An Episodic Model of Task Switching Effects: Erasing the Homunculus from Memory

The Parallel Episodic Processing (PEP) model is a neural network for simulating human performance<br />in speeded response time tasks. It learns with an exemplar-based memory store and it is capable of modelling findings from various subdomains of cognition. In this paper, we show how the PEP...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: James R. Schmidt, Baptist Liefooghe, Jan De Houwer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ubiquity Press 2020-09-01
Series:Journal of Cognition
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.journalofcognition.org/articles/97
_version_ 1818139822460502016
author James R. Schmidt
Baptist Liefooghe
Jan De Houwer
author_facet James R. Schmidt
Baptist Liefooghe
Jan De Houwer
author_sort James R. Schmidt
collection DOAJ
description The Parallel Episodic Processing (PEP) model is a neural network for simulating human performance<br />in speeded response time tasks. It learns with an exemplar-based memory store and it is capable of modelling findings from various subdomains of cognition. In this paper, we show how the PEP model can be designed to follow instructions (e.g., task rules and goals). The extended PEP model is then used to simulate a number of key findings from the task switching domain. These include the switch cost, task-rule congruency effects, response repetition asymmetries, cue repetition benefits, and the full pattern of means from a recent feature integration decomposition of cued task switching (Schmidt & Liefooghe, 2016). We demonstrate that the PEP model fits the participant data well, that the model does not possess the flexibility to match any pattern of results, and that a number of competing task switching models fail to account for key observations that the PEP model produces naturally. Given the parsimony and unique explanatory power of the episodic account presented here, our results suggest that feature-integration biases have a far greater power in explaining task-switching performance than previously assumed.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T10:34:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d4b0f0e2a4664b268c4b2e82e8bb2cad
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2514-4820
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T10:34:12Z
publishDate 2020-09-01
publisher Ubiquity Press
record_format Article
series Journal of Cognition
spelling doaj.art-d4b0f0e2a4664b268c4b2e82e8bb2cad2022-12-22T01:10:46ZengUbiquity PressJournal of Cognition2514-48202020-09-013110.5334/joc.97131An Episodic Model of Task Switching Effects: Erasing the Homunculus from MemoryJames R. Schmidt0Baptist Liefooghe1Jan De Houwer2LEAD-CNRS UMR 5022, Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté (UBFC), FR; Department of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent UniversityDepartment of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, BE; Department of Social, Health and Organizational Psychology, Utrecht UniversityDepartment of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent UniversityThe Parallel Episodic Processing (PEP) model is a neural network for simulating human performance<br />in speeded response time tasks. It learns with an exemplar-based memory store and it is capable of modelling findings from various subdomains of cognition. In this paper, we show how the PEP model can be designed to follow instructions (e.g., task rules and goals). The extended PEP model is then used to simulate a number of key findings from the task switching domain. These include the switch cost, task-rule congruency effects, response repetition asymmetries, cue repetition benefits, and the full pattern of means from a recent feature integration decomposition of cued task switching (Schmidt & Liefooghe, 2016). We demonstrate that the PEP model fits the participant data well, that the model does not possess the flexibility to match any pattern of results, and that a number of competing task switching models fail to account for key observations that the PEP model produces naturally. Given the parsimony and unique explanatory power of the episodic account presented here, our results suggest that feature-integration biases have a far greater power in explaining task-switching performance than previously assumed.https://www.journalofcognition.org/articles/97computational modellingneural networksepisodic memorybindingswitch costsfeature integrationtask-rule congruencyinstruction implementationgoals
spellingShingle James R. Schmidt
Baptist Liefooghe
Jan De Houwer
An Episodic Model of Task Switching Effects: Erasing the Homunculus from Memory
Journal of Cognition
computational modelling
neural networks
episodic memory
binding
switch costs
feature integration
task-rule congruency
instruction implementation
goals
title An Episodic Model of Task Switching Effects: Erasing the Homunculus from Memory
title_full An Episodic Model of Task Switching Effects: Erasing the Homunculus from Memory
title_fullStr An Episodic Model of Task Switching Effects: Erasing the Homunculus from Memory
title_full_unstemmed An Episodic Model of Task Switching Effects: Erasing the Homunculus from Memory
title_short An Episodic Model of Task Switching Effects: Erasing the Homunculus from Memory
title_sort episodic model of task switching effects erasing the homunculus from memory
topic computational modelling
neural networks
episodic memory
binding
switch costs
feature integration
task-rule congruency
instruction implementation
goals
url https://www.journalofcognition.org/articles/97
work_keys_str_mv AT jamesrschmidt anepisodicmodeloftaskswitchingeffectserasingthehomunculusfrommemory
AT baptistliefooghe anepisodicmodeloftaskswitchingeffectserasingthehomunculusfrommemory
AT jandehouwer anepisodicmodeloftaskswitchingeffectserasingthehomunculusfrommemory
AT jamesrschmidt episodicmodeloftaskswitchingeffectserasingthehomunculusfrommemory
AT baptistliefooghe episodicmodeloftaskswitchingeffectserasingthehomunculusfrommemory
AT jandehouwer episodicmodeloftaskswitchingeffectserasingthehomunculusfrommemory