Are formalised implementation activities associated with aspects of quality of care in general practice? A cross-sectional study
Background: There is a substantial variation in how different general practices manage knowledge implementation, including the degree to which activities are collectively and formally organised. Yet, it is unclear how these differences in implementation activities affect quality of care. Aim: To inv...
Main Authors: | Jette V Le, Jesper Lykkegaard, Line B Pedersen, Helle Riisgaard, Jørgen Nexøe, Jeanette Lemmergaard, Jens Søndergaard |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Royal College of General Practitioners
2017-04-01
|
Series: | BJGP Open |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://bjgpopen.org/content/1/2/bjgpopen17X100737 |
Similar Items
-
Nursing managers' perspectives on facilitators of and barriers to evidence‐based practice: A cross‐sectional study
by: Fatemeh Hosseini‐Moghaddam, et al.
Published: (2023-09-01) -
Knowledge, attitude and behaviour to evidence-based practice among psychiatric nurses: A cross-sectional survey
by: Ce Li, et al.
Published: (2022-07-01) -
A cross-sectional study evaluating the knowledge, attitude, and practice of evidence-based medicine among resident doctors of a health-care Institution of National Importance in India
by: Indumathi Prabath, et al.
Published: (2023-01-01) -
Attitudes, skills and implementation of evidence-based practice: a national cross-sectional survey of licensed naprapaths in Sweden
by: Tobias Sundberg, et al.
Published: (2023-01-01) -
How is evidence to be understood in modern coaching psychology?
by: Ole Michael Spaten, et al.
Published: (2015-12-01)