Utility of cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking strain assessment in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension for prediction of REVEAL 2.0 high risk status

Abstract Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension may be cured by pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA). Thromboembolic disease distribution/PEA success primarily determines prognosis but risk scoring criteria may be adjunctive. Right ventriculoarterial (RV‐PA) and ventriculoatrial (RV‐right atrium [R...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kai'En Leong, Luke Howard, Francesco Lo Giudice, Rachel Davies, Gulammehdi Haji, Simon Gibbs, Deepa Gopalan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-01-01
Series:Pulmonary Circulation
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/pul2.12116
_version_ 1827944806058295296
author Kai'En Leong
Luke Howard
Francesco Lo Giudice
Rachel Davies
Gulammehdi Haji
Simon Gibbs
Deepa Gopalan
author_facet Kai'En Leong
Luke Howard
Francesco Lo Giudice
Rachel Davies
Gulammehdi Haji
Simon Gibbs
Deepa Gopalan
author_sort Kai'En Leong
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension may be cured by pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA). Thromboembolic disease distribution/PEA success primarily determines prognosis but risk scoring criteria may be adjunctive. Right ventriculoarterial (RV‐PA) and ventriculoatrial (RV‐right atrium [RA]) coupling may be evaluated by cardiac MRI (CMR) feature tracking deformation/strain assessment. We characterized biatrial and biventricular CMR feature tracking (FT) strain parameters following PEA and tested the ability of CMR FT to identify REVEAL 2.0 high‐risk status. We undertook a retrospective single‐center cross‐sectional study of patients (n = 57) who underwent PEA (2015–2020). All underwent pre and postoperative catheterization and CMR. Pulmonary arterial hypertension validated risk scores were calculated. Significant postoperative improvements were observed in mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) (pre‐op 45 ± 11 mmHg vs. post‐op 26 ± 11 mmHg; p < 0.001) and PVR however a large proportion had residual pulmonary hypertension (45%; mPAP ≥25 mmHg). PEA augmented left heart filling with left ventricular end diastolic volume index and left atrial volume index increment. Left ventricular ejection fraction was unchanged postoperatively but LV global longitudinal strain improved (pre‐op median −14.2% vs. post‐op −16.0%; p < 0.001). Right ventricular (RV) geometry and function also improved with reduction in RV mass. Most had uncoupled RV‐PA relationships which recovered (pre‐op right ventricular free wall longitudinal strain −13.2 ± 4.8%, RV stroke volume/right ventricular end systolic volume ratio 0.78 ± 0.53 vs. post‐op −16.8 ± 4.2%, 1.32 ± 0.55; both p < 0.001). Postoperatively, there were six REVEAL 2.0 high‐risk patients, best predicted by impaired RA strain which was superior to traditional volumetric parameters (area under the curve [AUC] 0.99 vs. RVEF AUC 0.88). CMR deformation/strain evaluation can offer insights into coupling recovery; RA strain may be an expeditious surrogate for the more laborious REVEAL 2.0 score.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T10:35:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d51a2bb4acab434a80e691e5bbaa437d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-8940
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T10:35:28Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Pulmonary Circulation
spelling doaj.art-d51a2bb4acab434a80e691e5bbaa437d2023-05-18T06:26:29ZengWileyPulmonary Circulation2045-89402023-01-01131n/an/a10.1002/pul2.12116Utility of cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking strain assessment in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension for prediction of REVEAL 2.0 high risk statusKai'En Leong0Luke Howard1Francesco Lo Giudice2Rachel Davies3Gulammehdi Haji4Simon Gibbs5Deepa Gopalan6Department of Radiology Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust/Hammersmith Hospital London UKNational Pulmonary Hypertension Service Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust London UKNational Pulmonary Hypertension Service Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust London UKNational Pulmonary Hypertension Service Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust London UKNational Pulmonary Hypertension Service Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust London UKNational Heart & Lung Institute Imperial College London London UKDepartment of Radiology Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust/Hammersmith Hospital London UKAbstract Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension may be cured by pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA). Thromboembolic disease distribution/PEA success primarily determines prognosis but risk scoring criteria may be adjunctive. Right