Effects of surgical and FFP2 masks on cardiopulmonary exercise capacity in patients with heart failure.

<h4>Aims</h4>Surgical and FFP2 masks are recommended to reduce transmission of SARS-CoV-2. The cardiopulmonary effects of facemasks in patients with chronic heart failure are unknown. This prospective, cross-over study quantified the effects of wearing no mask (nm), surgical mask (sm), a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alexander Kogel, Pierre Hepp, Tina Stegmann, Adrienn Tünnemann-Tarr, Roberto Falz, Patrick Fischer, Felix Mahfoud, Ulrich Laufs, Sven Fikenzer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2022-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269470
_version_ 1811302525806051328
author Alexander Kogel
Pierre Hepp
Tina Stegmann
Adrienn Tünnemann-Tarr
Roberto Falz
Patrick Fischer
Felix Mahfoud
Ulrich Laufs
Sven Fikenzer
author_facet Alexander Kogel
Pierre Hepp
Tina Stegmann
Adrienn Tünnemann-Tarr
Roberto Falz
Patrick Fischer
Felix Mahfoud
Ulrich Laufs
Sven Fikenzer
author_sort Alexander Kogel
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Aims</h4>Surgical and FFP2 masks are recommended to reduce transmission of SARS-CoV-2. The cardiopulmonary effects of facemasks in patients with chronic heart failure are unknown. This prospective, cross-over study quantified the effects of wearing no mask (nm), surgical mask (sm), and FFP2 mask (ffpm) in patients with stable heart failure.<h4>Methods</h4>12 patients with clinically stable chronic heart failure (HF) (age 63.8±12 years, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 43.8±11%, NTProBNP 573±567 pg/ml) underwent spiroergometry with and without masks in a randomized sequence. Comfort/discomfort was assessed using a standardized questionnaire.<h4>Results</h4>Maximum power was reduced with both types of masks (nm: 108.3 W vs. sm: 101.2 W vs. ffpm: 95.6 W, p<0.01). Maximum respiratory oxygen uptake (1499ml/min vs. 1481 ml/min vs. 1300 ml/min, p = 0.95 and <0.01), peak ventilation (62.1 l/min vs. 56.4 l/min vs. 50.3 l/min, p = 0.15 and p<0.05) and O2-pulse (11.6 ml/beat vs. 11.8 ml/beat vs. 10.6 ml/beat, p = 0.87 and p<0.01) were significantly changed with ffpm but not sm. Discomfort was moderately but significantly increased (nm: 1.6 vs. sm: 3.4 vs. ffpm: 4.4, p<0.05).<h4>Conclusion</h4>Both surgical and FFP masks reduce exercise capacity in heart failure patients, while FFP2 masks reduce oxygen uptake and peak ventilation. This reduction in cardiopulmonary performance should be considered in heart failure patients whose daily life activities are often just as challenging as exercise is for healthy adults.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T07:30:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d548660b495f424ab2da97c755c8268b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T07:30:40Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-d548660b495f424ab2da97c755c8268b2022-12-22T02:56:22ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032022-01-01178e026947010.1371/journal.pone.0269470Effects of surgical and FFP2 masks on cardiopulmonary exercise capacity in patients with heart failure.Alexander KogelPierre HeppTina StegmannAdrienn Tünnemann-TarrRoberto FalzPatrick FischerFelix MahfoudUlrich LaufsSven Fikenzer<h4>Aims</h4>Surgical and FFP2 masks are recommended to reduce transmission of SARS-CoV-2. The cardiopulmonary effects of facemasks in patients with chronic heart failure are unknown. This prospective, cross-over study quantified the effects of wearing no mask (nm), surgical mask (sm), and FFP2 mask (ffpm) in patients with stable heart failure.<h4>Methods</h4>12 patients with clinically stable chronic heart failure (HF) (age 63.8±12 years, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 43.8±11%, NTProBNP 573±567 pg/ml) underwent spiroergometry with and without masks in a randomized sequence. Comfort/discomfort was assessed using a standardized questionnaire.<h4>Results</h4>Maximum power was reduced with both types of masks (nm: 108.3 W vs. sm: 101.2 W vs. ffpm: 95.6 W, p<0.01). Maximum respiratory oxygen uptake (1499ml/min vs. 1481 ml/min vs. 1300 ml/min, p = 0.95 and <0.01), peak ventilation (62.1 l/min vs. 56.4 l/min vs. 50.3 l/min, p = 0.15 and p<0.05) and O2-pulse (11.6 ml/beat vs. 11.8 ml/beat vs. 10.6 ml/beat, p = 0.87 and p<0.01) were significantly changed with ffpm but not sm. Discomfort was moderately but significantly increased (nm: 1.6 vs. sm: 3.4 vs. ffpm: 4.4, p<0.05).<h4>Conclusion</h4>Both surgical and FFP masks reduce exercise capacity in heart failure patients, while FFP2 masks reduce oxygen uptake and peak ventilation. This reduction in cardiopulmonary performance should be considered in heart failure patients whose daily life activities are often just as challenging as exercise is for healthy adults.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269470
spellingShingle Alexander Kogel
Pierre Hepp
Tina Stegmann
Adrienn Tünnemann-Tarr
Roberto Falz
Patrick Fischer
Felix Mahfoud
Ulrich Laufs
Sven Fikenzer
Effects of surgical and FFP2 masks on cardiopulmonary exercise capacity in patients with heart failure.
PLoS ONE
title Effects of surgical and FFP2 masks on cardiopulmonary exercise capacity in patients with heart failure.
title_full Effects of surgical and FFP2 masks on cardiopulmonary exercise capacity in patients with heart failure.
title_fullStr Effects of surgical and FFP2 masks on cardiopulmonary exercise capacity in patients with heart failure.
title_full_unstemmed Effects of surgical and FFP2 masks on cardiopulmonary exercise capacity in patients with heart failure.
title_short Effects of surgical and FFP2 masks on cardiopulmonary exercise capacity in patients with heart failure.
title_sort effects of surgical and ffp2 masks on cardiopulmonary exercise capacity in patients with heart failure
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269470
work_keys_str_mv AT alexanderkogel effectsofsurgicalandffp2masksoncardiopulmonaryexercisecapacityinpatientswithheartfailure
AT pierrehepp effectsofsurgicalandffp2masksoncardiopulmonaryexercisecapacityinpatientswithheartfailure
AT tinastegmann effectsofsurgicalandffp2masksoncardiopulmonaryexercisecapacityinpatientswithheartfailure
AT adrienntunnemanntarr effectsofsurgicalandffp2masksoncardiopulmonaryexercisecapacityinpatientswithheartfailure
AT robertofalz effectsofsurgicalandffp2masksoncardiopulmonaryexercisecapacityinpatientswithheartfailure
AT patrickfischer effectsofsurgicalandffp2masksoncardiopulmonaryexercisecapacityinpatientswithheartfailure
AT felixmahfoud effectsofsurgicalandffp2masksoncardiopulmonaryexercisecapacityinpatientswithheartfailure
AT ulrichlaufs effectsofsurgicalandffp2masksoncardiopulmonaryexercisecapacityinpatientswithheartfailure
AT svenfikenzer effectsofsurgicalandffp2masksoncardiopulmonaryexercisecapacityinpatientswithheartfailure