Plurality of Logical Systems? Comparing the Classic and Modern Logicians’ Views
Before emerging of the modern logic, the then current logical system seemed to be without any alternative. But now classical logic encounters several systems which claim to be logical systems and rival of classical logic. Therefore a philosophical question arises: Is pluralism in logical system and/...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | fas |
Published: |
Allameh Tabataba'i University Press
2008-12-01
|
Series: | حکمت و فلسفه |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://wph.atu.ac.ir/article_5763_c74c98d2d2b8f099dfba25ece29cbd85.pdf |
_version_ | 1827580903501594624 |
---|---|
author | fereshteh nabati |
author_facet | fereshteh nabati |
author_sort | fereshteh nabati |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Before emerging of the modern logic, the then current logical system seemed to be without any alternative. But now classical logic encounters several systems which claim to be logical systems and rival of classical logic. Therefore a philosophical question arises: Is pluralism in logical system and/or logical rules possible? Contemporary philosophers give various answers to this question. Many don’t accept this possibility but their reasons are different. Past philosophers and logicians didn’t answer explicitly to this question, but by using their work we can gather that if they had been asked about this question they would have given decisive negative answer to it. In this paper I try to show that they were realist about logic and consider logical truths and rules as "secondary intelligible" (in a broader sense of this term). |
first_indexed | 2024-03-08T22:26:46Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-d4d131e8f8594e9484bc0c8e6861e2aa |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1735-3238 2476-6038 |
language | fas |
last_indexed | 2024-03-08T22:26:46Z |
publishDate | 2008-12-01 |
publisher | Allameh Tabataba'i University Press |
record_format | Article |
series | حکمت و فلسفه |
spelling | doaj.art-d4d131e8f8594e9484bc0c8e6861e2aa2023-12-18T10:36:42ZfasAllameh Tabataba'i University Pressحکمت و فلسفه1735-32382476-60382008-12-0141610111310.22054/wph.2009.57635763Plurality of Logical Systems? Comparing the Classic and Modern Logicians’ Viewsfereshteh nabati0هیئت علمی دانشگاه علامه طباطباییBefore emerging of the modern logic, the then current logical system seemed to be without any alternative. But now classical logic encounters several systems which claim to be logical systems and rival of classical logic. Therefore a philosophical question arises: Is pluralism in logical system and/or logical rules possible? Contemporary philosophers give various answers to this question. Many don’t accept this possibility but their reasons are different. Past philosophers and logicians didn’t answer explicitly to this question, but by using their work we can gather that if they had been asked about this question they would have given decisive negative answer to it. In this paper I try to show that they were realist about logic and consider logical truths and rules as "secondary intelligible" (in a broader sense of this term).https://wph.atu.ac.ir/article_5763_c74c98d2d2b8f099dfba25ece29cbd85.pdflogical monismlogical realismlogical secondary intelligible |
spellingShingle | fereshteh nabati Plurality of Logical Systems? Comparing the Classic and Modern Logicians’ Views حکمت و فلسفه logical monism logical realism logical secondary intelligible |
title | Plurality of Logical Systems? Comparing the Classic and Modern Logicians’ Views |
title_full | Plurality of Logical Systems? Comparing the Classic and Modern Logicians’ Views |
title_fullStr | Plurality of Logical Systems? Comparing the Classic and Modern Logicians’ Views |
title_full_unstemmed | Plurality of Logical Systems? Comparing the Classic and Modern Logicians’ Views |
title_short | Plurality of Logical Systems? Comparing the Classic and Modern Logicians’ Views |
title_sort | plurality of logical systems comparing the classic and modern logicians views |
topic | logical monism logical realism logical secondary intelligible |
url | https://wph.atu.ac.ir/article_5763_c74c98d2d2b8f099dfba25ece29cbd85.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fereshtehnabati pluralityoflogicalsystemscomparingtheclassicandmodernlogiciansviews |