Personalized Dose Selection for Treatment of Patients with Neuropsychiatric Disorders Using tDCS
<b>Background</b>: Individualizing transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) parameters can improve precision in neuropsychiatric disorders. One important decision for the clinician is the selection of an appropriate montage—conventional or high-definition (HD)—to implement dose-con...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2024-11-01
|
Series: | Brain Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/14/12/1162 |
_version_ | 1826917875190857728 |
---|---|
author | Sagarika Bhattacharjee Rajan Kashyap Vanteemar S. Sreeraj Palanimuthu T. Sivakumar Ganesan Venkatasubramanian John E. Desmond S. H. Annabel Chen T. N. Sathyaprabha Kaviraja Udupa |
author_facet | Sagarika Bhattacharjee Rajan Kashyap Vanteemar S. Sreeraj Palanimuthu T. Sivakumar Ganesan Venkatasubramanian John E. Desmond S. H. Annabel Chen T. N. Sathyaprabha Kaviraja Udupa |
author_sort | Sagarika Bhattacharjee |
collection | DOAJ |
description | <b>Background</b>: Individualizing transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) parameters can improve precision in neuropsychiatric disorders. One important decision for the clinician is the selection of an appropriate montage—conventional or high-definition (HD)—to implement dose-controlled tDCS while maintaining the patient’s safety. <b>Method</b>: The present study simulated tDCS administration using T1-weighted brain images of 50 dementia, 25 depression patients, and 25 healthy individuals for two conventional and HD montages, targeting the regions of interest (ROIs) in the dorsal and ventral pathways that support language processing. For each tDCS configuration, the electric fields at the ROIs and the individualized dose required to achieve the desired current intensity at the target ROI across the subjects were estimated. Linear regression was performed on these parameters. <b>Result</b>: A significant relationship between atrophy and current dose that varies according to the disease was found. The dementia patients with significant brain atrophy required a higher personalized dosage for HD montage, as the current intensity at the target ROIs was lower and more variable than that of conventional montage. For dementia, tDCS individualization is pathway-dependent, wherein HD configuration of the dorsal route requires current dosages above the safety limit (>4 mA) for 46% of individuals. However, there was no significant difference in electrode configurations between the HD and traditional setups for depression and healthy volunteers without significant brain atrophy. <b>Conclusions</b>: HD-tDCS with fixed locations is limited, making conventional tDCS more effective for dose-controlled applications. In patients with atrophy, individualized adjustments based on simulations are needed due to the variable stimulation strength in the ROI. |
first_indexed | 2025-02-17T12:39:13Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-d4da28989585419ea2ea66bc7e575250 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2076-3425 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2025-02-17T12:39:13Z |
publishDate | 2024-11-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Brain Sciences |
spelling | doaj.art-d4da28989585419ea2ea66bc7e5752502024-12-27T14:14:39ZengMDPI AGBrain Sciences2076-34252024-11-011412116210.3390/brainsci14121162Personalized Dose Selection for Treatment of Patients with Neuropsychiatric Disorders Using tDCSSagarika Bhattacharjee0Rajan Kashyap1Vanteemar S. Sreeraj2Palanimuthu T. Sivakumar3Ganesan Venkatasubramanian4John E. Desmond5S. H. Annabel Chen6T. N. Sathyaprabha7Kaviraja Udupa8Department of Neurophysiology, National Institute of Mental Health & Neurosciences NIMHANS, Bengaluru 560029, IndiaDepartment of Neuroimaging and Interventional Radiology, National Institute of Mental Health & Neurosciences NIMHANS, Bengaluru 560029, IndiaDepartment of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health & Neurosciences NIMHANS, Bengaluru 560029, IndiaDepartment of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health & Neurosciences NIMHANS, Bengaluru 560029, IndiaDepartment of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health & Neurosciences NIMHANS, Bengaluru 560029, IndiaDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21218, USADepartment of Psychology, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798, SingaporeDepartment of Neurophysiology, National Institute of Mental