Vérité judiciaire et stare decisis en droit privé québécois

Is judicial truth a uniform concept, with the same meaning, or at least, the same scope in common law and civil law ? It is suggested here that it is not. The expression seems to be more accurate in common law. Judicial truth, in this legal system, is intimately linked to the stare decisis doctrine...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sylvette Guillemard
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Association Clio et Themis 2020-11-01
Series:Clio@Themis
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/cliothemis/198
_version_ 1811298876752134144
author Sylvette Guillemard
author_facet Sylvette Guillemard
author_sort Sylvette Guillemard
collection DOAJ
description Is judicial truth a uniform concept, with the same meaning, or at least, the same scope in common law and civil law ? It is suggested here that it is not. The expression seems to be more accurate in common law. Judicial truth, in this legal system, is intimately linked to the stare decisis doctrine which lends it a more general and sustainable scope.What about the province of Quebec, where the civil procedure is hybrid ? Is it supposed to propagate judicial truth over time or not ? The answer is not unequivocal ; case law, including that of the Supreme Court of Canada, considers that the rule of precedent is present but watered down in the Quebec private law.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T06:26:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d4d17f732b104e65addb99acafb0e4ba
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2105-0929
language fra
last_indexed 2024-04-13T06:26:46Z
publishDate 2020-11-01
publisher Association Clio et Themis
record_format Article
series Clio@Themis
spelling doaj.art-d4d17f732b104e65addb99acafb0e4ba2022-12-22T02:58:22ZfraAssociation Clio et ThemisClio@Themis2105-09292020-11-0119Vérité judiciaire et stare decisis en droit privé québécoisSylvette GuillemardIs judicial truth a uniform concept, with the same meaning, or at least, the same scope in common law and civil law ? It is suggested here that it is not. The expression seems to be more accurate in common law. Judicial truth, in this legal system, is intimately linked to the stare decisis doctrine which lends it a more general and sustainable scope.What about the province of Quebec, where the civil procedure is hybrid ? Is it supposed to propagate judicial truth over time or not ? The answer is not unequivocal ; case law, including that of the Supreme Court of Canada, considers that the rule of precedent is present but watered down in the Quebec private law.http://journals.openedition.org/cliothemis/198civil lawcommon lawstare decisisQuebecjudicial truth
spellingShingle Sylvette Guillemard
Vérité judiciaire et stare decisis en droit privé québécois
Clio@Themis
civil law
common law
stare decisis
Quebec
judicial truth
title Vérité judiciaire et stare decisis en droit privé québécois
title_full Vérité judiciaire et stare decisis en droit privé québécois
title_fullStr Vérité judiciaire et stare decisis en droit privé québécois
title_full_unstemmed Vérité judiciaire et stare decisis en droit privé québécois
title_short Vérité judiciaire et stare decisis en droit privé québécois
title_sort verite judiciaire et stare decisis en droit prive quebecois
topic civil law
common law
stare decisis
Quebec
judicial truth
url http://journals.openedition.org/cliothemis/198
work_keys_str_mv AT sylvetteguillemard veritejudiciaireetstaredecisisendroitprivequebecois