Snow Depth Fusion Based on Machine Learning Methods for the Northern Hemisphere

In this study, a machine learning algorithm was introduced to fuse gridded snow depth datasets. The input variables of the machine learning method included geolocation (latitude and longitude), topographic data (elevation), gridded snow depth datasets and in situ observations. A total of 29,565 in s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yanxing Hu, Tao Che, Liyun Dai, Lin Xiao
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-03-01
Series:Remote Sensing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/7/1250
_version_ 1797540053834006528
author Yanxing Hu
Tao Che
Liyun Dai
Lin Xiao
author_facet Yanxing Hu
Tao Che
Liyun Dai
Lin Xiao
author_sort Yanxing Hu
collection DOAJ
description In this study, a machine learning algorithm was introduced to fuse gridded snow depth datasets. The input variables of the machine learning method included geolocation (latitude and longitude), topographic data (elevation), gridded snow depth datasets and in situ observations. A total of 29,565 in situ observations were used to train and optimize the machine learning algorithm. A total of five gridded snow depth datasets—Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer for the Earth Observing System (AMSR-E) snow depth, Global Snow Monitoring for Climate Research (GlobSnow) snow depth, Long time series of daily snow depth over the Northern Hemisphere (NHSD) snow depth, ERA-Interim snow depth and Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications, version 2 (MERRA-2) snow depth—were used as input variables. The first three snow depth datasets are retrieved from passive microwave brightness temperature or assimilation with in situ observations, while the last two are snow depth datasets obtained from meteorological reanalysis data with a land surface model and data assimilation system. Then, three machine learning methods, i.e., Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), Support Vector Regression (SVR), and Random Forest Regression (RFR), were used to produce a fused snow depth dataset from 2002 to 2004. The RFR model performed best and was thus used to produce a new snow depth product from the fusion of the five snow depth datasets and auxiliary data over the Northern Hemisphere from 2002 to 2011. The fused snow-depth product was verified at five well-known snow observation sites. The R<sup>2</sup> of Sodankylä, Old Aspen, and Reynolds Mountains East were 0.88, 0.69, and 0.63, respectively. At the Swamp Angel Study Plot and Weissfluhjoch observation sites, which have an average snow depth exceeding 200 cm, the fused snow depth did not perform well. The spatial patterns of the average snow depth were analyzed seasonally, and the average snow depths of autumn, winter, and spring were 5.7, 25.8, and 21.5 cm, respectively. In the future, random forest regression will be used to produce a long time series of a fused snow depth dataset over the Northern Hemisphere or other specific regions.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T12:54:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d55e0abf15f54b58b2789a53845b4837
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2072-4292
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T12:54:37Z
publishDate 2021-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Remote Sensing
spelling doaj.art-d55e0abf15f54b58b2789a53845b48372023-11-21T12:01:31ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922021-03-01137125010.3390/rs13071250Snow Depth Fusion Based on Machine Learning Methods for the Northern HemisphereYanxing Hu0Tao Che1Liyun Dai2Lin Xiao3Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing of Gansu Province, Heihe Remote Sensing Experimental Research Station, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Science, Lanzhou 730000, ChinaKey Laboratory of Remote Sensing of Gansu Province, Heihe Remote Sensing Experimental Research Station, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Science, Lanzhou 730000, ChinaKey Laboratory of Remote Sensing of Gansu Province, Heihe Remote Sensing Experimental Research Station, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Science, Lanzhou 730000, ChinaNational Forestry and Grassland Administration Key Laboratory of Forest Resource Conservation and Ecological Safety on the Upper Reaches of the Yangtze River, Sichuan Province Key Laboratory of Ecological Forestry Engineering on the Upper Reaches of the Yangtze River, College of Forestry, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, ChinaIn this study, a machine learning algorithm was introduced to fuse gridded snow depth datasets. The input variables of the machine learning method included geolocation (latitude and longitude), topographic data (elevation), gridded snow depth datasets and in situ observations. A total of 29,565 in situ observations were used to train and optimize the machine learning algorithm. A total of five gridded snow depth datasets—Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer for the Earth Observing System (AMSR-E) snow depth, Global Snow Monitoring for Climate Research (GlobSnow) snow depth, Long time series of daily snow depth over the Northern Hemisphere (NHSD) snow depth, ERA-Interim snow depth and Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications, version 2 (MERRA-2) snow depth—were used as input variables. The first three snow depth datasets are retrieved from passive microwave brightness temperature or assimilation with in situ observations, while the last two are snow depth datasets obtained from meteorological reanalysis data with a land surface model and data assimilation system. Then, three machine learning methods, i.e., Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), Support Vector Regression (SVR), and Random Forest Regression (RFR), were used to produce a fused snow depth dataset from 2002 to 2004. The RFR model performed best and was thus used to produce a new snow depth product from the fusion of the five snow depth datasets and auxiliary data over the Northern Hemisphere from 2002 to 2011. The fused snow-depth product was verified at five well-known snow observation sites. The R<sup>2</sup> of Sodankylä, Old Aspen, and Reynolds Mountains East were 0.88, 0.69, and 0.63, respectively. At the Swamp Angel Study Plot and Weissfluhjoch observation sites, which have an average snow depth exceeding 200 cm, the fused snow depth did not perform well. The spatial patterns of the average snow depth were analyzed seasonally, and the average snow depths of autumn, winter, and spring were 5.7, 25.8, and 21.5 cm, respectively. In the future, random forest regression will be used to produce a long time series of a fused snow depth dataset over the Northern Hemisphere or other specific regions.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/7/1250snow depth datasetsdata fusionmachine learning algorithmsthe Northern Hemisphere
spellingShingle Yanxing Hu
Tao Che
Liyun Dai
Lin Xiao
Snow Depth Fusion Based on Machine Learning Methods for the Northern Hemisphere
Remote Sensing
snow depth datasets
data fusion
machine learning algorithms
the Northern Hemisphere
title Snow Depth Fusion Based on Machine Learning Methods for the Northern Hemisphere
title_full Snow Depth Fusion Based on Machine Learning Methods for the Northern Hemisphere
title_fullStr Snow Depth Fusion Based on Machine Learning Methods for the Northern Hemisphere
title_full_unstemmed Snow Depth Fusion Based on Machine Learning Methods for the Northern Hemisphere
title_short Snow Depth Fusion Based on Machine Learning Methods for the Northern Hemisphere
title_sort snow depth fusion based on machine learning methods for the northern hemisphere
topic snow depth datasets
data fusion
machine learning algorithms
the Northern Hemisphere
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/7/1250
work_keys_str_mv AT yanxinghu snowdepthfusionbasedonmachinelearningmethodsforthenorthernhemisphere
AT taoche snowdepthfusionbasedonmachinelearningmethodsforthenorthernhemisphere
AT liyundai snowdepthfusionbasedonmachinelearningmethodsforthenorthernhemisphere
AT linxiao snowdepthfusionbasedonmachinelearningmethodsforthenorthernhemisphere