Short-term results after minimally invasive and open liver resection for liver metastases of colorectal cancer: a single center experience

Rationale: Until now, safety of minimally invasive liver resection (MILR) has not been studied sufficiently.Aim: To assess immediate results of MILR and open type resections in patients with colorectal metastases, performed in the Russian center of surgical hepatology specialized at implementation o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M. G. Efanov, R. B. Alikhanov, V. V. Tsvirkun, I. V. Kazakov, P. P. Kim, А. N. Vankovich, K. D. Grendal, Е. N. Zamanov
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: MONIKI 2018-11-01
Series:Alʹmanah Kliničeskoj Mediciny
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.almclinmed.ru/jour/article/view/897
_version_ 1818642378050764800
author M. G. Efanov
R. B. Alikhanov
V. V. Tsvirkun
I. V. Kazakov
P. P. Kim
А. N. Vankovich
K. D. Grendal
Е. N. Zamanov
author_facet M. G. Efanov
R. B. Alikhanov
V. V. Tsvirkun
I. V. Kazakov
P. P. Kim
А. N. Vankovich
K. D. Grendal
Е. N. Zamanov
author_sort M. G. Efanov
collection DOAJ
description Rationale: Until now, safety of minimally invasive liver resection (MILR) has not been studied sufficiently.Aim: To assess immediate results of MILR and open type resections in patients with colorectal metastases, performed in the Russian center of surgical hepatology specialized at implementation of minimally invasive techniques.Materials and мethods: This was a retrospective observational case-control study. Patients who underwent surgery for isolated liver metastases of colorectal cancer in a  single center from October 2013 to February 2018 were included into the study.Results: As per December 2017, over 500 resections have been performed in the study center, including 226 MILR. One hundred two patients underwent open resection and MILR for colorectal metastases. From 83 patients enrolled into the study, 51 (61%) had MILR, including 7 robotic MILR. The open resection and MILR groups did not differ in terms of gender, age, ASA score, primary tumors location and stage by the time of primary intervention. There were no between-group differences for factors that determine the tumor spread and influence the resection problems, i.e. the difficulty index of MILR, rate of anatomic resection, resection of complex segments, vascular involvement, size and number of metastases, multiple liver lesions and bilobar metastases. No difference was found for immediate outcomes in terms of frequency of the free surgical margin > 2 mm, rate of the Pringle maneuver implementation, duration of the procedure, blood components transfusion, severe complications (Clavien-Dindo Grade > II), and time in intensive care unit. Compared to open procedures, MILR were associated with significantly less blood loss: 583 (50–3000) mL vs. 308 (0–3300) mL (p = 0.012), respectively, and shorter duration of hospital stay: 10 (4–29) days vs. 9 (4–29) days (р < 0.001), respectively.Conclusion: In a specialized surgical hepatology center, MILR can be performed equally to complex open procedures without changes in the rates and types of complications, but with an improvement of immediate outcomes.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T23:42:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d4a749a6fd18416da479ab1f018eb783
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2072-0505
2587-9294
language Russian
last_indexed 2024-12-16T23:42:06Z
publishDate 2018-11-01
publisher MONIKI
record_format Article
series Alʹmanah Kliničeskoj Mediciny
spelling doaj.art-d4a749a6fd18416da479ab1f018eb7832022-12-21T22:11:35ZrusMONIKIAlʹmanah Kliničeskoj Mediciny2072-05052587-92942018-11-0146658459110.18786/2072-0505-2018-46-6-584-591572Short-term results after minimally invasive and open liver resection for liver metastases of colorectal cancer: a single center experienceM. G. Efanov0R. B. Alikhanov1V. V. Tsvirkun2I. V. Kazakov3P. P. Kim4А. N. Vankovich5K. D. Grendal6Е. N. Zamanov7The Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow Healthcare DepartmentThe Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow Healthcare DepartmentThe Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow Healthcare DepartmentThe Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow Healthcare DepartmentThe Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow Healthcare DepartmentThe Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow Healthcare DepartmentA.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and DentistryA.