlation and the residence time distribution (RTD) method. The applicability of both methods still needs to be investigated for better prediction of MRT in RPB. The current study compares the MRT of the two of the most widely employed techniques, i.e., MRT by empirical correlation and the RTD approach using the Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD). The difference between the MRT by both methods lies between 30-38%. The results show that the RTD better predicts the MRT in the RPB as compared to the Burns empirical correlation.https://www.matec-conferences.org/articles/matecconf/pdf/2023/04/matecconf_cgchdrc2022_01018.pdf
spellingShingle Zahir Abdul
Kumar Perumal
Saptoro Agus
Tiong Angnes Ngieng Tze
Hameed Samreen
Shah Milinkumar
Liquid mean residence time (MRT) in rotating packed bed (RPB) by empirical correlation and residence time distribution (RTD) method using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation
MATEC Web of Conferences
title Liquid mean residence time (MRT) in rotating packed bed (RPB) by empirical correlation and residence time distribution (RTD) method using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation
title_full Liquid mean residence time (MRT) in rotating packed bed (RPB) by empirical correlation and residence time distribution (RTD) method using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation
title_fullStr Liquid mean residence time (MRT) in rotating packed bed (RPB) by empirical correlation and residence time distribution (RTD) method using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation
title_full_unstemmed Liquid mean residence time (MRT) in rotating packed bed (RPB) by empirical correlation and residence time distribution (RTD) method using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation
title_short Liquid mean residence time (MRT) in rotating packed bed (RPB) by empirical correlation and residence time distribution (RTD) method using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation
title_sort liquid mean residence time mrt in rotating packed bed rpb by empirical correlation and residence time distribution rtd method using computational fluid dynamics cfd simulation
url https://www.matec-conferences.org/articles/matecconf/pdf/2023/04/matecconf_cgchdrc2022_01018.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT zahirabdul liquidmeanresidencetimemrtinrotatingpackedbedrpbbyempiricalcorrelationandresidencetimedistributionrtdmethodusingcomputationalfluiddynamicscfdsimulation
AT kumarperumal liquidmeanresidencetimemrtinrotatingpackedbedrpbbyempiricalcorrelationandresidencetimedistributionrtdmethodusingcomputationalfluiddynamicscfdsimulation
AT saptoroagus liquidmeanresidencetimemrtinrotatingpackedbedrpbbyempiricalcorrelationandresidencetimedistributionrtdmethodusingcomputationalfluiddynamicscfdsimulation
AT tiongangnesngiengtze liquidmeanresidencetimemrtinrotatingpackedbedrpbbyempiricalcorrelationandresidencetimedistributionrtdmethodusingcomputationalfluiddynamicscfdsimulation
AT hameedsamreen liquidmeanresidencetimemrtinrotatingpackedbedrpbbyempiricalcorrelationandresidencetimedistributionrtdmethodusingcomputationalfluiddynamicscfdsimulation
AT shahmilinkumar liquidmeanresidencetimemrtinrotatingpackedbedrpbbyempiricalcorrelationandresidencetimedistributionrtdmethodusingcomputationalfluiddynamicscfdsimulation