Comparison between modulations of contact and channel potential in nitrogen dioxide gas response of ambipolar carbon nanotube field-effect transistors

Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) are promising materials for gas sensing because of their large specific area and high sensitivity to charge differentiation. In CNT-based field-effect transistors (FETs) for gas sensing, both CNT potential modulation in the channels and Schottky barrier height modulation at t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shota Nakahara, Takahiro Morita, Haruka Omachi, Masafumi Inaba, Michihiko Nakano, Junya Suehiro
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AIP Publishing LLC 2022-12-01
Series:AIP Advances
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/5.0124891
_version_ 1828058395082489856
author Shota Nakahara
Takahiro Morita
Haruka Omachi
Masafumi Inaba
Michihiko Nakano
Junya Suehiro
author_facet Shota Nakahara
Takahiro Morita
Haruka Omachi
Masafumi Inaba
Michihiko Nakano
Junya Suehiro
author_sort Shota Nakahara
collection DOAJ
description Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) are promising materials for gas sensing because of their large specific area and high sensitivity to charge differentiation. In CNT-based field-effect transistors (FETs) for gas sensing, both CNT potential modulation in the channels and Schottky barrier height modulation at the CNT/metal electrode contact influence the current properties. However, researchers have not used Schottky barrier height modulation for gas detection. To investigate and compare the effects of Schottky barrier height modulation and CNT channel potential modulation on NO2 gas exposure, we fabricated ambipolar CNT FETs by the dielectrophoretic assembly. We exposed CNT FET gas sensors to N2 gas containing 100-ppb NO2 and observed two different responses in the electric properties: a steady current shift in the positive direction in the hole-conduction region because of the channel potential modulation, and an abrupt decrease in transconductance in the electron-conduction region because of the Schottky barrier modulation. The CNT channels and CNT/metal contact both contributed to the sensor response, and the modulation rate of the Schottky barrier was higher than that of the CNT potential shift in the channel.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T21:26:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d4d62171da8248b6a04d52a92d629a10
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2158-3226
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T21:26:32Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher AIP Publishing LLC
record_format Article
series AIP Advances
spelling doaj.art-d4d62171da8248b6a04d52a92d629a102023-01-19T16:47:10ZengAIP Publishing LLCAIP Advances2158-32262022-12-011212125302125302-610.1063/5.0124891Comparison between modulations of contact and channel potential in nitrogen dioxide gas response of ambipolar carbon nanotube field-effect transistorsShota Nakahara0Takahiro Morita1Haruka Omachi2Masafumi Inaba3Michihiko Nakano4Junya Suehiro5Graduate School of Information Science and Electrical Engineering, Kyushu University, 744 Motooka, Nishi-ku, Fukuoka 819-0395, JapanGraduate School of Information Science and Electrical Engineering, Kyushu University, 744 Motooka, Nishi-ku, Fukuoka 819-0395, JapanIntegrated Research Consortium on Chemical Sciences, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8602, JapanFaculty of Information Science and Electrical Engineering, Kyushu University, 744 Motooka, Nishi-ku, Fukuoka 819-0395, JapanFaculty of Information Science and Electrical Engineering, Kyushu University, 744 Motooka, Nishi-ku, Fukuoka 819-0395, JapanFaculty of Information Science and Electrical Engineering, Kyushu University, 744 Motooka, Nishi-ku, Fukuoka 819-0395, JapanCarbon nanotubes (CNTs) are promising materials for gas sensing because of their large specific area and high sensitivity to charge differentiation. In CNT-based field-effect transistors (FETs) for gas sensing, both CNT potential modulation in the channels and Schottky barrier height modulation at the CNT/metal electrode contact influence the current properties. However, researchers have not used Schottky barrier height modulation for gas detection. To investigate and compare the effects of Schottky barrier height modulation and CNT channel potential modulation on NO2 gas exposure, we fabricated ambipolar CNT FETs by the dielectrophoretic assembly. We exposed CNT FET gas sensors to N2 gas containing 100-ppb NO2 and observed two different responses in the electric properties: a steady current shift in the positive direction in the hole-conduction region because of the channel potential modulation, and an abrupt decrease in transconductance in the electron-conduction region because of the Schottky barrier modulation. The CNT channels and CNT/metal contact both contributed to the sensor response, and the modulation rate of the Schottky barrier was higher than that of the CNT potential shift in the channel.http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/5.0124891
spellingShingle Shota Nakahara
Takahiro Morita
Haruka Omachi
Masafumi Inaba
Michihiko Nakano
Junya Suehiro
Comparison between modulations of contact and channel potential in nitrogen dioxide gas response of ambipolar carbon nanotube field-effect transistors
AIP Advances
title Comparison between modulations of contact and channel potential in nitrogen dioxide gas response of ambipolar carbon nanotube field-effect transistors
title_full Comparison between modulations of contact and channel potential in nitrogen dioxide gas response of ambipolar carbon nanotube field-effect transistors
title_fullStr Comparison between modulations of contact and channel potential in nitrogen dioxide gas response of ambipolar carbon nanotube field-effect transistors
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between modulations of contact and channel potential in nitrogen dioxide gas response of ambipolar carbon nanotube field-effect transistors
title_short Comparison between modulations of contact and channel potential in nitrogen dioxide gas response of ambipolar carbon nanotube field-effect transistors
title_sort comparison between modulations of contact and channel potential in nitrogen dioxide gas response of ambipolar carbon nanotube field effect transistors
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/5.0124891
work_keys_str_mv AT shotanakahara comparisonbetweenmodulationsofcontactandchannelpotentialinnitrogendioxidegasresponseofambipolarcarbonnanotubefieldeffecttransistors
AT takahiromorita comparisonbetweenmodulationsofcontactandchannelpotentialinnitrogendioxidegasresponseofambipolarcarbonnanotubefieldeffecttransistors
AT harukaomachi comparisonbetweenmodulationsofcontactandchannelpotentialinnitrogendioxidegasresponseofambipolarcarbonnanotubefieldeffecttransistors
AT masafumiinaba comparisonbetweenmodulationsofcontactandchannelpotentialinnitrogendioxidegasresponseofambipolarcarbonnanotubefieldeffecttransistors
AT michihikonakano comparisonbetweenmodulationsofcontactandchannelpotentialinnitrogendioxidegasresponseofambipolarcarbonnanotubefieldeffecttransistors
AT junyasuehiro comparisonbetweenmodulationsofcontactandchannelpotentialinnitrogendioxidegasresponseofambipolarcarbonnanotubefieldeffecttransistors