ventriculoarterial (RV‐PA) and ventriculoatrial (RV‐right atrium [RA]) coupling may be evaluated by cardiac MRI (CMR) feature tracking deformation/strain assessment. We characterized biatrial and biventricular CMR feature tracking (FT) strain parameters following PEA and tested the ability of CMR FT to identify REVEAL 2.0 high‐risk status. We undertook a retrospective single‐center cross‐sectional study of patients (n = 57) who underwent PEA (2015–2020). All underwent pre and postoperative catheterization and CMR. Pulmonary arterial hypertension validated risk scores were calculated. Significant postoperative improvements were observed in mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) (pre‐op 45 ± 11 mmHg vs. post‐op 26 ± 11 mmHg; p < 0.001) and PVR however a large proportion had residual pulmonary hypertension (45%; mPAP ≥25 mmHg). PEA augmented left heart filling with left ventricular end diastolic volume index and left atrial volume index increment. Left ventricular ejection fraction was unchanged postoperatively but LV global longitudinal strain improved (pre‐op median −14.2% vs. post‐op −16.0%; p < 0.001). Right ventricular (RV) geometry and function also improved with reduction in RV mass. Most had uncoupled RV‐PA relationships which recovered (pre‐op right ventricular free wall longitudinal strain −13.2 ± 4.8%, RV stroke volume/right ventricular end systolic volume ratio 0.78 ± 0.53 vs. post‐op −16.8 ± 4.2%, 1.32 ± 0.55; both p < 0.001). Postoperatively, there were six REVEAL 2.0 high‐risk patients, best predicted by impaired RA strain which was superior to traditional volumetric parameters (area under the curve [AUC] 0.99 vs. RVEF AUC 0.88). CMR deformation/strain evaluation can offer insights into coupling recovery; RA strain may be an expeditious surrogate for the more laborious REVEAL 2.0 score.https://doi.org/10.1002/pul2.12116feature tracking (CMR‐FT)pulmonary endarterectomystrainventriculoarterial couplingventriculoatrial coupling
spellingShingle Kai'En Leong
Luke Howard
Francesco Lo Giudice
Rachel Davies
Gulammehdi Haji
Simon Gibbs
Deepa Gopalan
Utility of cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking strain assessment in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension for prediction of REVEAL 2.0 high risk status
Pulmonary Circulation
feature tracking (CMR‐FT)
pulmonary endarterectomy
strain
ventriculoarterial coupling
ventriculoatrial coupling
title Utility of cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking strain assessment in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension for prediction of REVEAL 2.0 high risk status
title_full Utility of cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking strain assessment in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension for prediction of REVEAL 2.0 high risk status
title_fullStr Utility of cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking strain assessment in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension for prediction of REVEAL 2.0 high risk status
title_full_unstemmed Utility of cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking strain assessment in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension for prediction of REVEAL 2.0 high risk status
title_short Utility of cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking strain assessment in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension for prediction of REVEAL 2.0 high risk status
title_sort utility of cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking strain assessment in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension for prediction of reveal 2 0 high risk status
topic feature tracking (CMR‐FT)
pulmonary endarterectomy
strain
ventriculoarterial coupling
ventriculoatrial coupling
url https://doi.org/10.1002/pul2.12116
work_keys_str_mv AT kaienleong utilityofcardiacmagneticresonancefeaturetrackingstrainassessmentinchronicthromboembolicpulmonaryhypertensionforpredictionofreveal20highriskstatus
AT lukehoward utilityofcardiacmagneticresonancefeaturetrackingstrainassessmentinchronicthromboembolicpulmonaryhypertensionforpredictionofreveal20highriskstatus
AT francescologiudice utilityofcardiacmagneticresonancefeaturetrackingstrainassessmentinchronicthromboembolicpulmonaryhypertensionforpredictionofreveal20highriskstatus
AT racheldavies utilityofcardiacmagneticresonancefeaturetrackingstrainassessmentinchronicthromboembolicpulmonaryhypertensionforpredictionofreveal20highriskstatus
AT gulammehdihaji utilityofcardiacmagneticresonancefeaturetrackingstrainassessmentinchronicthromboembolicpulmonaryhypertensionforpredictionofreveal20highriskstatus
AT simongibbs utilityofcardiacmagneticresonancefeaturetrackingstrainassessmentinchronicthromboembolicpulmonaryhypertensionforpredictionofreveal20highriskstatus
AT deepagopalan utilityofcardiacmagneticresonancefeaturetrackingstrainassessmentinchronicthromboembolicpulmonaryhypertensionforpredictionofreveal20highriskstatus