Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis: Updated Perspectives

Manachai Nonpassopon,1,2 Muanploy Niparugs,2,3 Maria Soledad Cortina2 1Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand; 2Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA; 3Department of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nonpassopon M, Niparugs M, Cortina MS
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2020-04-01
Series:Clinical Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.dovepress.com/boston-type-1-keratoprosthesis-updated-perspectives-peer-reviewed-article-OPTH
_version_ 1818853629060186112
author Nonpassopon M
Niparugs M
Cortina MS
author_facet Nonpassopon M
Niparugs M
Cortina MS
author_sort Nonpassopon M
collection DOAJ
description Manachai Nonpassopon,1,2 Muanploy Niparugs,2,3 Maria Soledad Cortina2 1Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand; 2Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA; 3Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Chaing Mai University, Chaing Mai, ThailandCorrespondence: Maria Soledad CortinaDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1855 W. Taylor Street, M/C 648, Chicago, IL 60612, USATel +1 312 996-6590Email mcortina@uic.eduAbstract: The use of Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis (BKPro) has significantly increased worldwide. It is no longer considered a procedure of last resort but a reasonable option for patients with otherwise poor prognosis for a traditional penetrating keratoplasty. BKPro was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 1992 for bilateral severe corneal blindness due to multiple corneal transplant failure. Over the years, indications have extended beyond recurrent immunologic rejection to include other conditions such as chemical injury and other causes of bilateral limbal stem cell deficiency, extensive corneal neovascularization, neurotrophic corneas and hypotony, among others. Numerous advances in the design of the BKPro, improvement of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative management have resulted in favorable outcomes and a reduction in postoperative complications. Accordingly, many studies have shown that implantation of this device is highly effective in restoring vision with very good short-term outcomes. However, due to the lifetime risk of sight-threatening complications after BKPro implantation, a longer follow-up period should provide outcomes that are more realistic. In this review, the authors examined only the results of publications with an average of at least 2 years of follow-up. The overall intermediate to long-term visual outcomes and retention rate in BKPro seem to be favorable. However, autoimmune diseases and cicatrizing conditions continue to show a higher incidence of postoperative complications that require further management.Keywords: Boston keratoprosthesis, corneal transplantation, limbal stem cell deficiency
first_indexed 2024-12-19T07:39:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d5857e8813e6450bbcef3a045b39cf13
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1177-5483
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T07:39:51Z
publishDate 2020-04-01
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format Article
series Clinical Ophthalmology
spelling doaj.art-d5857e8813e6450bbcef3a045b39cf132022-12-21T20:30:29ZengDove Medical PressClinical Ophthalmology1177-54832020-04-01Volume 141189120053400Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis: Updated PerspectivesNonpassopon MNiparugs MCortina MSManachai Nonpassopon,1,2 Muanploy Niparugs,2,3 Maria Soledad Cortina2 1Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand; 2Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA; 3Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Chaing Mai University, Chaing Mai, ThailandCorrespondence: Maria Soledad CortinaDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1855 W. Taylor Street, M/C 648, Chicago, IL 60612, USATel +1 312 996-6590Email mcortina@uic.eduAbstract: The use of Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis (BKPro) has significantly increased worldwide. It is no longer considered a procedure of last resort but a reasonable option for patients with otherwise poor prognosis for a traditional penetrating keratoplasty. BKPro was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 1992 for bilateral severe corneal blindness due to multiple corneal transplant failure. Over the years, indications have extended beyond recurrent immunologic rejection to include other conditions such as chemical injury and other causes of bilateral limbal stem cell deficiency, extensive corneal neovascularization, neurotrophic corneas and hypotony, among others. Numerous advances in the design of the BKPro, improvement of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative management have resulted in favorable outcomes and a reduction in postoperative complications. Accordingly, many studies have shown that implantation of this device is highly effective in restoring vision with very good short-term outcomes. However, due to the lifetime risk of sight-threatening complications after BKPro implantation, a longer follow-up period should provide outcomes that are more realistic. In this review, the authors examined only the results of publications with an average of at least 2 years of follow-up. The overall intermediate to long-term visual outcomes and retention rate in BKPro seem to be favorable. However, autoimmune diseases and cicatrizing conditions continue to show a higher incidence of postoperative complications that require further management.Keywords: Boston keratoprosthesis, corneal transplantation, limbal stem cell deficiencyhttps://www.dovepress.com/boston-type-1-keratoprosthesis-updated-perspectives-peer-reviewed-article-OPTHboston keratoprosthesiscorneal transplantationlimbal stem cell deficiency
spellingShingle Nonpassopon M
Niparugs M
Cortina MS
Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis: Updated Perspectives
Clinical Ophthalmology
boston keratoprosthesis
corneal transplantation
limbal stem cell deficiency
title Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis: Updated Perspectives
title_full Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis: Updated Perspectives
title_fullStr Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis: Updated Perspectives
title_full_unstemmed Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis: Updated Perspectives
title_short Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis: Updated Perspectives
title_sort boston type 1 keratoprosthesis updated perspectives
topic boston keratoprosthesis
corneal transplantation
limbal stem cell deficiency
url https://www.dovepress.com/boston-type-1-keratoprosthesis-updated-perspectives-peer-reviewed-article-OPTH
work_keys_str_mv AT nonpassoponm bostontype1keratoprosthesisupdatedperspectives
AT niparugsm bostontype1keratoprosthesisupdatedperspectives
AT cortinams bostontype1keratoprosthesisupdatedperspectives