Comparison of Offline, Real-Time Models and Hardware-in-the-Loop Test Results of a Power Take-Off for Wave Energy Applications
The power take-off (PTO) of a wave energy converter (WEC) converts mechanical power extracted from the waves into electrical power. Increasing PTO performance under several operational conditions is therefore essential to reduce the levelized cost of energy of a given wave energy concept and to achi...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2022-11-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Marine Science and Engineering |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1312/10/11/1744 |
| _version_ | 1797464927665913856 |
|---|---|
| author | Luca Castellini Federico Gallorini Giacomo Alessandri Erick Fernando Alves Dan Montoya Bhavana Mudigonda Elisabetta Tedeschi |
| author_facet | Luca Castellini Federico Gallorini Giacomo Alessandri Erick Fernando Alves Dan Montoya Bhavana Mudigonda Elisabetta Tedeschi |
| author_sort | Luca Castellini |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The power take-off (PTO) of a wave energy converter (WEC) converts mechanical power extracted from the waves into electrical power. Increasing PTO performance under several operational conditions is therefore essential to reduce the levelized cost of energy of a given wave energy concept and to achieve higher levels of technology readiness. A key task in the WEC design will then be the holistic assessment of the PTO performance in combination with other subsystems. It is hence important that WEC designers are aware of the different modeling options. This paper addresses this need and presents two alternative wave-to-wire modeling approaches based on a 250 kW modular electromechanical PTO coupled to an oscillating wave surge converter (OWSC) device. The first is a detailed and accurate offline model. The second model is a simplified and faster version of the first, being adequate for rapid analyses and real-time (RT) simulation. The paper presents the benchmarking of the offline model against the RT model and the hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) tests of the PTO. The normalized root-mean-square error (NRMSE) is considered as a quantitative indicator for the measurement of real-time and HIL test results against the offline simulation. Results show that the dynamics of the offline model are well represented by the RT model with execution times up to 10 times faster. The offline model also depicts well the behavior observed in the HIL tests with the NRMSE values for the PTO position, velocity, and force above 0.90, which shows the HIL test results replicates with fidelity the dynamic behavior of the complete model. Meaningful differences are however present and highlighted in this paper. An understanding of the advantages and drawbacks of these three approaches is fundamental to properly design a WEC during its project cycle and validate PTO concepts with a certain level of simplification. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-09T18:14:09Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-d49006a817a34b21bebdec4f2802bee9 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2077-1312 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-09T18:14:09Z |
| publishDate | 2022-11-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Marine Science and Engineering |
| spelling | doaj.art-d49006a817a34b21bebdec4f2802bee92023-11-24T08:52:11ZengMDPI AGJournal of Marine Science and Engineering2077-13122022-11-011011174410.3390/jmse10111744Comparison of Offline, Real-Time Models and Hardware-in-the-Loop Test Results of a Power Take-Off for Wave Energy ApplicationsLuca Castellini0Federico Gallorini1Giacomo Alessandri2Erick Fernando Alves3Dan Montoya4Bhavana Mudigonda5Elisabetta Tedeschi6UMBRAGROUP s.p.a, 06034 Foligno, ItalyVGA S.R.L., 06053 Deruta, ItalyVGA S.R.L., 06053 Deruta, ItalyDepartment of Electric Power Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 7034 Trondheim, NorwayDepartment of Electric Power Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 7034 Trondheim, NorwayDepartment of Electric Power Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 7034 Trondheim, NorwayDepartment of Electric Power Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 7034 Trondheim, NorwayThe power take-off (PTO) of a wave energy converter (WEC) converts mechanical power extracted from the waves into electrical power. Increasing PTO performance under several operational conditions is therefore essential to reduce the levelized cost of energy of a given wave energy concept and to achieve higher levels of technology readiness. A key task in the WEC design will then be the holistic assessment of the PTO performance in combination with other subsystems. It is hence important that WEC designers are aware of the different modeling options. This paper addresses this need and presents two alternative wave-to-wire modeling approaches based on a 250 kW modular electromechanical PTO coupled to an oscillating wave surge converter (OWSC) device. The first is a detailed and accurate offline model. The second model is a simplified and faster version of the first, being adequate for rapid analyses and real-time (RT) simulation. The paper presents the benchmarking of the offline model against the RT model and the hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) tests of the PTO. The normalized root-mean-square error (NRMSE) is considered as a quantitative indicator for the measurement of real-time and HIL test results against the offline simulation. Results show that the dynamics of the offline model are well represented by the RT model with execution times up to 10 times faster. The offline model also depicts well the behavior observed in the HIL tests with the NRMSE values for the PTO position, velocity, and force above 0.90, which shows the HIL test results replicates with fidelity the dynamic behavior of the complete model. Meaningful differences are however present and highlighted in this paper. An understanding of the advantages and drawbacks of these three approaches is fundamental to properly design a WEC during its project cycle and validate PTO concepts with a certain level of simplification.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1312/10/11/1744wave energy conversionsystems modelingpower take-offballscrewelectric generatortest bench |
| spellingShingle | Luca Castellini Federico Gallorini Giacomo Alessandri Erick Fernando Alves Dan Montoya Bhavana Mudigonda Elisabetta Tedeschi Comparison of Offline, Real-Time Models and Hardware-in-the-Loop Test Results of a Power Take-Off for Wave Energy Applications Journal of Marine Science and Engineering wave energy conversion systems modeling power take-off ballscrew electric generator test bench |
| title | Comparison of Offline, Real-Time Models and Hardware-in-the-Loop Test Results of a Power Take-Off for Wave Energy Applications |
| title_full | Comparison of Offline, Real-Time Models and Hardware-in-the-Loop Test Results of a Power Take-Off for Wave Energy Applications |
| title_fullStr | Comparison of Offline, Real-Time Models and Hardware-in-the-Loop Test Results of a Power Take-Off for Wave Energy Applications |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Offline, Real-Time Models and Hardware-in-the-Loop Test Results of a Power Take-Off for Wave Energy Applications |
| title_short | Comparison of Offline, Real-Time Models and Hardware-in-the-Loop Test Results of a Power Take-Off for Wave Energy Applications |
| title_sort | comparison of offline real time models and hardware in the loop test results of a power take off for wave energy applications |
| topic | wave energy conversion systems modeling power take-off ballscrew electric generator test bench |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1312/10/11/1744 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT lucacastellini comparisonofofflinerealtimemodelsandhardwareinthelooptestresultsofapowertakeoffforwaveenergyapplications AT federicogallorini comparisonofofflinerealtimemodelsandhardwareinthelooptestresultsofapowertakeoffforwaveenergyapplications AT giacomoalessandri comparisonofofflinerealtimemodelsandhardwareinthelooptestresultsofapowertakeoffforwaveenergyapplications AT erickfernandoalves comparisonofofflinerealtimemodelsandhardwareinthelooptestresultsofapowertakeoffforwaveenergyapplications AT danmontoya comparisonofofflinerealtimemodelsandhardwareinthelooptestresultsofapowertakeoffforwaveenergyapplications AT bhavanamudigonda comparisonofofflinerealtimemodelsandhardwareinthelooptestresultsofapowertakeoffforwaveenergyapplications AT elisabettatedeschi comparisonofofflinerealtimemodelsandhardwareinthelooptestresultsofapowertakeoffforwaveenergyapplications |