Comparison of Diathermy versus Surgical Scalpel for Skin Incisions in Elective General Surgical Procedures

Objective: To compare diathermy versus surgical scalpel in skin incisions in elective general surgical procedures regarding incision time, post-operative pain and surgical site infection. Study Design: Quasi-experimental study. Place and Study Duration: Department of Surgery, Combined Militar...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Adnan Younis Panni, Muhammad Sajid Jarral, Rasikh Maqsood, Mujahid Zulfiqar Ali, Naqeebullah Shah, Waqas Ahmed
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Army Medical College Rawalpindi 2023-06-01
Series:Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.pafmj.org/index.php/PAFMJ/article/view/6792
_version_ 1827822266520436736
author Adnan Younis Panni
Muhammad Sajid Jarral
Rasikh Maqsood
Mujahid Zulfiqar Ali
Naqeebullah Shah
Waqas Ahmed
author_facet Adnan Younis Panni
Muhammad Sajid Jarral
Rasikh Maqsood
Mujahid Zulfiqar Ali
Naqeebullah Shah
Waqas Ahmed
author_sort Adnan Younis Panni
collection DOAJ
description Objective: To compare diathermy versus surgical scalpel in skin incisions in elective general surgical procedures regarding incision time, post-operative pain and surgical site infection. Study Design: Quasi-experimental study. Place and Study Duration: Department of Surgery, Combined Military Hospital, Peshawar Pakistan, from Feb to Jul 2020. Methodology: A total of 106 patients undergoing general elective procedures aged 20-60 years belonging to either gender were included in the study. They were divided into two equal groups of 53 patients each. Patients with ischemic heart disease, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and dirty and contaminated procedures were excluded. Group-A patients underwent skin incisions with diathermy, while Group-B patients underwent skin incisions with a surgical blade on a scalpel. The incision time was noted for both groups. All patients were followed for post-operative pain per visual analogue score and development of surgical site infection. Results: Mean incision time in Group-A (Diathermy-Group) was 46.58±8.03 seconds, while in Group-B (Scalpel-Group), it was 54.75±7.91 seconds (p<0.001). The mean post-operative pain score in Group-A (Diathermy Group) was 2.25±0.76, while in Group-B (Scalpel Group), it was 3.58±0.91 (p<0.001). Wound infection was found in 3.77% of patients in Group-A, while in Group- B, it was found in 15.09% (p=0.046). Conclusion: Incision with Diathermy is better than scalpel skin incisions regarding incision time, post-operative pain and postoperative surgical site infection.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T01:55:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d598c63ea48744f0b2c6f2cea730af8c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0030-9648
2411-8842
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T01:55:39Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher Army Medical College Rawalpindi
record_format Article
series Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal
spelling doaj.art-d598c63ea48744f0b2c6f2cea730af8c2023-09-08T06:02:55ZengArmy Medical College RawalpindiPakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal0030-96482411-88422023-06-0173310.51253/pafmj.v73i3.6792Comparison of Diathermy versus Surgical Scalpel for Skin Incisions in Elective General Surgical ProceduresAdnan Younis Panni0Muhammad Sajid Jarral1Rasikh Maqsood2Mujahid Zulfiqar Ali3Naqeebullah Shah4Waqas Ahmed5Department of Surgery, 130 Medical Battalion, Gilgit Baltistan, PakistanDepartment of Surgery, 130 Medical Battalion, Gilgit Baltistan, PakistanDepartment of Surgery, Combined Military Hospital/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Rawalpindi PakistanDepartment of Surgery, Combined Military Hospital, Quetta/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) PakistanDepartment of Surgery, Combined Military Hospital/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Rawalpindi PakistanDepartment of Surgery, 144 Medical Battalion, Siachen Pakistan Objective: To compare diathermy versus surgical scalpel in skin incisions in elective general surgical procedures regarding incision time, post-operative pain and surgical site infection. Study Design: Quasi-experimental study. Place and Study Duration: Department of Surgery, Combined Military Hospital, Peshawar Pakistan, from Feb to Jul 2020. Methodology: A total of 106 patients undergoing general elective procedures aged 20-60 years belonging to either gender were included in the study. They were divided into two equal groups of 53 patients each. Patients with ischemic heart disease, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and dirty and contaminated procedures were excluded. Group-A patients underwent skin incisions with diathermy, while Group-B patients underwent skin incisions with a surgical blade on a scalpel. The incision time was noted for both groups. All patients were followed for post-operative pain per visual analogue score and development of surgical site infection. Results: Mean incision time in Group-A (Diathermy-Group) was 46.58±8.03 seconds, while in Group-B (Scalpel-Group), it was 54.75±7.91 seconds (p<0.001). The mean post-operative pain score in Group-A (Diathermy Group) was 2.25±0.76, while in Group-B (Scalpel Group), it was 3.58±0.91 (p<0.001). Wound infection was found in 3.77% of patients in Group-A, while in Group- B, it was found in 15.09% (p=0.046). Conclusion: Incision with Diathermy is better than scalpel skin incisions regarding incision time, post-operative pain and postoperative surgical site infection. https://www.pafmj.org/index.php/PAFMJ/article/view/6792Diathermyincision timePost-operative painSurgical site infection
spellingShingle Adnan Younis Panni
Muhammad Sajid Jarral
Rasikh Maqsood
Mujahid Zulfiqar Ali
Naqeebullah Shah
Waqas Ahmed
Comparison of Diathermy versus Surgical Scalpel for Skin Incisions in Elective General Surgical Procedures
Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal
Diathermy
incision time
Post-operative pain
Surgical site infection
title Comparison of Diathermy versus Surgical Scalpel for Skin Incisions in Elective General Surgical Procedures
title_full Comparison of Diathermy versus Surgical Scalpel for Skin Incisions in Elective General Surgical Procedures
title_fullStr Comparison of Diathermy versus Surgical Scalpel for Skin Incisions in Elective General Surgical Procedures
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Diathermy versus Surgical Scalpel for Skin Incisions in Elective General Surgical Procedures
title_short Comparison of Diathermy versus Surgical Scalpel for Skin Incisions in Elective General Surgical Procedures
title_sort comparison of diathermy versus surgical scalpel for skin incisions in elective general surgical procedures
topic Diathermy
incision time
Post-operative pain
Surgical site infection
url https://www.pafmj.org/index.php/PAFMJ/article/view/6792
work_keys_str_mv AT adnanyounispanni comparisonofdiathermyversussurgicalscalpelforskinincisionsinelectivegeneralsurgicalprocedures
AT muhammadsajidjarral comparisonofdiathermyversussurgicalscalpelforskinincisionsinelectivegeneralsurgicalprocedures
AT rasikhmaqsood comparisonofdiathermyversussurgicalscalpelforskinincisionsinelectivegeneralsurgicalprocedures
AT mujahidzulfiqarali comparisonofdiathermyversussurgicalscalpelforskinincisionsinelectivegeneralsurgicalprocedures
AT naqeebullahshah comparisonofdiathermyversussurgicalscalpelforskinincisionsinelectivegeneralsurgicalprocedures
AT waqasahmed comparisonofdiathermyversussurgicalscalpelforskinincisionsinelectivegeneralsurgicalprocedures