Comparing the Provisions of Principe de Contradictoire under Iranian and English Law

Guaranteeing the equality of the parties before the court is one of the most important characteristics of a fair judicial proceeding. In this regard, it should be said that each party has the right to be informed of the other party's evidences and claims, challenge those claims and state his ow...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sam Mohammadi, mehran alamdari
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Allameh Tabataba'i University Press 2016-08-01
Series:Faṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i Khuṣūṣī
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jplr.atu.ac.ir/article_4460_6df904350423c9b55fa6602921efc4ec.pdf
_version_ 1797375895016570880
author Sam Mohammadi
mehran alamdari
author_facet Sam Mohammadi
mehran alamdari
author_sort Sam Mohammadi
collection DOAJ
description Guaranteeing the equality of the parties before the court is one of the most important characteristics of a fair judicial proceeding. In this regard, it should be said that each party has the right to be informed of the other party's evidences and claims, challenge those claims and state his own evidences and claims. This right is recognized in both the Iranian and English legal systems, although there is no express statement of it in legal documents. By comparing the provisions of the two systems, this article tries to seek out and extract Principe du contradictoire in both systems. We will see that although Principe du contradictoire is originally a French principle, it is so closely connected with mandatory rules and internationally accepted principles that it is impossible to deny its existence in Iranian and English legal systems. It is certain that comprehending the nature and role of Principe du contradictoire in English legal system helps us find new aspects and discover unknown angles of this principle in our own legal system.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T19:30:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d4b26b4340054e188ba45297664cc73b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2345-3583
2476-6232
language fas
last_indexed 2024-03-08T19:30:51Z
publishDate 2016-08-01
publisher Allameh Tabataba'i University Press
record_format Article
series Faṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i Khuṣūṣī
spelling doaj.art-d4b26b4340054e188ba45297664cc73b2023-12-26T07:47:36ZfasAllameh Tabataba'i University PressFaṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i Khuṣūṣī2345-35832476-62322016-08-0141510912710.22054/jplr.2016.44604460Comparing the Provisions of Principe de Contradictoire under Iranian and English LawSam Mohammadi0mehran alamdari1University Of Mazandaranدانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد حقوق خصوصی دانشگاه مازندرانGuaranteeing the equality of the parties before the court is one of the most important characteristics of a fair judicial proceeding. In this regard, it should be said that each party has the right to be informed of the other party's evidences and claims, challenge those claims and state his own evidences and claims. This right is recognized in both the Iranian and English legal systems, although there is no express statement of it in legal documents. By comparing the provisions of the two systems, this article tries to seek out and extract Principe du contradictoire in both systems. We will see that although Principe du contradictoire is originally a French principle, it is so closely connected with mandatory rules and internationally accepted principles that it is impossible to deny its existence in Iranian and English legal systems. It is certain that comprehending the nature and role of Principe du contradictoire in English legal system helps us find new aspects and discover unknown angles of this principle in our own legal system.https://jplr.atu.ac.ir/article_4460_6df904350423c9b55fa6602921efc4ec.pdfprincipe de contradictoireequality of the partiesthe right to be heardmandatory rulescomparative study
spellingShingle Sam Mohammadi
mehran alamdari
Comparing the Provisions of Principe de Contradictoire under Iranian and English Law
Faṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i Khuṣūṣī
principe de contradictoire
equality of the parties
the right to be heard
mandatory rules
comparative study
title Comparing the Provisions of Principe de Contradictoire under Iranian and English Law
title_full Comparing the Provisions of Principe de Contradictoire under Iranian and English Law
title_fullStr Comparing the Provisions of Principe de Contradictoire under Iranian and English Law
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the Provisions of Principe de Contradictoire under Iranian and English Law
title_short Comparing the Provisions of Principe de Contradictoire under Iranian and English Law
title_sort comparing the provisions of principe de contradictoire under iranian and english law
topic principe de contradictoire
equality of the parties
the right to be heard
mandatory rules
comparative study
url https://jplr.atu.ac.ir/article_4460_6df904350423c9b55fa6602921efc4ec.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT sammohammadi comparingtheprovisionsofprincipedecontradictoireunderiranianandenglishlaw
AT mehranalamdari comparingtheprovisionsofprincipedecontradictoireunderiranianandenglishlaw