Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration versus Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Biopsy for Pancreatic Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction: One of the most effective diagnostic tools for pancreatic cancer is endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) or biopsy (EUS-FNB). Several randomized clinical trials have compared different EUS tissue sampling needles for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Objectiv...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Galab M. Hassan, Louise Laporte, Sarto C. Paquin, Charles Menard, Anand V. Sahai, Benoît Mâsse, Helen Trottier
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-11-01
Series:Diagnostics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/12/12/2951
_version_ 1797460699075575808
author Galab M. Hassan
Louise Laporte
Sarto C. Paquin
Charles Menard
Anand V. Sahai
Benoît Mâsse
Helen Trottier
author_facet Galab M. Hassan
Louise Laporte
Sarto C. Paquin
Charles Menard
Anand V. Sahai
Benoît Mâsse
Helen Trottier
author_sort Galab M. Hassan
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: One of the most effective diagnostic tools for pancreatic cancer is endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) or biopsy (EUS-FNB). Several randomized clinical trials have compared different EUS tissue sampling needles for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Objective: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-guided FNA as EUS-FNB needles for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer using a systematic review and meta-analysis. Method: A literature review with a meta-analysis was performed according to the PRISMA guide. The databases of PubMed, Cochrane and Google Scholar were used, including studies published between 2011–2021 comparing the diagnostic yield (diagnostic accuracy or probability of positivity, sensitivity, specificity, predictive value) of EUS-FNA and EUS-FNB for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. The primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy. Random effect models allowed estimation of the pooled odds ratio with a confidence interval (CI) of 95%. Results: Nine randomized control trials were selected out of 5802 articles identified. Among these, five studies found no statistically significant difference between the EUS-FNA and EUS-FNB, whereas the other four did. The meta-analysis found EUS-FNB accuracy superior to EUS-FNA for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer with a pooled odds ratio of 1.87 (IC 95%: 1.33–2.63). Conclusion: As compared to EUS-FNA, EUS-FNB seems to improve diagnostic accuracy when applied to suspicious pancreatic lesions.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T17:08:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d533828dcfd64ee39642b3415a43d538
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2075-4418
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T17:08:45Z
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Diagnostics
spelling doaj.art-d533828dcfd64ee39642b3415a43d5382023-11-24T14:16:03ZengMDPI AGDiagnostics2075-44182022-11-011212295110.3390/diagnostics12122951Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration versus Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Biopsy for Pancreatic Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisGalab M. Hassan0Louise Laporte1Sarto C. Paquin2Charles Menard3Anand V. Sahai4Benoît Mâsse5Helen Trottier6Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Réseau Hospitalier Neuchâtelois, 2000 Neuchâtel, SwitzerlandResearch Center, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, QC H3T 1C5, CanadaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H2X 3E4, CanadaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC J1H 4C6, CanadaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H2X 3E4, CanadaSchool of Public Health, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H3T 1C5, CanadaSchool of Public Health, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H3T 1C5, CanadaIntroduction: One of the most effective diagnostic tools for pancreatic cancer is endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) or biopsy (EUS-FNB). Several randomized clinical trials have compared different EUS tissue sampling needles for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Objective: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-guided FNA as EUS-FNB needles for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer using a systematic review and meta-analysis. Method: A literature review with a meta-analysis was performed according to the PRISMA guide. The databases of PubMed, Cochrane and Google Scholar were used, including studies published between 2011–2021 comparing the diagnostic yield (diagnostic accuracy or probability of positivity, sensitivity, specificity, predictive value) of EUS-FNA and EUS-FNB for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. The primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy. Random effect models allowed estimation of the pooled odds ratio with a confidence interval (CI) of 95%. Results: Nine randomized control trials were selected out of 5802 articles identified. Among these, five studies found no statistically significant difference between the EUS-FNA and EUS-FNB, whereas the other four did. The meta-analysis found EUS-FNB accuracy superior to EUS-FNA for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer with a pooled odds ratio of 1.87 (IC 95%: 1.33–2.63). Conclusion: As compared to EUS-FNA, EUS-FNB seems to improve diagnostic accuracy when applied to suspicious pancreatic lesions.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/12/12/2951fine-needle aspirationfine-needle biopsypancreatic cancerdiagnostic accuracy
spellingShingle Galab M. Hassan
Louise Laporte
Sarto C. Paquin
Charles Menard
Anand V. Sahai
Benoît Mâsse
Helen Trottier
Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration versus Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Biopsy for Pancreatic Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Diagnostics
fine-needle aspiration
fine-needle biopsy
pancreatic cancer
diagnostic accuracy
title Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration versus Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Biopsy for Pancreatic Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration versus Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Biopsy for Pancreatic Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration versus Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Biopsy for Pancreatic Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration versus Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Biopsy for Pancreatic Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration versus Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Biopsy for Pancreatic Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration versus endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle biopsy for pancreatic cancer diagnosis a systematic review and meta analysis
topic fine-needle aspiration
fine-needle biopsy
pancreatic cancer
diagnostic accuracy
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/12/12/2951
work_keys_str_mv AT galabmhassan endoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationversusendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedlebiopsyforpancreaticcancerdiagnosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT louiselaporte endoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationversusendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedlebiopsyforpancreaticcancerdiagnosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sartocpaquin endoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationversusendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedlebiopsyforpancreaticcancerdiagnosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT charlesmenard endoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationversusendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedlebiopsyforpancreaticcancerdiagnosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT anandvsahai endoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationversusendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedlebiopsyforpancreaticcancerdiagnosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT benoitmasse endoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationversusendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedlebiopsyforpancreaticcancerdiagnosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT helentrottier endoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationversusendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedlebiopsyforpancreaticcancerdiagnosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis