Plurality of Logical Systems? Comparing the Classic and Modern Logicians’ Views

Before emerging of the modern logic, the then current logical system seemed to be without any alternative. But now classical logic encounters several systems which claim to be logical systems and rival of classical logic. Therefore a philosophical question arises: Is pluralism in logical system and/...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: fereshteh nabati
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Allameh Tabataba'i University Press 2008-12-01
Series:حکمت و فلسفه
Subjects:
Online Access:https://wph.atu.ac.ir/article_5763_c74c98d2d2b8f099dfba25ece29cbd85.pdf
_version_ 1827580903501594624
author fereshteh nabati
author_facet fereshteh nabati
author_sort fereshteh nabati
collection DOAJ
description Before emerging of the modern logic, the then current logical system seemed to be without any alternative. But now classical logic encounters several systems which claim to be logical systems and rival of classical logic. Therefore a philosophical question arises: Is pluralism in logical system and/or logical rules possible? Contemporary philosophers give various answers to this question. Many don’t accept this possibility but their reasons are different. Past philosophers and logicians didn’t answer explicitly to this question, but by using their work we can gather that if they had been asked about this question they would have given decisive negative answer to it. In this paper I try to show that they were realist about logic and consider logical truths and rules as "secondary intelligible" (in a broader sense of this term).
first_indexed 2024-03-08T22:26:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d4d131e8f8594e9484bc0c8e6861e2aa
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1735-3238
2476-6038
language fas
last_indexed 2024-03-08T22:26:46Z
publishDate 2008-12-01
publisher Allameh Tabataba'i University Press
record_format Article
series حکمت و فلسفه
spelling doaj.art-d4d131e8f8594e9484bc0c8e6861e2aa2023-12-18T10:36:42ZfasAllameh Tabataba'i University Pressحکمت و فلسفه1735-32382476-60382008-12-0141610111310.22054/wph.2009.57635763Plurality of Logical Systems? Comparing the Classic and Modern Logicians’ Viewsfereshteh nabati0هیئت علمی دانشگاه علامه طباطباییBefore emerging of the modern logic, the then current logical system seemed to be without any alternative. But now classical logic encounters several systems which claim to be logical systems and rival of classical logic. Therefore a philosophical question arises: Is pluralism in logical system and/or logical rules possible? Contemporary philosophers give various answers to this question. Many don’t accept this possibility but their reasons are different. Past philosophers and logicians didn’t answer explicitly to this question, but by using their work we can gather that if they had been asked about this question they would have given decisive negative answer to it. In this paper I try to show that they were realist about logic and consider logical truths and rules as "secondary intelligible" (in a broader sense of this term).https://wph.atu.ac.ir/article_5763_c74c98d2d2b8f099dfba25ece29cbd85.pdflogical monismlogical realismlogical secondary intelligible
spellingShingle fereshteh nabati
Plurality of Logical Systems? Comparing the Classic and Modern Logicians’ Views
حکمت و فلسفه
logical monism
logical realism
logical secondary intelligible
title Plurality of Logical Systems? Comparing the Classic and Modern Logicians’ Views
title_full Plurality of Logical Systems? Comparing the Classic and Modern Logicians’ Views
title_fullStr Plurality of Logical Systems? Comparing the Classic and Modern Logicians’ Views
title_full_unstemmed Plurality of Logical Systems? Comparing the Classic and Modern Logicians’ Views
title_short Plurality of Logical Systems? Comparing the Classic and Modern Logicians’ Views
title_sort plurality of logical systems comparing the classic and modern logicians views
topic logical monism
logical realism
logical secondary intelligible
url https://wph.atu.ac.ir/article_5763_c74c98d2d2b8f099dfba25ece29cbd85.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT fereshtehnabati pluralityoflogicalsystemscomparingtheclassicandmodernlogiciansviews