Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation with different current density on upper limb motor disorder after stroke

Objective To explore the therapeutic effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) with different current density on upper limb motor disorder in stroke patients. Methods A total of 45 stroke patients with upper limb motor disorder hospitalized in Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical Universi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: ZHANG Da‑hua, SONG Wei‑qun, CHENG Yi‑nan, YUAN Ying, WANG Jie, MA Jia‑ni
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Tianjin Huanhu Hospital 2024-03-01
Series:Chinese Journal of Contemporary Neurology and Neurosurgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.cjcnn.org/index.php/cjcnn/article/view/2840
_version_ 1797232554197123072
author ZHANG Da‑hua
SONG Wei‑qun
CHENG Yi‑nan
YUAN Ying
WANG Jie
MA Jia‑ni
author_facet ZHANG Da‑hua
SONG Wei‑qun
CHENG Yi‑nan
YUAN Ying
WANG Jie
MA Jia‑ni
author_sort ZHANG Da‑hua
collection DOAJ
description Objective To explore the therapeutic effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) with different current density on upper limb motor disorder in stroke patients. Methods A total of 45 stroke patients with upper limb motor disorder hospitalized in Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University from March 2019 to June 2022 were selected and randomly divided into low current density stimulation group (low density group, 0.028 mA/cm2), medium current density stimulation group (medium density group, 0.057 mA/cm2), high current density stimulation group (high density group, 0.080 mA/cm2), 15 cases in each group. Upper limb motor function was evaluated by Fugl‑Meyer Assessment Scale for Upper Extremity (FMA‑UE) and Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) before and one week after treatment, and activity of daily living was evaluated by modified Barthel Index (mBI). Results After treatment of tDCS, FMA‑UE (F = 284.343, P = 0.000), ARAT (F = 180.427, P = 0.000) and mBI (F = 487.159, P = 0.000) scores in 3 groups were improved compared with those before treatment. FMA‑UE (F = 2.293, P = 0.000) and ARAT (F = 2.572, P = 0.000) scores were significantly different among 3 groups, FMA‑UE (t = 2.426, P = 0.029; t = 2.140, P = 0.035) and ARAT (t = 2.537, P = 0.024; t = 2.353, P = 0.028) scores in high density group and medium density group were higher than those in low density group. Conclusions tDCS is safe and effective in the treatment of upper limb motor disorder after stroke. Current densities of 0.057 and 0.080 mA/cm2 are more effective than those of 0.028 mA/cm2.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T16:02:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d4d40410210441648a8649d14a5c34f0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1672-6731
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T16:02:07Z
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher Tianjin Huanhu Hospital
record_format Article
series Chinese Journal of Contemporary Neurology and Neurosurgery
spelling doaj.art-d4d40410210441648a8649d14a5c34f02024-04-01T07:14:30ZengTianjin Huanhu HospitalChinese Journal of Contemporary Neurology and Neurosurgery1672-67312024-03-0124318819210.3969/j.issn.1672‑6731.2024.03.0132794Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation with different current density on upper limb motor disorder after strokeZHANG Da‑hua0SONG Wei‑qun1CHENG Yi‑nan2YUAN Ying3WANG Jie4MA Jia‑ni5Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, ChinaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, ChinaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, ChinaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, ChinaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, ChinaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, ChinaObjective To explore the therapeutic effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) with different current density on upper limb motor disorder in stroke patients. Methods A total of 45 stroke patients with upper limb motor disorder hospitalized in Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University from March 2019 to June 2022 were selected and randomly divided into low current density stimulation group (low density group, 0.028 mA/cm2), medium current density stimulation group (medium density group, 0.057 mA/cm2), high current density stimulation group (high density group, 0.080 mA/cm2), 15 cases in each group. Upper limb motor function was evaluated by Fugl‑Meyer Assessment Scale for Upper Extremity (FMA‑UE) and Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) before and one week after treatment, and activity of daily living was evaluated by modified Barthel Index (mBI). Results After treatment of tDCS, FMA‑UE (F = 284.343, P = 0.000), ARAT (F = 180.427, P = 0.000) and mBI (F = 487.159, P = 0.000) scores in 3 groups were improved compared with those before treatment. FMA‑UE (F = 2.293, P = 0.000) and ARAT (F = 2.572, P = 0.000) scores were significantly different among 3 groups, FMA‑UE (t = 2.426, P = 0.029; t = 2.140, P = 0.035) and ARAT (t = 2.537, P = 0.024; t = 2.353, P = 0.028) scores in high density group and medium density group were higher than those in low density group. Conclusions tDCS is safe and effective in the treatment of upper limb motor disorder after stroke. Current densities of 0.057 and 0.080 mA/cm2 are more effective than those of 0.028 mA/cm2.http://www.cjcnn.org/index.php/cjcnn/article/view/2840transcranial direct current stimulationstrokemotor disordersupper extremity
spellingShingle ZHANG Da‑hua
SONG Wei‑qun
CHENG Yi‑nan
YUAN Ying
WANG Jie
MA Jia‑ni
Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation with different current density on upper limb motor disorder after stroke
Chinese Journal of Contemporary Neurology and Neurosurgery
transcranial direct current stimulation
stroke
motor disorders
upper extremity
title Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation with different current density on upper limb motor disorder after stroke
title_full Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation with different current density on upper limb motor disorder after stroke
title_fullStr Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation with different current density on upper limb motor disorder after stroke
title_full_unstemmed Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation with different current density on upper limb motor disorder after stroke
title_short Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation with different current density on upper limb motor disorder after stroke
title_sort effect of transcranial direct current stimulation with different current density on upper limb motor disorder after stroke
topic transcranial direct current stimulation
stroke
motor disorders
upper extremity
url http://www.cjcnn.org/index.php/cjcnn/article/view/2840
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangdahua effectoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationwithdifferentcurrentdensityonupperlimbmotordisorderafterstroke
AT songweiqun effectoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationwithdifferentcurrentdensityonupperlimbmotordisorderafterstroke
AT chengyinan effectoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationwithdifferentcurrentdensityonupperlimbmotordisorderafterstroke
AT yuanying effectoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationwithdifferentcurrentdensityonupperlimbmotordisorderafterstroke
AT wangjie effectoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationwithdifferentcurrentdensityonupperlimbmotordisorderafterstroke
AT majiani effectoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationwithdifferentcurrentdensityonupperlimbmotordisorderafterstroke