Absence of July Phenomenon in Acute Ischemic Stroke Care Quality and Outcomes

BackgroundLower care quality and an increase in adverse outcomes as a result of new medical trainees is a concept well rooted in popular belief, termed the “July phenomenon.” Whether this phenomenon occurs in acute ischemic stroke has not been well studied. Methods and ResultsWe analyzed data from p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marco Gonzalez‐Castellon, Christine Ju, Ying Xian, Adrian Hernandez, Gregg C. Fonarow, Lee Schwamm, Eric E. Smith, Deepak L. Bhatt, Matthew Reeves, Joshua Z. Willey
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2018-02-01
Series:Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.117.007685
_version_ 1828309943542874112
author Marco Gonzalez‐Castellon
Christine Ju
Ying Xian
Adrian Hernandez
Gregg C. Fonarow
Lee Schwamm
Eric E. Smith
Deepak L. Bhatt
Matthew Reeves
Joshua Z. Willey
author_facet Marco Gonzalez‐Castellon
Christine Ju
Ying Xian
Adrian Hernandez
Gregg C. Fonarow
Lee Schwamm
Eric E. Smith
Deepak L. Bhatt
Matthew Reeves
Joshua Z. Willey
author_sort Marco Gonzalez‐Castellon
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundLower care quality and an increase in adverse outcomes as a result of new medical trainees is a concept well rooted in popular belief, termed the “July phenomenon.” Whether this phenomenon occurs in acute ischemic stroke has not been well studied. Methods and ResultsWe analyzed data from patients admitted with ischemic stroke in 1625 hospitals participating in the Get With The Guidelines–Stroke program for the 5‐year period between January 2009 and December 2013. We compared acute stroke treatment processes and in‐hospitals outcomes among the 4 quarters (first quarter: July–September, last quarter: April–June) of the academic year. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate the relationship between academic year transition and processes measures. A total of 967 891 patients were included in the study. There was a statistically significant, but modest (<4 minutes or 5 percentage points) difference in distribution of or quality and clinical metrics including door‐to‐computerized tomography time, door‐to‐needle time, the proportion of patients with symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 36 hours of admission, and the proportion of patients who received defect‐free care in stroke performance measures among academic year quarters (P<0.0001). In multivariable analyses, there was no evidence that quarter 1 of the academic year was associated with lower quality of care or worse in‐hospital outcomes in teaching and nonteaching hospitals. ConclusionsWe found no evidence of the “July phenomenon” in patients with acute ischemic stroke among hospitals participating in the Get With The Guidelines–Stroke program.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T15:35:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d580218a3e9d4b83ba380e4e4886eaaa
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2047-9980
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T15:35:54Z
publishDate 2018-02-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
spelling doaj.art-d580218a3e9d4b83ba380e4e4886eaaa2022-12-22T02:41:16ZengWileyJournal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease2047-99802018-02-017310.1161/JAHA.117.007685Absence of July Phenomenon in Acute Ischemic Stroke Care Quality and OutcomesMarco Gonzalez‐Castellon0Christine Ju1Ying Xian2Adrian Hernandez3Gregg C. Fonarow4Lee Schwamm5Eric E. Smith6Deepak L. Bhatt7Matthew Reeves8Joshua Z. Willey9Department of Neurological Sciences, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NEDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NCDepartment of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NCDepartment of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NCRonald Reagan–UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CADepartment of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MAHotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Alberta, CanadaBrigham and Women's Heart &amp; Vascular Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MADepartment of Epidemiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MIDivision of Stroke, Department of Neurology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NYBackgroundLower care quality and an increase in adverse outcomes as a result of new medical trainees is a concept well rooted in popular belief, termed the “July phenomenon.” Whether this phenomenon occurs in acute ischemic stroke has not been well studied. Methods and ResultsWe analyzed data from patients admitted with ischemic stroke in 1625 hospitals participating in the Get With The Guidelines–Stroke program for the 5‐year period between January 2009 and December 2013. We compared acute stroke treatment processes and in‐hospitals outcomes among the 4 quarters (first quarter: July–September, last quarter: April–June) of the academic year. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate the relationship between academic year transition and processes measures. A total of 967 891 patients were included in the study. There was a statistically significant, but modest (<4 minutes or 5 percentage points) difference in distribution of or quality and clinical metrics including door‐to‐computerized tomography time, door‐to‐needle time, the proportion of patients with symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 36 hours of admission, and the proportion of patients who received defect‐free care in stroke performance measures among academic year quarters (P<0.0001). In multivariable analyses, there was no evidence that quarter 1 of the academic year was associated with lower quality of care or worse in‐hospital outcomes in teaching and nonteaching hospitals. ConclusionsWe found no evidence of the “July phenomenon” in patients with acute ischemic stroke among hospitals participating in the Get With The Guidelines–Stroke program.https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.117.007685ischemic strokethrombolysis
spellingShingle Marco Gonzalez‐Castellon
Christine Ju
Ying Xian
Adrian Hernandez
Gregg C. Fonarow
Lee Schwamm
Eric E. Smith
Deepak L. Bhatt
Matthew Reeves
Joshua Z. Willey
Absence of July Phenomenon in Acute Ischemic Stroke Care Quality and Outcomes
Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
ischemic stroke
thrombolysis
title Absence of July Phenomenon in Acute Ischemic Stroke Care Quality and Outcomes
title_full Absence of July Phenomenon in Acute Ischemic Stroke Care Quality and Outcomes
title_fullStr Absence of July Phenomenon in Acute Ischemic Stroke Care Quality and Outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Absence of July Phenomenon in Acute Ischemic Stroke Care Quality and Outcomes
title_short Absence of July Phenomenon in Acute Ischemic Stroke Care Quality and Outcomes
title_sort absence of july phenomenon in acute ischemic stroke care quality and outcomes
topic ischemic stroke
thrombolysis
url https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.117.007685
work_keys_str_mv AT marcogonzalezcastellon absenceofjulyphenomenoninacuteischemicstrokecarequalityandoutcomes
AT christineju absenceofjulyphenomenoninacuteischemicstrokecarequalityandoutcomes
AT yingxian absenceofjulyphenomenoninacuteischemicstrokecarequalityandoutcomes
AT adrianhernandez absenceofjulyphenomenoninacuteischemicstrokecarequalityandoutcomes
AT greggcfonarow absenceofjulyphenomenoninacuteischemicstrokecarequalityandoutcomes
AT leeschwamm absenceofjulyphenomenoninacuteischemicstrokecarequalityandoutcomes
AT ericesmith absenceofjulyphenomenoninacuteischemicstrokecarequalityandoutcomes
AT deepaklbhatt absenceofjulyphenomenoninacuteischemicstrokecarequalityandoutcomes
AT matthewreeves absenceofjulyphenomenoninacuteischemicstrokecarequalityandoutcomes
AT joshuazwilley absenceofjulyphenomenoninacuteischemicstrokecarequalityandoutcomes