Why Kumm is Wrong and there is not in LAW a duty to appoint Juncker
<p>I would go so far to say that were the European Council to make a nomination based on the sort of legal duty Kumm asserts, and were that nomination to be taken by the qualified majority vote which the treaty permits, an outvoted state would have good legal grounds for challenging the decisi...
Main Author: | Kenneth Armstrong |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbH
|
Series: | Verfassungsblog |
Online Access: | https://verfassungsblog.de/kumm-wrong-law-duty-appoint-juncker/ |
Similar Items
-
Why Armstrong is wrong and there IS in fact a legal duty to appoint Juncker
by: Mattias Kumm -
Why the European Council is NOT under a legal duty to appoint Jean-Claude Juncker
by: Kenneth Armstrong - Why the Debate between Kumm and Armstrong is about the Wrong Question
-
Why the Council is under a legal duty to propose Juncker as a Commission President
by: Mattias Kumm -
Evaluating Juncker’s Political Commission: The Right Idea in the Wrong Hands?
by: Mark Dawson