Optimising invasive fish management in the context of invasive species legislation in South Africa

Background: South Africa hosts a large number of non-native freshwater fishes that were introduced for various industries. Many of these species are now listed under the National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act (NEM:BA) Alien and Invasive Species (A&IS) lists and regulations, though t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Darragh J. Woodford, Phillip Ivey, Martine S. Jordaan, Peter K. Kimberg, Tsungai Zengeya, Olaf L.F. Weyl
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: South African National Biodiversity Institut 2017-03-01
Series:Bothalia: African Biodiversity & Conservation
Subjects:
Online Access:https://abcjournal.org/index.php/abc/article/view/2138
_version_ 1818458050898427904
author Darragh J. Woodford
Phillip Ivey
Martine S. Jordaan
Peter K. Kimberg
Tsungai Zengeya
Olaf L.F. Weyl
author_facet Darragh J. Woodford
Phillip Ivey
Martine S. Jordaan
Peter K. Kimberg
Tsungai Zengeya
Olaf L.F. Weyl
author_sort Darragh J. Woodford
collection DOAJ
description Background: South Africa hosts a large number of non-native freshwater fishes that were introduced for various industries. Many of these species are now listed under the National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act (NEM:BA) Alien and Invasive Species (A&IS) lists and regulations, though the practical options available to conservation agencies to effectively manage these fishes vary greatly among species and regions. Objectives & methods: We assessed the history and status of national legislation pertaining to invasive freshwater fishes, and the practical implications of the legislation for managing different species with contrasting distributions, impacts and utilisation value. Results: The smallmouth bass, despite being a potential conflict-generating species, is fairly straightforward to manage based on current legislation. Two species of trout, which remain absent from the NEM:BA A&IS lists because of ongoing consultation with stakeholders, continue to be managed in regions like the Western Cape province using existing provincial legislation. To maximise the limited capacity for management within conservation agencies, we proposed a decision-support tool that prioritises invasive fish populations that represent high environmental risk and low potential for conflict with stakeholders. Using three case studies, we demonstrated how the tool can be used to set management goals of ‘eradicate’, ‘manage against impacts and further spread’ and ‘continue to monitor population’ as the most pragmatic solutions given the state of an invasion, its socio-economic impact and the capacity of the responsible agency to act. Conclusion: By choosing a pragmatic management strategy, conservation agencies can maximise the effective deployment of limited resources, while minimising avoidable conflicts with stakeholders.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T22:52:18Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d53f7417b367402088f3e3bea2333ee9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0006-8241
2311-9284
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T22:52:18Z
publishDate 2017-03-01
publisher South African National Biodiversity Institut
record_format Article
series Bothalia: African Biodiversity & Conservation
spelling doaj.art-d53f7417b367402088f3e3bea2333ee92022-12-21T22:44:41ZengSouth African National Biodiversity InstitutBothalia: African Biodiversity & Conservation0006-82412311-92842017-03-01472e1e910.4102/abc.v47i2.21381879Optimising invasive fish management in the context of invasive species legislation in South AfricaDarragh J. Woodford0Phillip Ivey1Martine S. Jordaan2Peter K. Kimberg3Tsungai Zengeya4Olaf L.F. Weyl5Centre for Invasion Biology, School of Animal, Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand; South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity (SAIAB), GrahamstownSouth African National Biodiversity Institute, Cussonia, PretoriaSouth African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity (SAIAB), Grahamstown; Cape Nature Scientific Services CapeNature Scientific Services, StellenboschThe Biodiversity Company (TBC), JohannesburgSouth African National Biodiversity Institute, Cussonia, Pretoria,South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity (SAIAB), Grahamstown; Centre for Invasion Biology, SAIAB, GrahamstownBackground: South Africa hosts a large number of non-native freshwater fishes that were introduced for various industries. Many of these species are now listed under the National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act (NEM:BA) Alien and Invasive Species (A&IS) lists and regulations, though the practical options available to conservation agencies to effectively manage these fishes vary greatly among species and regions. Objectives & methods: We assessed the history and status of national legislation pertaining to invasive freshwater fishes, and the practical implications of the legislation for managing different species with contrasting distributions, impacts and utilisation value. Results: The smallmouth bass, despite being a potential conflict-generating species, is fairly straightforward to manage based on current legislation. Two species of trout, which remain absent from the NEM:BA A&IS lists because of ongoing consultation with stakeholders, continue to be managed in regions like the Western Cape province using existing provincial legislation. To maximise the limited capacity for management within conservation agencies, we proposed a decision-support tool that prioritises invasive fish populations that represent high environmental risk and low potential for conflict with stakeholders. Using three case studies, we demonstrated how the tool can be used to set management goals of ‘eradicate’, ‘manage against impacts and further spread’ and ‘continue to monitor population’ as the most pragmatic solutions given the state of an invasion, its socio-economic impact and the capacity of the responsible agency to act. Conclusion: By choosing a pragmatic management strategy, conservation agencies can maximise the effective deployment of limited resources, while minimising avoidable conflicts with stakeholders.https://abcjournal.org/index.php/abc/article/view/2138National legislationconflict speciesdecision support frameworkmanagement approach
spellingShingle Darragh J. Woodford
Phillip Ivey
Martine S. Jordaan
Peter K. Kimberg
Tsungai Zengeya
Olaf L.F. Weyl
Optimising invasive fish management in the context of invasive species legislation in South Africa
Bothalia: African Biodiversity & Conservation
National legislation
conflict species
decision support framework
management approach
title Optimising invasive fish management in the context of invasive species legislation in South Africa
title_full Optimising invasive fish management in the context of invasive species legislation in South Africa
title_fullStr Optimising invasive fish management in the context of invasive species legislation in South Africa
title_full_unstemmed Optimising invasive fish management in the context of invasive species legislation in South Africa
title_short Optimising invasive fish management in the context of invasive species legislation in South Africa
title_sort optimising invasive fish management in the context of invasive species legislation in south africa
topic National legislation
conflict species
decision support framework
management approach
url https://abcjournal.org/index.php/abc/article/view/2138
work_keys_str_mv AT darraghjwoodford optimisinginvasivefishmanagementinthecontextofinvasivespecieslegislationinsouthafrica
AT phillipivey optimisinginvasivefishmanagementinthecontextofinvasivespecieslegislationinsouthafrica
AT martinesjordaan optimisinginvasivefishmanagementinthecontextofinvasivespecieslegislationinsouthafrica
AT peterkkimberg optimisinginvasivefishmanagementinthecontextofinvasivespecieslegislationinsouthafrica
AT tsungaizengeya optimisinginvasivefishmanagementinthecontextofinvasivespecieslegislationinsouthafrica
AT olaflfweyl optimisinginvasivefishmanagementinthecontextofinvasivespecieslegislationinsouthafrica