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and DentistryRationale: Until now, safety of minimally invasive liver resection (MILR) has not been studied sufficiently.Aim: To assess immediate results of MILR and open type resections in patients with colorectal metastases, performed in the Russian center of surgical hepatology specialized at implementation of minimally invasive techniques.Materials and мethods: This was a retrospective observational case-control study. Patients who underwent surgery for isolated liver metastases of colorectal cancer in a  single center from October 2013 to February 2018 were included into the study.Results: As per December 2017, over 500 resections have been performed in the study center, including 226 MILR. One hundred two patients underwent open resection and MILR for colorectal metastases. From 83 patients enrolled into the study, 51 (61%) had MILR, including 7 robotic MILR. The open resection and MILR groups did not differ in terms of gender, age, ASA score, primary tumors location and stage by the time of primary intervention. There were no between-group differences for factors that determine the tumor spread and influence the resection problems, i.e. the difficulty index of MILR, rate of anatomic resection, resection of complex segments, vascular involvement, size and number of metastases, multiple liver lesions and bilobar metastases. No difference was found for immediate outcomes in terms of frequency of the free surgical margin > 2 mm, rate of the Pringle maneuver implementation, duration of the procedure, blood components transfusion, severe complications (Clavien-Dindo Grade > II), and time in intensive care unit. Compared to open procedures, MILR were associated with significantly less blood loss: 583 (50–3000) mL vs. 308 (0–3300) mL (p = 0.012), respectively, and shorter duration of hospital stay: 10 (4–29) days vs. 9 (4–29) days (р < 0.001), respectively.Conclusion: In a specialized surgical hepatology center, MILR can be performed equally to complex open procedures without changes in the rates and types of complications, but with an improvement of immediate outcomes.https://www.almclinmed.ru/jour/article/view/897minimally invasive surgerylaparoscopic liver resectioncolorectal metastases
spellingShingle M. G. Efanov
R. B. Alikhanov
V. V. Tsvirkun
I. V. Kazakov
P. P. Kim
А. N. Vankovich
K. D. Grendal
Е. N. Zamanov
Short-term results after minimally invasive and open liver resection for liver metastases of colorectal cancer: a single center experience
Alʹmanah Kliničeskoj Mediciny
minimally invasive surgery
laparoscopic liver resection
colorectal metastases
title Short-term results after minimally invasive and open liver resection for liver metastases of colorectal cancer: a single center experience
title_full Short-term results after minimally invasive and open liver resection for liver metastases of colorectal cancer: a single center experience
title_fullStr Short-term results after minimally invasive and open liver resection for liver metastases of colorectal cancer: a single center experience
title_full_unstemmed Short-term results after minimally invasive and open liver resection for liver metastases of colorectal cancer: a single center experience
title_short Short-term results after minimally invasive and open liver resection for liver metastases of colorectal cancer: a single center experience
title_sort short term results after minimally invasive and open liver resection for liver metastases of colorectal cancer a single center experience
topic minimally invasive surgery
laparoscopic liver resection
colorectal metastases
url https://www.almclinmed.ru/jour/article/view/897
work_keys_str_mv AT mgefanov shorttermresultsafterminimallyinvasiveandopenliverresectionforlivermetastasesofcolorectalcancerasinglecenterexperience
AT rbalikhanov shorttermresultsafterminimallyinvasiveandopenliverresectionforlivermetastasesofcolorectalcancerasinglecenterexperience
AT vvtsvirkun shorttermresultsafterminimallyinvasiveandopenliverresectionforlivermetastasesofcolorectalcancerasinglecenterexperience
AT ivkazakov shorttermresultsafterminimallyinvasiveandopenliverresectionforlivermetastasesofcolorectalcancerasinglecenterexperience
AT ppkim shorttermresultsafterminimallyinvasiveandopenliverresectionforlivermetastasesofcolorectalcancerasinglecenterexperience
AT anvankovich shorttermresultsafterminimallyinvasiveandopenliverresectionforlivermetastasesofcolorectalcancerasinglecenterexperience
AT kdgrendal shorttermresultsafterminimallyinvasiveandopenliverresectionforlivermetastasesofcolorectalcancerasinglecenterexperience
AT enzamanov shorttermresultsafterminimallyinvasiveandopenliverresectionforlivermetastasesofcolorectalcancerasinglecenterexperience