Issues of «Pochvennichestvo»: Land and Nation in Publicism by F. M. Dostoevsky and A. I. Solzhenitsyn
The triad: Orthodoxy, autocracy, people form the basis of the conservative views of F.M.Dostoevsky and A.I. Solzhenitsyn. Based on common worldview constants, thinkers build concepts of a national-conservative persuasion. Their creative heritage is broader than “soil culture”, nevertheless, the idea...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Sourthern Federal University
2021-06-01
|
| Series: | Izvestiâ Ûžnogo Federalʹnogo Universiteta: Filologičeskie Nauki |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://philol-journal.sfedu.ru/index.php/sfuphilol/article/view/1624 |
| _version_ | 1830201841859690496 |
|---|---|
| author | Kseniya A. Kulko |
| author_facet | Kseniya A. Kulko |
| author_sort | Kseniya A. Kulko |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The triad: Orthodoxy, autocracy, people form the basis of the conservative views of F.M.Dostoevsky and A.I. Solzhenitsyn. Based on common worldview constants, thinkers build concepts of a national-conservative persuasion. Their creative heritage is broader than “soil culture”, nevertheless, the ideas of this direction are developing in their journalism. The article presents a comparative analysis of the views of the authors concerning their views on the land, the Russian people and the intelligentsia. An analysis of the texts of Dostoevsky’s “Diary of a Writer”, Solzhenitsyn’s artistic and publicistic miniatures “Krohotki” and his other publicistic works allows us to understand why many of the “soil” issues raised in the 19th century were actualized a century later. The continuity of ideas of authors of different centuries in the context of social and political transformations in society is considered. A significant time period separating Dostoevsky and Solzhenitsyn makes it possible to see not only coincidences and consonances in their work, but also divergences. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-18T02:59:42Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-d59cc2adb29f4f0c85c29f7569a03066 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1995-0640 2312-1343 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-18T02:59:42Z |
| publishDate | 2021-06-01 |
| publisher | Sourthern Federal University |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Izvestiâ Ûžnogo Federalʹnogo Universiteta: Filologičeskie Nauki |
| spelling | doaj.art-d59cc2adb29f4f0c85c29f7569a030662022-12-21T21:23:18ZengSourthern Federal UniversityIzvestiâ Ûžnogo Federalʹnogo Universiteta: Filologičeskie Nauki1995-06402312-13432021-06-012021224125310.18522/1995-0640-2021-2-241-253Issues of «Pochvennichestvo»: Land and Nation in Publicism by F. M. Dostoevsky and A. I. SolzhenitsynKseniya A. Kulko0St. Petersburg State UniversityThe triad: Orthodoxy, autocracy, people form the basis of the conservative views of F.M.Dostoevsky and A.I. Solzhenitsyn. Based on common worldview constants, thinkers build concepts of a national-conservative persuasion. Their creative heritage is broader than “soil culture”, nevertheless, the ideas of this direction are developing in their journalism. The article presents a comparative analysis of the views of the authors concerning their views on the land, the Russian people and the intelligentsia. An analysis of the texts of Dostoevsky’s “Diary of a Writer”, Solzhenitsyn’s artistic and publicistic miniatures “Krohotki” and his other publicistic works allows us to understand why many of the “soil” issues raised in the 19th century were actualized a century later. The continuity of ideas of authors of different centuries in the context of social and political transformations in society is considered. A significant time period separating Dostoevsky and Solzhenitsyn makes it possible to see not only coincidences and consonances in their work, but also divergences.https://philol-journal.sfedu.ru/index.php/sfuphilol/article/view/1624f. m. dostoevskya. i. solzhenitsynnativismlandpeopleintelligentsia |
| spellingShingle | Kseniya A. Kulko Issues of «Pochvennichestvo»: Land and Nation in Publicism by F. M. Dostoevsky and A. I. Solzhenitsyn Izvestiâ Ûžnogo Federalʹnogo Universiteta: Filologičeskie Nauki f. m. dostoevsky a. i. solzhenitsyn nativism land people intelligentsia |
| title | Issues of «Pochvennichestvo»: Land and Nation in Publicism by F. M. Dostoevsky and A. I. Solzhenitsyn |
| title_full | Issues of «Pochvennichestvo»: Land and Nation in Publicism by F. M. Dostoevsky and A. I. Solzhenitsyn |
| title_fullStr | Issues of «Pochvennichestvo»: Land and Nation in Publicism by F. M. Dostoevsky and A. I. Solzhenitsyn |
| title_full_unstemmed | Issues of «Pochvennichestvo»: Land and Nation in Publicism by F. M. Dostoevsky and A. I. Solzhenitsyn |
| title_short | Issues of «Pochvennichestvo»: Land and Nation in Publicism by F. M. Dostoevsky and A. I. Solzhenitsyn |
| title_sort | issues of pochvennichestvo land and nation in publicism by f m dostoevsky and a i solzhenitsyn |
| topic | f. m. dostoevsky a. i. solzhenitsyn nativism land people intelligentsia |
| url | https://philol-journal.sfedu.ru/index.php/sfuphilol/article/view/1624 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT kseniyaakulko issuesofpochvennichestvolandandnationinpublicismbyfmdostoevskyandaisolzhenitsyn |