3 Tesla is the preferred field strength for perfusion imaging in coronary artery disease – a comparison to 1.5 Tesla and fractional flow reserve
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2013-01-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance |
| _version_ | 1827279621365694464 |
|---|---|
| author | Bernhardt P Walcher T Buckert D Rottbauer W Rasche V |
| author_facet | Bernhardt P Walcher T Buckert D Rottbauer W Rasche V |
| author_sort | Bernhardt P |
| collection | DOAJ |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-24T08:21:56Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-d5b2f0deab34430e9103630c52f890f9 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1097-6647 1532-429X |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-24T08:21:56Z |
| publishDate | 2013-01-01 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance |
| spelling | doaj.art-d5b2f0deab34430e9103630c52f890f92024-04-17T00:49:48ZengElsevierJournal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance1097-66471532-429X2013-01-0115Suppl 1W410.1186/1532-429X-15-S1-W43 Tesla is the preferred field strength for perfusion imaging in coronary artery disease – a comparison to 1.5 Tesla and fractional flow reserveBernhardt PWalcher TBuckert DRottbauer WRasche V |
| spellingShingle | Bernhardt P Walcher T Buckert D Rottbauer W Rasche V 3 Tesla is the preferred field strength for perfusion imaging in coronary artery disease – a comparison to 1.5 Tesla and fractional flow reserve Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance |
| title | 3 Tesla is the preferred field strength for perfusion imaging in coronary artery disease – a comparison to 1.5 Tesla and fractional flow reserve |
| title_full | 3 Tesla is the preferred field strength for perfusion imaging in coronary artery disease – a comparison to 1.5 Tesla and fractional flow reserve |
| title_fullStr | 3 Tesla is the preferred field strength for perfusion imaging in coronary artery disease – a comparison to 1.5 Tesla and fractional flow reserve |
| title_full_unstemmed | 3 Tesla is the preferred field strength for perfusion imaging in coronary artery disease – a comparison to 1.5 Tesla and fractional flow reserve |
| title_short | 3 Tesla is the preferred field strength for perfusion imaging in coronary artery disease – a comparison to 1.5 Tesla and fractional flow reserve |
| title_sort | 3 tesla is the preferred field strength for perfusion imaging in coronary artery disease a comparison to 1 5 tesla and fractional flow reserve |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT bernhardtp 3teslaisthepreferredfieldstrengthforperfusionimagingincoronaryarterydiseaseacomparisonto15teslaandfractionalflowreserve AT walchert 3teslaisthepreferredfieldstrengthforperfusionimagingincoronaryarterydiseaseacomparisonto15teslaandfractionalflowreserve AT buckertd 3teslaisthepreferredfieldstrengthforperfusionimagingincoronaryarterydiseaseacomparisonto15teslaandfractionalflowreserve AT rottbauerw 3teslaisthepreferredfieldstrengthforperfusionimagingincoronaryarterydiseaseacomparisonto15teslaandfractionalflowreserve AT raschev 3teslaisthepreferredfieldstrengthforperfusionimagingincoronaryarterydiseaseacomparisonto15teslaandfractionalflowreserve |