Real Neurolaw in the Netherlands: The Role of the Developing Brain in the New Adolescent Criminal Law
Previous publications discussed the conditions under which courts admitted or could admit neurotechnological evidence like brain scans. There were also first attempts to investigate legal decisions neuroscientifically. The present paper analyzes a different way in which neuroscience already influenc...
Main Author: | Stephan Schleim |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020-07-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01762/full |
Similar Items
-
Structural injustice, marginality, and neurolaw: a normative comparative and theoretical approach
by: José Manuel Díaz-Soto, et al.
Published: (2024-09-01) -
Neuroprediction and A.I. in Forensic Psychiatry and Criminal Justice: A Neurolaw Perspective
by: Leda Tortora, et al.
Published: (2020-03-01) -
Usia Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Anak dalam Perspektif Neurolaw
by: M. Hendri Agustiawan, et al.
Published: (2023-09-01) -
Editorial: Neurolaw: The Call for Adjusting Theory Based on Scientific Results
by: José M. Muñoz, et al.
Published: (2020-10-01) -
Neurorights vs. neuroprediction and lie detection: The imperative limits to criminal law
by: José Manuel Díaz Soto, et al.
Published: (2022-12-01)