Dispute Resolution after Brexit
<p>When setting out her priorities for the Brexit negotiations in a speech at Lancaster House in January, Theresa May promised to ‘bring an end to the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice in Britain.’ This forcefully formulated ‘red line’ turned into a headache for the British negoti...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | deu |
| Published: |
Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbH
|
| Series: | Verfassungsblog |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://verfassungsblog.de/dispute-resolution-after-brexit/ |
| _version_ | 1818189137941889024 |
|---|---|
| author | Tobias Lock |
| author_facet | Tobias Lock |
| author_sort | Tobias Lock |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <p>When setting out her priorities for the Brexit negotiations in a speech at Lancaster House in January, Theresa May promised to ‘bring an end to the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice in Britain.’ This forcefully formulated ‘red line’ turned into a headache for the British negotiators as it was both somewhat misconceived – the ECJ’s preliminary reference procedure hardly results in jurisdiction ‘in Britain’ – and overly categorical ignoring both the likely content of the UK-EU withdrawal agreement and the shape of the future UK-EU relationship envisaged by her own government as a ‘new, deep and special partnership.’ Today’s paper on ‘enforcement and dispute resolution’ should therefore be welcomed as injecting a portion of realism and pragmatism in the debate over the ECJ.</p>
|
| first_indexed | 2024-12-11T23:38:03Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-d4a84f427beb43fcbd91a0322bf18085 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2366-7044 |
| language | deu |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-11T23:38:03Z |
| publisher | Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbH |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Verfassungsblog |
| spelling | doaj.art-d4a84f427beb43fcbd91a0322bf180852022-12-22T00:45:48ZdeuMax Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbHVerfassungsblog2366-70442366-7044Dispute Resolution after BrexitTobias Lock<p>When setting out her priorities for the Brexit negotiations in a speech at Lancaster House in January, Theresa May promised to ‘bring an end to the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice in Britain.’ This forcefully formulated ‘red line’ turned into a headache for the British negotiators as it was both somewhat misconceived – the ECJ’s preliminary reference procedure hardly results in jurisdiction ‘in Britain’ – and overly categorical ignoring both the likely content of the UK-EU withdrawal agreement and the shape of the future UK-EU relationship envisaged by her own government as a ‘new, deep and special partnership.’ Today’s paper on ‘enforcement and dispute resolution’ should therefore be welcomed as injecting a portion of realism and pragmatism in the debate over the ECJ.</p> https://verfassungsblog.de/dispute-resolution-after-brexit/brexit, ECJ Jurisdiction, Theresa May |
| spellingShingle | Tobias Lock Dispute Resolution after Brexit Verfassungsblog brexit, ECJ Jurisdiction, Theresa May |
| title | Dispute Resolution after Brexit |
| title_full | Dispute Resolution after Brexit |
| title_fullStr | Dispute Resolution after Brexit |
| title_full_unstemmed | Dispute Resolution after Brexit |
| title_short | Dispute Resolution after Brexit |
| title_sort | dispute resolution after brexit |
| topic | brexit, ECJ Jurisdiction, Theresa May |
| url | https://verfassungsblog.de/dispute-resolution-after-brexit/ |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT tobiaslock disputeresolutionafterbrexit |