Health & Neurosciences NIMHANS, Bengaluru 560029, IndiaDepartment of Neurophysiology, National Institute of Mental Health & Neurosciences NIMHANS, Bengaluru 560029, India<b>Background</b>: Individualizing transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) parameters can improve precision in neuropsychiatric disorders. One important decision for the clinician is the selection of an appropriate montage—conventional or high-definition (HD)—to implement dose-controlled tDCS while maintaining the patient’s safety. <b>Method</b>: The present study simulated tDCS administration using T1-weighted brain images of 50 dementia, 25 depression patients, and 25 healthy individuals for two conventional and HD montages, targeting the regions of interest (ROIs) in the dorsal and ventral pathways that support language processing. For each tDCS configuration, the electric fields at the ROIs and the individualized dose required to achieve the desired current intensity at the target ROI across the subjects were estimated. Linear regression was performed on these parameters. <b>Result</b>: A significant relationship between atrophy and current dose that varies according to the disease was found. The dementia patients with significant brain atrophy required a higher personalized dosage for HD montage, as the current intensity at the target ROIs was lower and more variable than that of conventional montage. For dementia, tDCS individualization is pathway-dependent, wherein HD configuration of the dorsal route requires current dosages above the safety limit (>4 mA) for 46% of individuals. However, there was no significant difference in electrode configurations between the HD and traditional setups for depression and healthy volunteers without significant brain atrophy. <b>Conclusions</b>: HD-tDCS with fixed locations is limited, making conventional tDCS more effective for dose-controlled applications. In patients with atrophy, individualized adjustments based on simulations are needed due to the variable stimulation strength in the ROI.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/14/12/1162individualizationatrophyprecision medicinetranscranial direct current stimulationHD—conventional montage trade-off |
spellingShingle | Sagarika Bhattacharjee Rajan Kashyap Vanteemar S. Sreeraj Palanimuthu T. Sivakumar Ganesan Venkatasubramanian John E. Desmond S. H. Annabel Chen T. N. Sathyaprabha Kaviraja Udupa Personalized Dose Selection for Treatment of Patients with Neuropsychiatric Disorders Using tDCS Brain Sciences individualization atrophy precision medicine transcranial direct current stimulation HD—conventional montage trade-off |
title | Personalized Dose Selection for Treatment of Patients with Neuropsychiatric Disorders Using tDCS |
title_full | Personalized Dose Selection for Treatment of Patients with Neuropsychiatric Disorders Using tDCS |
title_fullStr | Personalized Dose Selection for Treatment of Patients with Neuropsychiatric Disorders Using tDCS |
title_full_unstemmed | Personalized Dose Selection for Treatment of Patients with Neuropsychiatric Disorders Using tDCS |
title_short | Personalized Dose Selection for Treatment of Patients with Neuropsychiatric Disorders Using tDCS |
title_sort | personalized dose selection for treatment of patients with neuropsychiatric disorders using tdcs |
topic | individualization atrophy precision medicine transcranial direct current stimulation HD—conventional montage trade-off |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/14/12/1162 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sagarikabhattacharjee personalizeddoseselectionfortreatmentofpatientswithneuropsychiatricdisordersusingtdcs AT rajankashyap personalizeddoseselectionfortreatmentofpatientswithneuropsychiatricdisordersusingtdcs AT vanteemarssreeraj personalizeddoseselectionfortreatmentofpatientswithneuropsychiatricdisordersusingtdcs AT palanimuthutsivakumar personalizeddoseselectionfortreatmentofpatientswithneuropsychiatricdisordersusingtdcs AT ganesanvenkatasubramanian personalizeddoseselectionfortreatmentofpatientswithneuropsychiatricdisordersusingtdcs AT johnedesmond personalizeddoseselectionfortreatmentofpatientswithneuropsychiatricdisordersusingtdcs AT shannabelchen personalizeddoseselectionfortreatmentofpatientswithneuropsychiatricdisordersusingtdcs AT tnsathyaprabha personalizeddoseselectionfortreatmentofpatientswithneuropsychiatricdisordersusingtdcs AT kavirajaudupa personalizeddoseselectionfortreatmentofpatientswithneuropsychiatricdisordersusingtdcs |