Qualimetric approaches to assessing sustainable development indicators

The study discusses approaches to assessing the quality of sustainable development indicators and analyses sustainable development indicators in general, for which the desirability function and the approach of translating sustainable development indicators into a dimensionless scale are used. This a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hrinchenko Hanna, Trishch Roman, Mykolaiko Volodymyr, Kovtun Oksana
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2023-01-01
Series:E3S Web of Conferences
Online Access:https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2023/45/e3sconf_iscmee2023_01013.pdf
_version_ 1797745708516769792
author Hrinchenko Hanna
Trishch Roman
Mykolaiko Volodymyr
Kovtun Oksana
author_facet Hrinchenko Hanna
Trishch Roman
Mykolaiko Volodymyr
Kovtun Oksana
author_sort Hrinchenko Hanna
collection DOAJ
description The study discusses approaches to assessing the quality of sustainable development indicators and analyses sustainable development indicators in general, for which the desirability function and the approach of translating sustainable development indicators into a dimensionless scale are used. This approach makes it possible to analyse the processes of achieving the sustainable development goals and relevant tasks on the basis of statistical data, as well as to compare indicators with different characteristics. For the purpose of qualimetric assessment, the article proposes to divide the indicators of sustainable development into four groups characterized by the following parameters: the lowest value is the best, the highest value is the best, the average value is the best, and the values that simultaneously tend to the lowest and the highest. It is proposed to evaluate sustainable development indicators in accordance with the group, taking into account the significance of the indicator, for which the form parameter and the evaluation step are selected by the expert evaluation method. For example, several sustainable development indicators for different groups are presented, and calculations are made to determine the dimensionless indicator, taking into account its significance according to the opinion of experts. As a result, we obtained dimensionless values for each of the sustainable development indicators (FQ = 0.92, 0.98, 0.86, 0.28, and 0.54), which characterize the achievement of sustainable development goals and allow us to assess progress in both a prospective and retrospective context.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T15:27:05Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d5836e19d71841118660ed4904ace6a9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2267-1242
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T15:27:05Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher EDP Sciences
record_format Article
series E3S Web of Conferences
spelling doaj.art-d5836e19d71841118660ed4904ace6a92023-08-10T13:16:09ZengEDP SciencesE3S Web of Conferences2267-12422023-01-014080101310.1051/e3sconf/202340801013e3sconf_iscmee2023_01013Qualimetric approaches to assessing sustainable development indicatorsHrinchenko Hanna0Trishch Roman1Mykolaiko Volodymyr2Kovtun Oksana3Ukrainian Engineering Pedagogics AcademyNational Aerospace University “Kharkiv Aviation Institute”Pavlo Tychyna Uman State Pedagogical UniversityHryhorii Skovoroda University in PereiaslavThe study discusses approaches to assessing the quality of sustainable development indicators and analyses sustainable development indicators in general, for which the desirability function and the approach of translating sustainable development indicators into a dimensionless scale are used. This approach makes it possible to analyse the processes of achieving the sustainable development goals and relevant tasks on the basis of statistical data, as well as to compare indicators with different characteristics. For the purpose of qualimetric assessment, the article proposes to divide the indicators of sustainable development into four groups characterized by the following parameters: the lowest value is the best, the highest value is the best, the average value is the best, and the values that simultaneously tend to the lowest and the highest. It is proposed to evaluate sustainable development indicators in accordance with the group, taking into account the significance of the indicator, for which the form parameter and the evaluation step are selected by the expert evaluation method. For example, several sustainable development indicators for different groups are presented, and calculations are made to determine the dimensionless indicator, taking into account its significance according to the opinion of experts. As a result, we obtained dimensionless values for each of the sustainable development indicators (FQ = 0.92, 0.98, 0.86, 0.28, and 0.54), which characterize the achievement of sustainable development goals and allow us to assess progress in both a prospective and retrospective context.https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2023/45/e3sconf_iscmee2023_01013.pdf
spellingShingle Hrinchenko Hanna
Trishch Roman
Mykolaiko Volodymyr
Kovtun Oksana
Qualimetric approaches to assessing sustainable development indicators
E3S Web of Conferences
title Qualimetric approaches to assessing sustainable development indicators
title_full Qualimetric approaches to assessing sustainable development indicators
title_fullStr Qualimetric approaches to assessing sustainable development indicators
title_full_unstemmed Qualimetric approaches to assessing sustainable development indicators
title_short Qualimetric approaches to assessing sustainable development indicators
title_sort qualimetric approaches to assessing sustainable development indicators
url https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2023/45/e3sconf_iscmee2023_01013.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT hrinchenkohanna qualimetricapproachestoassessingsustainabledevelopmentindicators
AT trishchroman qualimetricapproachestoassessingsustainabledevelopmentindicators
AT mykolaikovolodymyr qualimetricapproachestoassessingsustainabledevelopmentindicators
AT kovtunoksana qualimetricapproachestoassessingsustainabledevelopmentindicators