Regeneration or Scarring Derive from Specific Evolutionary Environmental Adaptations of the Life Cycles in Different Animals

The ability to heal or even regenerate large injuries in different animals derives from the evolution of their specific life cycles during geological times. The present, new hypothesis tries to explain the distribution of organ regeneration among animals. Only invertebrates and vertebrates that incl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lorenzo Alibardi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-05-01
Series:Biology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2079-7737/12/5/733
_version_ 1797601058587934720
author Lorenzo Alibardi
author_facet Lorenzo Alibardi
author_sort Lorenzo Alibardi
collection DOAJ
description The ability to heal or even regenerate large injuries in different animals derives from the evolution of their specific life cycles during geological times. The present, new hypothesis tries to explain the distribution of organ regeneration among animals. Only invertebrates and vertebrates that include larval and intense metamorphic transformations can broadly regenerate as adults. Basically, regeneration competent animals are aquatic while terrestrial species have largely or completely lost most of the regeneration ability. Although genomes of terrestrial species still contain numerous genes that in aquatic species allow a broad regeneration (“regenerative genes”), the evolution of terrestrial species has variably modified the genetic networks linking these genes to the others that evolved during land adaptation, resulting in the inhibition of regeneration. Loss of regeneration took place by the elimination of intermediate larval phases and metamorphic transformations in the life cycles of land invertebrates and vertebrates. Once the evolution along a specific lineage generated species that could no longer regenerate, this outcome could not change anymore. It is therefore likely that what we learn from regenerative species will explain their mechanisms of regeneration but cannot or only partly be applied to non-regenerative species. Attempts to introduce “regenerative genes” in non-regenerative species most likely would disorder the entire genetic networks of the latter, determining death, teratomas and cancer. This awareness indicates the difficulty to introduce regenerative genes and their activation pathways in species that evolved genetic networks suppressing organ regeneration. Organ regeneration in non-regenerating animals such as humans should move to bio-engineering interventions in addition to “localized regenerative gene therapies” in order to replace lost tissues or organs.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T03:56:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d4b25452c08a4cb5ac737a6bef773d7d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2079-7737
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T03:56:08Z
publishDate 2023-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Biology
spelling doaj.art-d4b25452c08a4cb5ac737a6bef773d7d2023-11-18T00:33:38ZengMDPI AGBiology2079-77372023-05-0112573310.3390/biology12050733Regeneration or Scarring Derive from Specific Evolutionary Environmental Adaptations of the Life Cycles in Different AnimalsLorenzo Alibardi0Comparative Histolab Padova and Department of Biology, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, ItalyThe ability to heal or even regenerate large injuries in different animals derives from the evolution of their specific life cycles during geological times. The present, new hypothesis tries to explain the distribution of organ regeneration among animals. Only invertebrates and vertebrates that include larval and intense metamorphic transformations can broadly regenerate as adults. Basically, regeneration competent animals are aquatic while terrestrial species have largely or completely lost most of the regeneration ability. Although genomes of terrestrial species still contain numerous genes that in aquatic species allow a broad regeneration (“regenerative genes”), the evolution of terrestrial species has variably modified the genetic networks linking these genes to the others that evolved during land adaptation, resulting in the inhibition of regeneration. Loss of regeneration took place by the elimination of intermediate larval phases and metamorphic transformations in the life cycles of land invertebrates and vertebrates. Once the evolution along a specific lineage generated species that could no longer regenerate, this outcome could not change anymore. It is therefore likely that what we learn from regenerative species will explain their mechanisms of regeneration but cannot or only partly be applied to non-regenerative species. Attempts to introduce “regenerative genes” in non-regenerative species most likely would disorder the entire genetic networks of the latter, determining death, teratomas and cancer. This awareness indicates the difficulty to introduce regenerative genes and their activation pathways in species that evolved genetic networks suppressing organ regeneration. Organ regeneration in non-regenerating animals such as humans should move to bio-engineering interventions in addition to “localized regenerative gene therapies” in order to replace lost tissues or organs.https://www.mdpi.com/2079-7737/12/5/733animal regenerationevolutionmetamorphosisgenesregenerative medicine
spellingShingle Lorenzo Alibardi
Regeneration or Scarring Derive from Specific Evolutionary Environmental Adaptations of the Life Cycles in Different Animals
Biology
animal regeneration
evolution
metamorphosis
genes
regenerative medicine
title Regeneration or Scarring Derive from Specific Evolutionary Environmental Adaptations of the Life Cycles in Different Animals
title_full Regeneration or Scarring Derive from Specific Evolutionary Environmental Adaptations of the Life Cycles in Different Animals
title_fullStr Regeneration or Scarring Derive from Specific Evolutionary Environmental Adaptations of the Life Cycles in Different Animals
title_full_unstemmed Regeneration or Scarring Derive from Specific Evolutionary Environmental Adaptations of the Life Cycles in Different Animals
title_short Regeneration or Scarring Derive from Specific Evolutionary Environmental Adaptations of the Life Cycles in Different Animals
title_sort regeneration or scarring derive from specific evolutionary environmental adaptations of the life cycles in different animals
topic animal regeneration
evolution
metamorphosis
genes
regenerative medicine
url https://www.mdpi.com/2079-7737/12/5/733
work_keys_str_mv AT lorenzoalibardi regenerationorscarringderivefromspecificevolutionaryenvironmentaladaptationsofthelifecyclesindifferentanimals