Bystanders intervene to impede grooming in Western chimpanzees and sooty mangabeys

Grooming interactions benefit groomers, but may have negative consequences for bystanders. Grooming limits bystanders' grooming access and ensuing alliances could threaten the bystander's hierarchy rank or their previous investment in the groomers. To gain a competitive advantage, bystande...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alexander Mielke, Liran Samuni, Anna Preis, Jan F. Gogarten, Catherine Crockford, Roman M. Wittig
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Royal Society 2017-01-01
Series:Royal Society Open Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.171296
_version_ 1818452244213792768
author Alexander Mielke
Liran Samuni
Anna Preis
Jan F. Gogarten
Catherine Crockford
Roman M. Wittig
author_facet Alexander Mielke
Liran Samuni
Anna Preis
Jan F. Gogarten
Catherine Crockford
Roman M. Wittig
author_sort Alexander Mielke
collection DOAJ
description Grooming interactions benefit groomers, but may have negative consequences for bystanders. Grooming limits bystanders' grooming access and ensuing alliances could threaten the bystander's hierarchy rank or their previous investment in the groomers. To gain a competitive advantage, bystanders could intervene into a grooming bout to increase their own grooming access or to prevent the negative impact of others' grooming. We tested the impact of dominance rank and social relationships on grooming intervention likelihood and outcome in two sympatric primate species, Western chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) and sooty mangabeys (Cercocebus atys atys). In both species, rather than increasing their own access to preferred partners, bystanders intervened mainly when an alliance between groomers could have a negative impact on them: when the lower-ranking groomer was close to the bystander in rank, when either groomer was an affiliation partner whose services they could lose, or the groomers were not yet strongly affiliated with each other. Thus, bystanders in both species appear to monitor grooming interactions and intervene based on their own dominance rank and social relationships, as well as triadic awareness of the relationship between groomers. While the motivation to intervene did not differ between species, mangabeys appeared to be more constrained by dominance rank than chimpanzees.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T21:20:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d4ec53f289104cfaab793b943ddbbb42
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2054-5703
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T21:20:00Z
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher The Royal Society
record_format Article
series Royal Society Open Science
spelling doaj.art-d4ec53f289104cfaab793b943ddbbb422022-12-21T22:46:58ZengThe Royal SocietyRoyal Society Open Science2054-57032017-01-0141110.1098/rsos.171296171296Bystanders intervene to impede grooming in Western chimpanzees and sooty mangabeysAlexander MielkeLiran SamuniAnna PreisJan F. GogartenCatherine CrockfordRoman M. WittigGrooming interactions benefit groomers, but may have negative consequences for bystanders. Grooming limits bystanders' grooming access and ensuing alliances could threaten the bystander's hierarchy rank or their previous investment in the groomers. To gain a competitive advantage, bystanders could intervene into a grooming bout to increase their own grooming access or to prevent the negative impact of others' grooming. We tested the impact of dominance rank and social relationships on grooming intervention likelihood and outcome in two sympatric primate species, Western chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) and sooty mangabeys (Cercocebus atys atys). In both species, rather than increasing their own access to preferred partners, bystanders intervened mainly when an alliance between groomers could have a negative impact on them: when the lower-ranking groomer was close to the bystander in rank, when either groomer was an affiliation partner whose services they could lose, or the groomers were not yet strongly affiliated with each other. Thus, bystanders in both species appear to monitor grooming interactions and intervene based on their own dominance rank and social relationships, as well as triadic awareness of the relationship between groomers. While the motivation to intervene did not differ between species, mangabeys appeared to be more constrained by dominance rank than chimpanzees.https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.171296chimpanzeesooty mangabeygroominginterventionsbystander
spellingShingle Alexander Mielke
Liran Samuni
Anna Preis
Jan F. Gogarten
Catherine Crockford
Roman M. Wittig
Bystanders intervene to impede grooming in Western chimpanzees and sooty mangabeys
Royal Society Open Science
chimpanzee
sooty mangabey
grooming
interventions
bystander
title Bystanders intervene to impede grooming in Western chimpanzees and sooty mangabeys
title_full Bystanders intervene to impede grooming in Western chimpanzees and sooty mangabeys
title_fullStr Bystanders intervene to impede grooming in Western chimpanzees and sooty mangabeys
title_full_unstemmed Bystanders intervene to impede grooming in Western chimpanzees and sooty mangabeys
title_short Bystanders intervene to impede grooming in Western chimpanzees and sooty mangabeys
title_sort bystanders intervene to impede grooming in western chimpanzees and sooty mangabeys
topic chimpanzee
sooty mangabey
grooming
interventions
bystander
url https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.171296
work_keys_str_mv AT alexandermielke bystandersintervenetoimpedegroominginwesternchimpanzeesandsootymangabeys
AT liransamuni bystandersintervenetoimpedegroominginwesternchimpanzeesandsootymangabeys
AT annapreis bystandersintervenetoimpedegroominginwesternchimpanzeesandsootymangabeys
AT janfgogarten bystandersintervenetoimpedegroominginwesternchimpanzeesandsootymangabeys
AT catherinecrockford bystandersintervenetoimpedegroominginwesternchimpanzeesandsootymangabeys
AT romanmwittig bystandersintervenetoimpedegroominginwesternchimpanzeesandsootymangabeys