A Comparison of Three Temporal Smoothing Algorithms to Improve Land Cover Classification: A Case Study from NEPAL

Time series land cover data statistics often fluctuate abruptly due to seasonal impact and other noise in the input image. Temporal smoothing techniques are used to reduce the noise in time series data used in land cover mapping. The effects of smoothing may vary based on the smoothing method and la...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nishanta Khanal, Mir Abdul Matin, Kabir Uddin, Ate Poortinga, Farrukh Chishtie, Karis Tenneson, David Saah
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-09-01
Series:Remote Sensing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/12/18/2888
_version_ 1827706767016984576
author Nishanta Khanal
Mir Abdul Matin
Kabir Uddin
Ate Poortinga
Farrukh Chishtie
Karis Tenneson
David Saah
author_facet Nishanta Khanal
Mir Abdul Matin
Kabir Uddin
Ate Poortinga
Farrukh Chishtie
Karis Tenneson
David Saah
author_sort Nishanta Khanal
collection DOAJ
description Time series land cover data statistics often fluctuate abruptly due to seasonal impact and other noise in the input image. Temporal smoothing techniques are used to reduce the noise in time series data used in land cover mapping. The effects of smoothing may vary based on the smoothing method and land cover category. In this study, we compared the performance of Fourier transformation smoothing, Whittaker smoother and Linear-Fit averaging smoother on Landsat 5, 7 and 8 based yearly composites to classify land cover in Province No. 1 of Nepal. The performance of each smoother was tested based on whether it was applied on image composites or on land cover primitives generated using the random forest machine learning method. The land cover data used in the study was from the years 2000 to 2018. Probability distribution was examined to check the quality of primitives and accuracy of the final land cover maps were accessed. The best results were found for the Whittaker smoothing for stable classes and Fourier smoothing for other classes. The results also show that classification using a properly selected smoothing algorithm outperforms a classification based on its unsmoothed data set. The final land cover generated by combining the best results obtained from different smoothing approaches increased our overall land cover map accuracy from 79.18% to 83.44%. This study shows that smoothing can result in a substantial increase in the quality of the results and that the smoothing approach should be carefully considered for each land cover class.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T16:32:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d521ea97da4c4f159e5a98c8c7ae54b7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2072-4292
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T16:32:17Z
publishDate 2020-09-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Remote Sensing
spelling doaj.art-d521ea97da4c4f159e5a98c8c7ae54b72023-11-20T12:46:42ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922020-09-011218288810.3390/rs12182888A Comparison of Three Temporal Smoothing Algorithms to Improve Land Cover Classification: A Case Study from NEPALNishanta Khanal0Mir Abdul Matin1Kabir Uddin2Ate Poortinga3Farrukh Chishtie4Karis Tenneson5David Saah6International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development, Kathmandu GPO Box 3226, NepalInternational Centre for Integrated Mountain Development, Kathmandu GPO Box 3226, NepalInternational Centre for Integrated Mountain Development, Kathmandu GPO Box 3226, NepalSpatial Informatics Group, LLC, 2529 Yolanda Ct., Pleasanton, CA 94566, USASpatial Informatics Group, LLC, 2529 Yolanda Ct., Pleasanton, CA 94566, USASpatial Informatics Group, LLC, 2529 Yolanda Ct., Pleasanton, CA 94566, USASpatial Informatics Group, LLC, 2529 Yolanda Ct., Pleasanton, CA 94566, USATime series land cover data statistics often fluctuate abruptly due to seasonal impact and other noise in the input image. Temporal smoothing techniques are used to reduce the noise in time series data used in land cover mapping. The effects of smoothing may vary based on the smoothing method and land cover category. In this study, we