Risk Factors for Symptomatic Pericardial Effusions Posthematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant

Background. Pericardial effusions are a known complication posthematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), causing significant morbidity. We aimed to evaluate the risk factors associated with the development of high-grade effusions requiring interventions. Procedure. A retrospective chart review of a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kelly Lyons, Niti Dham, Bryanna Schwartz, Blachy J. Dávila Saldaña
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2023-01-01
Series:Journal of Transplantation
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/7455756
_version_ 1797903063380393984
author Kelly Lyons
Niti Dham
Bryanna Schwartz
Blachy J. Dávila Saldaña
author_facet Kelly Lyons
Niti Dham
Bryanna Schwartz
Blachy J. Dávila Saldaña
author_sort Kelly Lyons
collection DOAJ
description Background. Pericardial effusions are a known complication posthematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), causing significant morbidity. We aimed to evaluate the risk factors associated with the development of high-grade effusions requiring interventions. Procedure. A retrospective chart review of all HSCT patients over a period of 7 years (2013–2019) in a single institution in the Northeastern United States is conducted. All patients who developed an effusion requiring intervention were included. Patient’s clinical characteristics were compared with all others transplanted during the same time period. Echocardiogram findings of the affected patients were compared to a case-control cohort of unaffected patients with similar age and diagnosis. Chi-square and paired t-tests were utilized to ascertain statistical differences between the groups. Results. A total of 15 patients out of 201 (7.5%) transplanted at our institution developed a moderate or large pericardial effusion requiring pericardiocentesis or a pericardial window. Of this cohort, 13 (87%) underwent a myeloablative preparative regimen, 13 (87%) had cyclophosphamide as part of their regimen, 13 (87%) had recent treatment for viral reactivation, 6 (40%) had an underlying hemoglobinopathy diagnosis, and only 4 (27%) had an active diagnosis of GVHD. A myeloablative preparative regimen had a higher rate of effusion requiring intervention, although it was not statistically significant, and concurrent GVHD was not predictive of effusion development. However, exposure to cyclophosphamide, recent treatment for viral reactivation, and a diagnosis of transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (Ta-TMA) were highly associated with effusions. The latter was associated with increased mortality. The duration of pericardial effusion correlated with the pretransplant echocardiogram left ventricle end diastolic diameter z-score and apical 4-chamber left ventricular peak average strain measurement. Conclusions. Potential risk factors for pericardial effusions post-HSCT include a diagnosis of Ta-TMA, active viral infection, exposure to cyclophosphamide, and a higher left ventricle end diastolic diameter z-score. This information may help guide management for these patients, including identifying high-risk subjects, determining the frequency of echocardiograms, and determining specific echocardiogram measures to follow over time.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T09:27:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d56cfd6fff9946ca8ca8071bdd8aaa7c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2090-0015
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T09:27:04Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Hindawi Limited
record_format Article
series Journal of Transplantation
spelling doaj.art-d56cfd6fff9946ca8ca8071bdd8aaa7c2023-02-20T01:57:27ZengHindawi LimitedJournal of Transplantation2090-00152023-01-01202310.1155/2023/7455756Risk Factors for Symptomatic Pericardial Effusions Posthematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantKelly Lyons0Niti Dham1Bryanna Schwartz2Blachy J. Dávila Saldaña3Children’s National HospitalChildren’s National HospitalChildren’s National HospitalChildren’s National HospitalBackground. Pericardial effusions are a known complication posthematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), causing significant morbidity. We aimed to evaluate the risk factors associated with the development of high-grade effusions requiring interventions. Procedure. A retrospective chart review of all HSCT patients over a period of 7 years (2013–2019) in a single institution in the Northeastern United States is conducted. All patients who developed an effusion requiring intervention were included. Patient’s clinical characteristics were compared with all others transplanted during the same time period. Echocardiogram findings of the affected patients were compared to a case-control cohort of unaffected patients with similar age and diagnosis. Chi-square and paired t-tests were utilized to ascertain statistical differences between the groups. Results. A total of 15 patients out of 201 (7.5%) transplanted at our institution developed a moderate or large pericardial effusion requiring pericardiocentesis or a pericardial window. Of this cohort, 13 (87%) underwent a myeloablative preparative regimen, 13 (87%) had cyclophosphamide as part of their regimen, 13 (87%) had recent treatment for viral reactivation, 6 (40%) had an underlying hemoglobinopathy diagnosis, and only 4 (27%) had an active diagnosis of GVHD. A myeloablative preparative regimen had a higher rate of effusion requiring intervention, although it was not statistically significant, and concurrent GVHD was not predictive of effusion development. However, exposure to cyclophosphamide, recent treatment for viral reactivation, and a diagnosis of transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (Ta-TMA) were highly associated with effusions. The latter was associated with increased mortality. The duration of pericardial effusion correlated with the pretransplant echocardiogram left ventricle end diastolic diameter z-score and apical 4-chamber left ventricular peak average strain measurement. Conclusions. Potential risk factors for pericardial effusions post-HSCT include a diagnosis of Ta-TMA, active viral infection, exposure to cyclophosphamide, and a higher left ventricle end diastolic diameter z-score. This information may help guide management for these patients, including identifying high-risk subjects, determining the frequency of echocardiograms, and determining specific echocardiogram measures to follow over time.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/7455756
spellingShingle Kelly Lyons
Niti Dham
Bryanna Schwartz
Blachy J. Dávila Saldaña
Risk Factors for Symptomatic Pericardial Effusions Posthematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant
Journal of Transplantation
title Risk Factors for Symptomatic Pericardial Effusions Posthematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant
title_full Risk Factors for Symptomatic Pericardial Effusions Posthematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant
title_fullStr Risk Factors for Symptomatic Pericardial Effusions Posthematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant
title_full_unstemmed Risk Factors for Symptomatic Pericardial Effusions Posthematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant
title_short Risk Factors for Symptomatic Pericardial Effusions Posthematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant
title_sort risk factors for symptomatic pericardial effusions posthematopoietic stem cell transplant
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/7455756
work_keys_str_mv AT kellylyons riskfactorsforsymptomaticpericardialeffusionsposthematopoieticstemcelltransplant
AT nitidham riskfactorsforsymptomaticpericardialeffusionsposthematopoieticstemcelltransplant
AT bryannaschwartz riskfactorsforsymptomaticpericardialeffusionsposthematopoieticstemcelltransplant
AT blachyjdavilasaldana riskfactorsforsymptomaticpericardialeffusionsposthematopoieticstemcelltransplant