Machine Learning for Model Error Inference and Correction

Abstract Model error is one of the main obstacles to improved accuracy and reliability in numerical weather prediction (NWP) and climate prediction conducted with state‐of‐the‐art, comprehensive high‐resolution general circulation models. In a data assimilation framework, recent advances in the cont...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Massimo Bonavita, Patrick Laloyaux
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Geophysical Union (AGU) 2020-12-01
Series:Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002232
_version_ 1819118979781754880
author Massimo Bonavita
Patrick Laloyaux
author_facet Massimo Bonavita
Patrick Laloyaux
author_sort Massimo Bonavita
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Model error is one of the main obstacles to improved accuracy and reliability in numerical weather prediction (NWP) and climate prediction conducted with state‐of‐the‐art, comprehensive high‐resolution general circulation models. In a data assimilation framework, recent advances in the context of weak‐constraint 4D‐Var have shown that it is possible to estimate and correct for a large fraction of systematic model error which develops in the stratosphere over short forecast ranges. The recent explosion of interest in machine learning/deep learning technologies has been driven by their remarkable success in disparate application areas. This raises the question of whether model error estimation and correction in operational NWP and climate prediction can also benefit from these techniques. In this work, we aim to start to give an answer to this question. Specifically, we show that artificial neural networks (ANNs) can reproduce the main results obtained with weak‐constraint 4D‐Var in the operational configuration of the IFS model of the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF). We show that the use of ANN models inside the weak‐constraint 4D‐Var framework has the potential to extend the applicability of the weak‐constraint methodology for model error correction to the whole atmospheric column. Finally, we discuss the potential and limitations of the machine learning/deep learning technologies in the core NWP tasks. In particular, we reconsider the fundamental constraints of a purely data‐driven approach to forecasting and provide a view on how to best integrate machine learning technologies within current data assimilation and forecasting methods.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T05:57:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d548c094e36647cdbbffb6f198a2f7b3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1942-2466
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T05:57:29Z
publishDate 2020-12-01
publisher American Geophysical Union (AGU)
record_format Article
series Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
spelling doaj.art-d548c094e36647cdbbffb6f198a2f7b32022-12-21T18:36:40ZengAmerican Geophysical Union (AGU)Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems1942-24662020-12-011212n/an/a10.1029/2020MS002232Machine Learning for Model Error Inference and CorrectionMassimo Bonavita0Patrick Laloyaux1European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts Reading UKEuropean Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts Reading UKAbstract Model error is one of the main obstacles to improved accuracy and reliability in numerical weather prediction (NWP) and climate prediction conducted with state‐of‐the‐art, comprehensive high‐resolution general circulation models. In a data assimilation framework, recent advances in the context of weak‐constraint 4D‐Var have shown that it is possible to estimate and correct for a large fraction of systematic model error which develops in the stratosphere over short forecast ranges. The recent explosion of interest in machine learning/deep learning technologies has been driven by their remarkable success in disparate application areas. This raises the question of whether model error estimation and correction in operational NWP and climate prediction can also benefit from these techniques. In this work, we aim to start to give an answer to this question. Specifically, we show that artificial neural networks (ANNs) can reproduce the main results obtained with weak‐constraint 4D‐Var in the operational configuration of the IFS model of the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF). We show that the use of ANN models inside the weak‐constraint 4D‐Var framework has the potential to extend the applicability of the weak‐constraint methodology for model error correction to the whole atmospheric column. Finally, we discuss the potential and limitations of the machine learning/deep learning technologies in the core NWP tasks. In particular, we reconsider the fundamental constraints of a purely data‐driven approach to forecasting and provide a view on how to best integrate machine learning technologies within current data assimilation and forecasting methods.https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002232model errorneural networksweak‐constraint 4D‐Vardata assimilationartificial intelligenceECMWF
spellingShingle Massimo Bonavita
Patrick Laloyaux
Machine Learning for Model Error Inference and Correction
Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
model error
neural networks
weak‐constraint 4D‐Var
data assimilation
artificial intelligence
ECMWF
title Machine Learning for Model Error Inference and Correction
title_full Machine Learning for Model Error Inference and Correction
title_fullStr Machine Learning for Model Error Inference and Correction
title_full_unstemmed Machine Learning for Model Error Inference and Correction
title_short Machine Learning for Model Error Inference and Correction
title_sort machine learning for model error inference and correction
topic model error
neural networks
weak‐constraint 4D‐Var
data assimilation
artificial intelligence
ECMWF
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002232
work_keys_str_mv AT massimobonavita machinelearningformodelerrorinferenceandcorrection
AT patricklaloyaux machinelearningformodelerrorinferenceandcorrection