Efficacy of confrontational counselling for smoking cessation in smokers with previously undiagnosed mild to moderate airflow limitation: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The use of spirometry for early detection of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is still an issue of debate, particularly because of a lack of convincing evidence that spirometry has an added positive effect on smoking cess...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Huibers Marcus JH, Wesseling Geertjan, Kotz Daniel, van Schayck Onno CP
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2007-11-01
Series:BMC Public Health
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/7/332
_version_ 1818344459769741312
author Huibers Marcus JH
Wesseling Geertjan
Kotz Daniel
van Schayck Onno CP
author_facet Huibers Marcus JH
Wesseling Geertjan
Kotz Daniel
van Schayck Onno CP
author_sort Huibers Marcus JH
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The use of spirometry for early detection of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is still an issue of debate, particularly because of a lack of convincing evidence that spirometry has an added positive effect on smoking cessation. We hypothesise that early detection of COPD and confrontation with spirometry for smoking cessation may be effective when applying an approach we have termed "confrontational counselling"; a patient-centred approach which involves specific communication skills and elements of cognitive therapy. An important aspect is to confront the smoker with his/her airflow limitation during the counselling sessions. The primary objective of this study is to test the efficacy of confrontational counselling in comparison to regular health education and promotion for smoking cessation delivered by specialized respiratory nurses in current smokers with previously undiagnosed mild to moderate airflow limitation.</p> <p>Methods/Design</p> <p>The study design is a randomized controlled trial comparing confrontational counselling delivered by a respiratory nurse combined with nortriptyline for smoking cessation (experimental group), health education and promotion delivered by a respiratory nurse combined with nortriptyline for smoking cessation (control group 1), and "care as usual" delivered by the GP (control group 2). Early detection of smokers with mild to moderate airflow limitation is achieved by means of a telephone interview in combination with spirometry. Due to a comparable baseline risk of airflow limitation and motivation to quit smoking, and because of the standardization of number, duration, and scheduling of counselling sessions between the experimental group and control group 1, the study enables to assess the "net" effect of confrontational counselling. The study has been ethically approved and registered.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>Ethical as well as methodological considerations of the study are discussed in this protocol. A significant and relevant effect of confrontational counselling would provide an argument in favour of early detection of current smokers with airflow limitation. Successful treatment of tobacco dependence in respiratory patients requires repeated intensive interventions. The results of this study may also show that respiratory nurses are able to deliver this treatment and that intensive smoking cessation counselling is more feasible.</p> <p>Trial registration:</p> <p>Netherlands Trial Register (ISRCTN 64481813).</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-13T16:46:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d4c90c7a670c4d2286b34abbef52d50d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2458
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T16:46:49Z
publishDate 2007-11-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Public Health
spelling doaj.art-d4c90c7a670c4d2286b34abbef52d50d2022-12-21T23:38:09ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582007-11-017133210.1186/1471-2458-7-332Efficacy of confrontational counselling for smoking cessation in smokers with previously undiagnosed mild to moderate airflow limitation: study protocol of a randomized controlled trialHuibers Marcus JHWesseling GeertjanKotz Danielvan Schayck Onno CP<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The use of spirometry for early detection of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is still an issue of debate, particularly because of a lack of convincing evidence that spirometry has an added positive effect on smoking cessation. We hypothesise that early detection of COPD and confrontation with spirometry for smoking cessation may be effective when applying an approach we have termed "confrontational counselling"; a patient-centred approach which involves specific communication skills and elements of cognitive therapy. An important aspect is to confront the smoker with his/her airflow limitation during the counselling sessions. The primary objective of this study is to test the efficacy of confrontational counselling in comparison to regular health education and promotion for smoking cessation delivered by specialized respiratory nurses in current smokers with previously undiagnosed mild to moderate airflow limitation.</p> <p>Methods/Design</p> <p>The study design is a randomized controlled trial comparing confrontational counselling delivered by a respiratory nurse combined with nortriptyline for smoking cessation (experimental group), health education and promotion delivered by a respiratory nurse combined with nortriptyline for smoking cessation (control group 1), and "care as usual" delivered by the GP (control group 2). Early detection of smokers with mild to moderate airflow limitation is achieved by means of a telephone interview in combination with spirometry. Due to a comparable baseline risk of airflow limitation and motivation to quit smoking, and because of the standardization of number, duration, and scheduling of counselling sessions between the experimental group and control group 1, the study enables to assess the "net" effect of confrontational counselling. The study has been ethically approved and registered.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>Ethical as well as methodological considerations of the study are discussed in this protocol. A significant and relevant effect of confrontational counselling would provide an argument in favour of early detection of current smokers with airflow limitation. Successful treatment of tobacco dependence in respiratory patients requires repeated intensive interventions. The results of this study may also show that respiratory nurses are able to deliver this treatment and that intensive smoking cessation counselling is more feasible.</p> <p>Trial registration:</p> <p>Netherlands Trial Register (ISRCTN 64481813).</p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/7/332
spellingShingle Huibers Marcus JH
Wesseling Geertjan
Kotz Daniel
van Schayck Onno CP
Efficacy of confrontational counselling for smoking cessation in smokers with previously undiagnosed mild to moderate airflow limitation: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial
BMC Public Health
title Efficacy of confrontational counselling for smoking cessation in smokers with previously undiagnosed mild to moderate airflow limitation: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial
title_full Efficacy of confrontational counselling for smoking cessation in smokers with previously undiagnosed mild to moderate airflow limitation: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Efficacy of confrontational counselling for smoking cessation in smokers with previously undiagnosed mild to moderate airflow limitation: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of confrontational counselling for smoking cessation in smokers with previously undiagnosed mild to moderate airflow limitation: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial
title_short Efficacy of confrontational counselling for smoking cessation in smokers with previously undiagnosed mild to moderate airflow limitation: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial
title_sort efficacy of confrontational counselling for smoking cessation in smokers with previously undiagnosed mild to moderate airflow limitation study protocol of a randomized controlled trial
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/7/332
work_keys_str_mv AT huibersmarcusjh efficacyofconfrontationalcounsellingforsmokingcessationinsmokerswithpreviouslyundiagnosedmildtomoderateairflowlimitationstudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wesselinggeertjan efficacyofconfrontationalcounsellingforsmokingcessationinsmokerswithpreviouslyundiagnosedmildtomoderateairflowlimitationstudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kotzdaniel efficacyofconfrontationalcounsellingforsmokingcessationinsmokerswithpreviouslyundiagnosedmildtomoderateairflowlimitationstudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vanschayckonnocp efficacyofconfrontationalcounsellingforsmokingcessationinsmokerswithpreviouslyundiagnosedmildtomoderateairflowlimitationstudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial