Exploring participatory communication implemented to improve the livelihood of rural Ethiopia

Abstract The study aimed to explore how participatory communication can be used as an instrument for interventions enhancing agricultural production to improve the livelihoods of rural people. Specifically, it was designed to explore the nature of participatory approaches in the Ethiopian agricultur...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hailemesekel Zewedie Gebeyehu, Yohannes Shiferaw Jira
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer Nature 2023-11-01
Series:Humanities & Social Sciences Communications
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02286-6
_version_ 1797630408461910016
author Hailemesekel Zewedie Gebeyehu
Yohannes Shiferaw Jira
author_facet Hailemesekel Zewedie Gebeyehu
Yohannes Shiferaw Jira
author_sort Hailemesekel Zewedie Gebeyehu
collection DOAJ
description Abstract The study aimed to explore how participatory communication can be used as an instrument for interventions enhancing agricultural production to improve the livelihoods of rural people. Specifically, it was designed to explore the nature of participatory approaches in the Ethiopian agricultural sector. The top-down approach that prevailed in the past lost its faith, and consequently, stakeholders practiced a participatory communication approach. Thus, explorative qualitative research was applied through focus group discussions and in-depth interviews to collect data. Data were transcribed, documented, coded, and thematically analyzed based on recurring themes. The findings show that if properly implemented, development agents and agricultural experts believe that participatory communication is instrumental in mobilizing the community. However, the routine does not allow development agents and experts to use the participatory approach. Besides, farmers are not given sufficient time due to insufficient interaction and communication on agricultural issues. Farmers and development agents have no ongoing, programmed, and frequent contact. The communication between development agents and higher-level agricultural experts is mainly top-down. Provincial and regional experts do not regularly visit and observe farm sites; they depend on the monthly paper report to execute modifications to the annual plan. There is no practical obligation with the consensus that demands farmers, development agents, and experts accomplish their tasks and duties on time with maximum effort. No dialogical session is available for the community to discuss their matters. Therefore, we suggest stakeholders use a multilevel and inclusive intervention in rural agriculture.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T11:06:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d4c2769846224351a728909b28f09838
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2662-9992
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T11:06:56Z
publishDate 2023-11-01
publisher Springer Nature
record_format Article
series Humanities & Social Sciences Communications
spelling doaj.art-d4c2769846224351a728909b28f098382023-11-12T12:10:23ZengSpringer NatureHumanities & Social Sciences Communications2662-99922023-11-011011910.1057/s41599-023-02286-6Exploring participatory communication implemented to improve the livelihood of rural EthiopiaHailemesekel Zewedie Gebeyehu0Yohannes Shiferaw Jira1Hawassa University, Department of Journalism and Communication, Hawassa UniversityAddis Ababa University, School of Journalism and Communication, Addis Ababa UniversityAbstract The study aimed to explore how participatory communication can be used as an instrument for interventions enhancing agricultural production to improve the livelihoods of rural people. Specifically, it was designed to explore the nature of participatory approaches in the Ethiopian agricultural sector. The top-down approach that prevailed in the past lost its faith, and consequently, stakeholders practiced a participatory communication approach. Thus, explorative qualitative research was applied through focus group discussions and in-depth interviews to collect data. Data were transcribed, documented, coded, and thematically analyzed based on recurring themes. The findings show that if properly implemented, development agents and agricultural experts believe that participatory communication is instrumental in mobilizing the community. However, the routine does not allow development agents and experts to use the participatory approach. Besides, farmers are not given sufficient time due to insufficient interaction and communication on agricultural issues. Farmers and development agents have no ongoing, programmed, and frequent contact. The communication between development agents and higher-level agricultural experts is mainly top-down. Provincial and regional experts do not regularly visit and observe farm sites; they depend on the monthly paper report to execute modifications to the annual plan. There is no practical obligation with the consensus that demands farmers, development agents, and experts accomplish their tasks and duties on time with maximum effort. No dialogical session is available for the community to discuss their matters. Therefore, we suggest stakeholders use a multilevel and inclusive intervention in rural agriculture.https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02286-6
spellingShingle Hailemesekel Zewedie Gebeyehu
Yohannes Shiferaw Jira
Exploring participatory communication implemented to improve the livelihood of rural Ethiopia
Humanities & Social Sciences Communications
title Exploring participatory communication implemented to improve the livelihood of rural Ethiopia
title_full Exploring participatory communication implemented to improve the livelihood of rural Ethiopia
title_fullStr Exploring participatory communication implemented to improve the livelihood of rural Ethiopia
title_full_unstemmed Exploring participatory communication implemented to improve the livelihood of rural Ethiopia
title_short Exploring participatory communication implemented to improve the livelihood of rural Ethiopia
title_sort exploring participatory communication implemented to improve the livelihood of rural ethiopia
url https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02286-6
work_keys_str_mv AT hailemesekelzewediegebeyehu exploringparticipatorycommunicationimplementedtoimprovethelivelihoodofruralethiopia
AT yohannesshiferawjira exploringparticipatorycommunicationimplementedtoimprovethelivelihoodofruralethiopia