Personalized Dose Selection for Treatment of Patients with Neuropsychiatric Disorders Using tDCS

<b>Background</b>: Individualizing transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) parameters can improve precision in neuropsychiatric disorders. One important decision for the clinician is the selection of an appropriate montage—conventional or high-definition (HD)—to implement dose-con...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sagarika Bhattacharjee, Rajan Kashyap, Vanteemar S. Sreeraj, Palanimuthu T. Sivakumar, Ganesan Venkatasubramanian, John E. Desmond, S. H. Annabel Chen, T. N. Sathyaprabha, Kaviraja Udupa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-11-01
Series:Brain Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/14/12/1162
_version_ 1826917875190857728
author Sagarika Bhattacharjee
Rajan Kashyap
Vanteemar S. Sreeraj
Palanimuthu T. Sivakumar
Ganesan Venkatasubramanian
John E. Desmond
S. H. Annabel Chen
T. N. Sathyaprabha
Kaviraja Udupa
author_facet Sagarika Bhattacharjee
Rajan Kashyap
Vanteemar S. Sreeraj
Palanimuthu T. Sivakumar
Ganesan Venkatasubramanian
John E. Desmond
S. H. Annabel Chen
T. N. Sathyaprabha
Kaviraja Udupa
author_sort Sagarika Bhattacharjee
collection DOAJ
description <b>Background</b>: Individualizing transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) parameters can improve precision in neuropsychiatric disorders. One important decision for the clinician is the selection of an appropriate montage—conventional or high-definition (HD)—to implement dose-controlled tDCS while maintaining the patient’s safety. <b>Method</b>: The present study simulated tDCS administration using T1-weighted brain images of 50 dementia, 25 depression patients, and 25 healthy individuals for two conventional and HD montages, targeting the regions of interest (ROIs) in the dorsal and ventral pathways that support language processing. For each tDCS configuration, the electric fields at the ROIs and the individualized dose required to achieve the desired current intensity at the target ROI across the subjects were estimated. Linear regression was performed on these parameters. <b>Result</b>: A significant relationship between atrophy and current dose that varies according to the disease was found. The dementia patients with significant brain atrophy required a higher personalized dosage for HD montage, as the current intensity at the target ROIs was lower and more variable than that of conventional montage. For dementia, tDCS individualization is pathway-dependent, wherein HD configuration of the dorsal route requires current dosages above the safety limit (>4 mA) for 46% of individuals. However, there was no significant difference in electrode configurations between the HD and traditional setups for depression and healthy volunteers without significant brain atrophy. <b>Conclusions</b>: HD-tDCS with fixed locations is limited, making conventional tDCS more effective for dose-controlled applications. In patients with atrophy, individualized adjustments based on simulations are needed due to the variable stimulation strength in the ROI.
first_indexed 2025-02-17T12:39:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d4da28989585419ea2ea66bc7e575250
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-3425
language English
last_indexed 2025-02-17T12:39:13Z
publishDate 2024-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Brain Sciences
spelling doaj.art-d4da28989585419ea2ea66bc7e5752502024-12-27T14:14:39ZengMDPI AGBrain Sciences2076-34252024-11-011412116210.3390/brainsci14121162Personalized Dose Selection for Treatment of Patients with Neuropsychiatric Disorders Using tDCSSagarika Bhattacharjee0Rajan Kashyap1Vanteemar S. Sreeraj2Palanimuthu T. Sivakumar3Ganesan Venkatasubramanian4John E. Desmond5S. H. Annabel Chen6T. N. Sathyaprabha7Kaviraja Udupa8Department of Neurophysiology, National Institute of Mental Health & Neurosciences NIMHANS, Bengaluru 560029, IndiaDepartment of Neuroimaging and Interventional Radiology, National Institute of Mental Health & Neurosciences NIMHANS, Bengaluru 560029, IndiaDepartment of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health & Neurosciences NIMHANS, Bengaluru 560029, IndiaDepartment of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health & Neurosciences NIMHANS, Bengaluru 560029, IndiaDepartment of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health & Neurosciences NIMHANS, Bengaluru 560029, IndiaDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21218, USADepartment of