Outcomes of migration as adaptation: a conceptual framework for migration governance

Climate change – along with conflict, violence, and climate-related disasters – has the potential to accelerate many forms of human migration and mobility, and yet almost all of the key migration outcomes of interest (the decision to migrate, the timing of migration, the preferred destinations, the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kali Abel, Brian Katz, Stefan Rose, David Wrathall
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2023-12-01
Series:Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/1943815X.2023.2246525
_version_ 1827155349438726144
author Kali Abel
Brian Katz
Stefan Rose
David Wrathall
author_facet Kali Abel
Brian Katz
Stefan Rose
David Wrathall
author_sort Kali Abel
collection DOAJ
description Climate change – along with conflict, violence, and climate-related disasters – has the potential to accelerate many forms of human migration and mobility, and yet almost all of the key migration outcomes of interest (the decision to migrate, the timing of migration, the preferred destinations, the condition of migrants, outcomes of migration, etc.) are determined by governance decisions. While it is well documented that migration as adaptation can increase the adaptive capacity for both migrants and destination communities, policy decisions can lead to both barriers to or opportunities for desired outcomes within a governance landscape. Though the decision to leave a place of origin is frequently studied, less attention has been given to the outcomes for migrants within a chosen destination, and the often-opaque elements that contribute to destinations being preferred or avoided. Under current climate change scenarios, the demand for migration as adaptation is increasing and the conceptual framework presented here is guided by the need to understand how intended and unintended consequences of host-centred, migrant-centred, or mutual migration governance affect migrants in a destination regardless of the driver. The conceptual framework we present, comprised of four potential governance “quadrants”, is used for defining variability within a polycentric governance landscape in order to understand the formal and informal governance elements that produce outcomes for both migrant and host communities. We then apply the framework, making contact with three case studies within Oregon’s diverse governance landscape, and explore the degree to which variability in a governance landscape creates destinations that are favourable or unfavourable to migrants, elucidating the informal and formal governance elements that enable or limit preferred migration outcomes. In a future in which migration is likely to be influenced by a changing climate, a conceptual framework, such as this may aid in elucidating the structural conditions that shape livelihood outcomes for migrants and host communities.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T21:15:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d51c446e00584ceab493e9a94eab8e11
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1943-815X
1943-8168
language English
last_indexed 2025-03-20T22:52:08Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences
spelling doaj.art-d51c446e00584ceab493e9a94eab8e112024-08-05T11:09:24ZengTaylor & Francis GroupJournal of Integrative Environmental Sciences1943-815X1943-81682023-12-0120110.1080/1943815X.2023.2246525Outcomes of migration as adaptation: a conceptual framework for migration governanceKali Abel0Brian Katz1Stefan Rose2David Wrathall3Department of Environmental Studies, University of Portland, Portland, OR, USADepartment of Geography, College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USADepartment of Geography, College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USADepartment of Geography, College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USAClimate change – along with conflict, violence, and climate-related disasters – has the potential to accelerate many forms of human migration and mobility, and yet almost all of the key migration outcomes of interest (the decision to migrate, the timing of migration, the preferred destinations, the condition of migrants, outcomes of migration, etc.) are determined by governance decisions. While it is well documented that migration as adaptation can increase the adaptive capacity for both migrants and destination communities, policy decisions can lead to both barriers to or opportunities for desired outcomes within a governance landscape. Though the decision to leave a place of origin is frequently studied, less attention has been given to the outcomes for migrants within a chosen destination, and the often-opaque elements that contribute to destinations being preferred or avoided. Under current climate change scenarios, the demand for migration as adaptation is increasing and the conceptual framework presented here is guided by the need to understand how intended and unintended consequences of host-centred, migrant-centred, or mutual migration governance affect migrants in a destination regardless of the driver. The conceptual framework we present, comprised of four potential governance “quadrants”, is used for defining variability within a polycentric governance landscape in order to understand the formal and informal governance elements that produce outcomes for both migrant and host communities. We then apply the framework, making contact with three case studies within Oregon’s diverse governance landscape, and explore the degree to which variability in a governance landscape creates destinations that are favourable or unfavourable to migrants, elucidating the informal and formal governance elements that enable or limit preferred migration outcomes. In a future in which migration is likely to be influenced by a changing climate, a conceptual framework, such as this may aid in elucidating the structural conditions that shape livelihood outcomes for migrants and host communities.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/1943815X.2023.2246525polycentricitymigrationgovernance outcomesclimate change
spellingShingle Kali Abel
Brian Katz
Stefan Rose
David Wrathall
Outcomes of migration as adaptation: a conceptual framework for migration governance
Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences
polycentricity
migration
governance outcomes
climate change
title Outcomes of migration as adaptation: a conceptual framework for migration governance
title_full Outcomes of migration as adaptation: a conceptual framework for migration governance
title_fullStr Outcomes of migration as adaptation: a conceptual framework for migration governance
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes of migration as adaptation: a conceptual framework for migration governance
title_short Outcomes of migration as adaptation: a conceptual framework for migration governance
title_sort outcomes of migration as adaptation a conceptual framework for migration governance
topic polycentricity
migration
governance outcomes
climate change
url https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/1943815X.2023.2246525
work_keys_str_mv AT kaliabel outcomesofmigrationasadaptationaconceptualframeworkformigrationgovernance
AT briankatz outcomesofmigrationasadaptationaconceptualframeworkformigrationgovernance
AT stefanrose outcomesofmigrationasadaptationaconceptualframeworkformigrationgovernance
AT davidwrathall outcomesofmigrationasadaptationaconceptualframeworkformigrationgovernance