compared the performance of Fourier transformation smoothing, Whittaker smoother and Linear-Fit averaging smoother on Landsat 5, 7 and 8 based yearly composites to classify land cover in Province No. 1 of Nepal. The performance of each smoother was tested based on whether it was applied on image composites or on land cover primitives generated using the random forest machine learning method. The land cover data used in the study was from the years 2000 to 2018. Probability distribution was examined to check the quality of primitives and accuracy of the final land cover maps were accessed. The best results were found for the Whittaker smoothing for stable classes and Fourier smoothing for other classes. The results also show that classification using a properly selected smoothing algorithm outperforms a classification based on its unsmoothed data set. The final land cover generated by combining the best results obtained from different smoothing approaches increased our overall land cover map accuracy from 79.18% to 83.44%. This study shows that smoothing can result in a substantial increase in the quality of the results and that the smoothing approach should be carefully considered for each land cover class.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/12/18/2888remote sensingtemporal smoothinggoogle earth enginemachine learningrandom forestland cover
spellingShingle Nishanta Khanal
Mir Abdul Matin
Kabir Uddin
Ate Poortinga
Farrukh Chishtie
Karis Tenneson
David Saah
A Comparison of Three Temporal Smoothing Algorithms to Improve Land Cover Classification: A Case Study from NEPAL
Remote Sensing
remote sensing
temporal smoothing
google earth engine
machine learning
random forest
land cover
title A Comparison of Three Temporal Smoothing Algorithms to Improve Land Cover Classification: A Case Study from NEPAL
title_full A Comparison of Three Temporal Smoothing Algorithms to Improve Land Cover Classification: A Case Study from NEPAL
title_fullStr A Comparison of Three Temporal Smoothing Algorithms to Improve Land Cover Classification: A Case Study from NEPAL
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Three Temporal Smoothing Algorithms to Improve Land Cover Classification: A Case Study from NEPAL
title_short A Comparison of Three Temporal Smoothing Algorithms to Improve Land Cover Classification: A Case Study from NEPAL
title_sort comparison of three temporal smoothing algorithms to improve land cover classification a case study from nepal
topic remote sensing
temporal smoothing
google earth engine
machine learning
random forest
land cover
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/12/18/2888
work_keys_str_mv AT nishantakhanal acomparisonofthreetemporalsmoothingalgorithmstoimprovelandcoverclassificationacasestudyfromnepal
AT mirabdulmatin acomparisonofthreetemporalsmoothingalgorithmstoimprovelandcoverclassificationacasestudyfromnepal
AT kabiruddin acomparisonofthreetemporalsmoothingalgorithmstoimprovelandcoverclassificationacasestudyfromnepal
AT atepoortinga acomparisonofthreetemporalsmoothingalgorithmstoimprovelandcoverclassificationacasestudyfromnepal
AT farrukhchishtie acomparisonofthreetemporalsmoothingalgorithmstoimprovelandcoverclassificationacasestudyfromnepal
AT karistenneson acomparisonofthreetemporalsmoothingalgorithmstoimprovelandcoverclassificationacasestudyfromnepal
AT davidsaah acomparisonofthreetemporalsmoothingalgorithmstoimprovelandcoverclassificationacasestudyfromnepal
AT nishantakhanal comparisonofthreetemporalsmoothingalgorithmstoimprovelandcoverclassificationacasestudyfromnepal
AT mirabdulmatin comparisonofthreetemporalsmoothingalgorithmstoimprovelandcoverclassificationacasestudyfromnepal
AT kabiruddin comparisonofthreetemporalsmoothingalgorithmstoimprovelandcoverclassificationacasestudyfromnepal
AT atepoortinga comparisonofthreetemporalsmoothingalgorithmstoimprovelandcoverclassificationacasestudyfromnepal
AT farrukhchishtie comparisonofthreetemporalsmoothingalgorithmstoimprovelandcoverclassificationacasestudyfromnepal
AT karistenneson comparisonofthreetemporalsmoothingalgorithmstoimprovelandcoverclassificationacasestudyfromnepal
AT davidsaah comparisonofthreetemporalsmoothingalgorithmstoimprovelandcoverclassificationacasestudyfromnepal