Psychology, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798, SingaporeDepartment of Neurophysiology, National Institute of Mental Health & Neurosciences NIMHANS, Bengaluru 560029, IndiaDepartment of Neurophysiology, National Institute of Mental Health & Neurosciences NIMHANS, Bengaluru 560029, India<b>Background</b>: Individualizing transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) parameters can improve precision in neuropsychiatric disorders. One important decision for the clinician is the selection of an appropriate montage—conventional or high-definition (HD)—to implement dose-controlled tDCS while maintaining the patient’s safety. <b>Method</b>: The present study simulated tDCS administration using T1-weighted brain images of 50 dementia, 25 depression patients, and 25 healthy individuals for two conventional and HD montages, targeting the regions of interest (ROIs) in the dorsal and ventral pathways that support language processing. For each tDCS configuration, the electric fields at the ROIs and the individualized dose required to achieve the desired current intensity at the target ROI across the subjects were estimated. Linear regression was performed on these parameters. <b>Result</b>: A significant relationship between atrophy and current dose that varies according to the disease was found. The dementia patients with significant brain atrophy required a higher personalized dosage for HD montage, as the current intensity at the target ROIs was lower and more variable than that of conventional montage. For dementia, tDCS individualization is pathway-dependent, wherein HD configuration of the dorsal route requires current dosages above the safety limit (>4 mA) for 46% of individuals. However, there was no significant difference in electrode configurations between the HD and traditional setups for depression and healthy volunteers without significant brain atrophy. <b>Conclusions</b>: HD-tDCS with fixed locations is limited, making conventional tDCS more effective for dose-controlled applications. In patients with atrophy, individualized adjustments based on simulations are needed due to the variable stimulation strength in the ROI.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/14/12/1162individualizationatrophyprecision medicinetranscranial direct current stimulationHD—conventional montage trade-off
spellingShingle Sagarika Bhattacharjee
Rajan Kashyap
Vanteemar S. Sreeraj
Palanimuthu T. Sivakumar
Ganesan Venkatasubramanian
John E. Desmond
S. H. Annabel Chen
T. N. Sathyaprabha
Kaviraja Udupa
Personalized Dose Selection for Treatment of Patients with Neuropsychiatric Disorders Using tDCS
Brain Sciences
individualization
atrophy
precision medicine
transcranial direct current stimulation
HD—conventional montage trade-off
title Personalized Dose Selection for Treatment of Patients with Neuropsychiatric Disorders Using tDCS
title_full Personalized Dose Selection for Treatment of Patients with Neuropsychiatric Disorders Using tDCS
title_fullStr Personalized Dose Selection for Treatment of Patients with Neuropsychiatric Disorders Using tDCS
title_full_unstemmed Personalized Dose Selection for Treatment of Patients with Neuropsychiatric Disorders Using tDCS
title_short Personalized Dose Selection for Treatment of Patients with Neuropsychiatric Disorders Using tDCS
title_sort personalized dose selection for treatment of patients with neuropsychiatric disorders using tdcs
topic individualization
atrophy
precision medicine
transcranial direct current stimulation
HD—conventional montage trade-off
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/14/12/1162
work_keys_str_mv AT sagarikabhattacharjee personalizeddoseselectionfortreatmentofpatientswithneuropsychiatricdisordersusingtdcs
AT rajankashyap personalizeddoseselectionfortreatmentofpatientswithneuropsychiatricdisordersusingtdcs
AT vanteemarssreeraj personalizeddoseselectionfortreatmentofpatientswithneuropsychiatricdisordersusingtdcs
AT palanimuthutsivakumar personalizeddoseselectionfortreatmentofpatientswithneuropsychiatricdisordersusingtdcs
AT ganesanvenkatasubramanian personalizeddoseselectionfortreatmentofpatientswithneuropsychiatricdisordersusingtdcs
AT johnedesmond personalizeddoseselectionfortreatmentofpatientswithneuropsychiatricdisordersusingtdcs
AT shannabelchen personalizeddoseselectionfortreatmentofpatientswithneuropsychiatricdisordersusingtdcs
AT tnsathyaprabha personalizeddoseselectionfortreatmentofpatientswithneuropsychiatricdisordersusingtdcs
AT kavirajaudupa personalizeddoseselectionfortreatmentofpatientswithneuropsychiatricdisordersusingtdcs