Study on the measurement error and scope of analytical gradient model in phase measuring deflectometry

The existing analytical gradient models in phase measuring deflectometry (PMD) usually suffer in the ambiguous problem. To solve this problem, simplification/assumption is often given to the surface shape, which causes non-ignorable measurement error in certain situations. In order to analyze the re...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Huimin Yue, Yuxiang Wu, Mingyang Li, Yong Liu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2018-12-01
Series:Results in Physics
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211379718319430
_version_ 1819274092861194240
author Huimin Yue
Yuxiang Wu
Mingyang Li
Yong Liu
author_facet Huimin Yue
Yuxiang Wu
Mingyang Li
Yong Liu
author_sort Huimin Yue
collection DOAJ
description The existing analytical gradient models in phase measuring deflectometry (PMD) usually suffer in the ambiguous problem. To solve this problem, simplification/assumption is often given to the surface shape, which causes non-ignorable measurement error in certain situations. In order to analyze the relation between the surface shape and measurement error when simplification/assumption is used, a ray tracing simulation model is developed in this paper. For any given PMD system setup, the relation between the height/slope variations of test surface and measurement accuracy can be carried out. The corresponding experiment work proves the correctness of this simulation model. The increasing of either the height or slope of object will lead to the exponential aggravating of measurement error. For our experiment setup, the measurement gradient error will be less than 0.5% if the ratio of the distance between the LCD (Liquid Crystal Display) screen and the reference plane and the STD (standard derivation) of object height is larger than 200. Keywords: Phase measuring deflectometry, Optical 3D measurement, Error analysis, Ray tracing model
first_indexed 2024-12-23T23:02:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d4f83e971c1b4f029e718c38d2075285
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2211-3797
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-23T23:02:56Z
publishDate 2018-12-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Results in Physics
spelling doaj.art-d4f83e971c1b4f029e718c38d20752852022-12-21T17:26:52ZengElsevierResults in Physics2211-37972018-12-0111994998Study on the measurement error and scope of analytical gradient model in phase measuring deflectometryHuimin Yue0Yuxiang Wu1Mingyang Li2Yong Liu3University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, School of Optoelectronic Science and Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Electronic Thin Films and Integrated Devices, Chengdu 610054, ChinaUniversity of Electronic Science and Technology of China, School of Optoelectronic Science and Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Electronic Thin Films and Integrated Devices, Chengdu 610054, China; Xidian University, School of Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, No. 2 South Taibai Road, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710071, China; Corresponding author at: Xidian University, School of Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, No. 2 South Taibai Road, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710071, China.University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, School of Optoelectronic Science and Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Electronic Thin Films and Integrated Devices, Chengdu 610054, ChinaUniversity of Electronic Science and Technology of China, School of Optoelectronic Science and Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Electronic Thin Films and Integrated Devices, Chengdu 610054, ChinaThe existing analytical gradient models in phase measuring deflectometry (PMD) usually suffer in the ambiguous problem. To solve this problem, simplification/assumption is often given to the surface shape, which causes non-ignorable measurement error in certain situations. In order to analyze the relation between the surface shape and measurement error when simplification/assumption is used, a ray tracing simulation model is developed in this paper. For any given PMD system setup, the relation between the height/slope variations of test surface and measurement accuracy can be carried out. The corresponding experiment work proves the correctness of this simulation model. The increasing of either the height or slope of object will lead to the exponential aggravating of measurement error. For our experiment setup, the measurement gradient error will be less than 0.5% if the ratio of the distance between the LCD (Liquid Crystal Display) screen and the reference plane and the STD (standard derivation) of object height is larger than 200. Keywords: Phase measuring deflectometry, Optical 3D measurement, Error analysis, Ray tracing modelhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211379718319430
spellingShingle Huimin Yue
Yuxiang Wu
Mingyang Li
Yong Liu
Study on the measurement error and scope of analytical gradient model in phase measuring deflectometry
Results in Physics
title Study on the measurement error and scope of analytical gradient model in phase measuring deflectometry
title_full Study on the measurement error and scope of analytical gradient model in phase measuring deflectometry
title_fullStr Study on the measurement error and scope of analytical gradient model in phase measuring deflectometry
title_full_unstemmed Study on the measurement error and scope of analytical gradient model in phase measuring deflectometry
title_short Study on the measurement error and scope of analytical gradient model in phase measuring deflectometry
title_sort study on the measurement error and scope of analytical gradient model in phase measuring deflectometry
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211379718319430
work_keys_str_mv AT huiminyue studyonthemeasurementerrorandscopeofanalyticalgradientmodelinphasemeasuringdeflectometry
AT yuxiangwu studyonthemeasurementerrorandscopeofanalyticalgradientmodelinphasemeasuringdeflectometry
AT mingyangli studyonthemeasurementerrorandscopeofanalyticalgradientmodelinphasemeasuringdeflectometry
AT yongliu studyonthemeasurementerrorandscopeofanalyticalgradientmodelinphasemeasuringdeflectometry