Validation and modification of HEART score components for patients with chest pain in the emergency department

Objective This study aimed to clarify the relative prognostic value of each History, Electrocardiography, Age, Risk Factors, and Troponin (HEART) score component for major adverse cardiac events (MACE) within 3 months and validate the modified HEART (mHEART) score. Methods This study evaluated the H...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Min Jae Kim, Sang Ook Ha, Young Sun Park, Jeong Hyeon Yi, Won Seok Yang, Jin Hyuck Kim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Korean Society of Emergency Medicine 2021-12-01
Series:Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ceemjournal.org/upload/pdf/ceem-20-106.pdf
_version_ 1797897185911635968
author Min Jae Kim
Sang Ook Ha
Young Sun Park
Jeong Hyeon Yi
Won Seok Yang
Jin Hyuck Kim
author_facet Min Jae Kim
Sang Ook Ha
Young Sun Park
Jeong Hyeon Yi
Won Seok Yang
Jin Hyuck Kim
author_sort Min Jae Kim
collection DOAJ
description Objective This study aimed to clarify the relative prognostic value of each History, Electrocardiography, Age, Risk Factors, and Troponin (HEART) score component for major adverse cardiac events (MACE) within 3 months and validate the modified HEART (mHEART) score. Methods This study evaluated the HEART score components for patients with chest symptoms visiting the emergency department from November 19, 2018 to November 19, 2019. All components were evaluated using logistic regression analysis and the scores for HEART, mHEART, and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) were determined using the receiver operating characteristics curve. Results The patients were divided into a derivation (809 patients) and a validation group (298 patients). In multivariate analysis, age did not show statistical significance in the detection of MACE within 3 months and the mHEART score was calculated after omitting the age component. The areas under the receiver operating characteristics curves for HEART, mHEART and TIMI scores in the prediction of MACE within 3 months were 0.88, 0.91, and 0.83, respectively, in the derivation group; and 0.88, 0.91, and 0.81, respectively, in the validation group. When the cutoff value for each scoring system was determined for the maintenance of a negative predictive value for a MACE rate >99%, the mHEART score showed the highest sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value (97.4%, 54.2%, 23.7%, and 99.3%, respectively). Conclusion Our study showed that the mHEART score better detects short-term MACE in high-risk patients and ensures the safe disposition of low-risk patients than the HEART and TIMI scores.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T07:53:33Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d4ac33a12f4a4011979921926b395ef3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2383-4625
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T07:53:33Z
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher The Korean Society of Emergency Medicine
record_format Article
series Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine
spelling doaj.art-d4ac33a12f4a4011979921926b395ef32023-02-23T07:07:10ZengThe Korean Society of Emergency MedicineClinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine2383-46252021-12-018427928810.15441/ceem.20.106362Validation and modification of HEART score components for patients with chest pain in the emergency departmentMin Jae Kim0Sang Ook Ha1Young Sun Park2Jeong Hyeon Yi3Won Seok Yang4Jin Hyuck Kim5 Department of Emergency Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University Medical Center, Anyang, Korea Department of Emergency Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University Medical Center, Anyang, Korea Department of Emergency Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University Medical Center, Anyang, Korea Department of Emergency Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University Medical Center, Anyang, Korea Department of Emergency Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University Medical Center, Anyang, Korea Department of Neurology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University Medical Center, Anyang, KoreaObjective This study aimed to clarify the relative prognostic value of each History, Electrocardiography, Age, Risk Factors, and Troponin (HEART) score component for major adverse cardiac events (MACE) within 3 months and validate the modified HEART (mHEART) score. Methods This study evaluated the HEART score components for patients with chest symptoms visiting the emergency department from November 19, 2018 to November 19, 2019. All components were evaluated using logistic regression analysis and the scores for HEART, mHEART, and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) were determined using the receiver operating characteristics curve. Results The patients were divided into a derivation (809 patients) and a validation group (298 patients). In multivariate analysis, age did not show statistical significance in the detection of MACE within 3 months and the mHEART score was calculated after omitting the age component. The areas under the receiver operating characteristics curves for HEART, mHEART and TIMI scores in the prediction of MACE within 3 months were 0.88, 0.91, and 0.83, respectively, in the derivation group; and 0.88, 0.91, and 0.81, respectively, in the validation group. When the cutoff value for each scoring system was determined for the maintenance of a negative predictive value for a MACE rate >99%, the mHEART score showed the highest sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value (97.4%, 54.2%, 23.7%, and 99.3%, respectively). Conclusion Our study showed that the mHEART score better detects short-term MACE in high-risk patients and ensures the safe disposition of low-risk patients than the HEART and TIMI scores.http://ceemjournal.org/upload/pdf/ceem-20-106.pdfchest painemergency service, hospitaladverse effectsprognosis
spellingShingle Min Jae Kim
Sang Ook Ha
Young Sun Park
Jeong Hyeon Yi
Won Seok Yang
Jin Hyuck Kim
Validation and modification of HEART score components for patients with chest pain in the emergency department
Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine
chest pain
emergency service, hospital
adverse effects
prognosis
title Validation and modification of HEART score components for patients with chest pain in the emergency department
title_full Validation and modification of HEART score components for patients with chest pain in the emergency department
title_fullStr Validation and modification of HEART score components for patients with chest pain in the emergency department
title_full_unstemmed Validation and modification of HEART score components for patients with chest pain in the emergency department
title_short Validation and modification of HEART score components for patients with chest pain in the emergency department
title_sort validation and modification of heart score components for patients with chest pain in the emergency department
topic chest pain
emergency service, hospital
adverse effects
prognosis
url http://ceemjournal.org/upload/pdf/ceem-20-106.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT minjaekim validationandmodificationofheartscorecomponentsforpatientswithchestpainintheemergencydepartment
AT sangookha validationandmodificationofheartscorecomponentsforpatientswithchestpainintheemergencydepartment
AT youngsunpark validationandmodificationofheartscorecomponentsforpatientswithchestpainintheemergencydepartment
AT jeonghyeonyi validationandmodificationofheartscorecomponentsforpatientswithchestpainintheemergencydepartment
AT wonseokyang validationandmodificationofheartscorecomponentsforpatientswithchestpainintheemergencydepartment
AT jinhyuckkim validationandmodificationofheartscorecomponentsforpatientswithchestpainintheemergencydepartment